2008 CL600 Carlsson New 21" wheels
Last edited by SilverArrow07; May 16, 2008 at 05:46 PM.
Apologies to the OP, I'm just one of those old school guys that think AMG cars look like Hot Wheels. If you like it, by all means enjoy and be proud of it. We can agree that there's a terrific car underneath, 600 is the one.
Trending Topics
Apologies to the OP, I'm just one of those old school guys that think AMG cars look like Hot Wheels. If you like it, by all means enjoy and be proud of it. We can agree that there's a terrific car underneath, 600 is the one.

Well said.....all of these aftermkt things...or even much of mfr-spec'd stuff... end up looking/sounding like "trying too hard"....the delicate (or not-so-delicate
) balance btwn interesting perf stuff and stuff that's trailer pk (or whatever mockable ghetto) deluxe....reality is most buyers are trying to buy an "image", though many don't realize which image they've bought....
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Performance will always be topped in a year or two, and it can often be improved (perhaps none so easily as an ECU upgrade for the 600). But lasting beauty is is for me the only valid counterbalance to the considerable sums we lose in depreciation.
Performance will always be topped in a year or two, and it can often be improved (perhaps none so easily as an ECU upgrade for the 600). But lasting beauty is is for me the only valid counterbalance to the considerable sums we lose in depreciation.
Saw a 40th Anniv CL65 live and thought paint was too "LA" (esp Calabasas/NwptCoast

) for my taste (esp in bright CA sun)....But I also view Silver Arrow paint of SL63 030 launch ed as being too gaudy for my tastes....prefer more subtle iridium silver w/blk leather and cf....
Always a difficult balance of configuring stuff for guys who've owned/driven many interesting cars and have no interest in advertising selves/cars....vs first-time buyers who (sometimes) are seeking attention....real-world marketing trade-offs suck.....problem is most MB/AMG marketers don't seem to realize that their repeat buyer base is fairly divergent from one-off buyers in terms of tastes; most repeat CL buyers have no aspirations to ever be ricers/rappers....
I think the CL600 with its stock wheels and simple fascia looks somehow lacking (no offense to CL600 owners...it might by my somewhat immature taste...being 36 y/o). I don't think the Carlsson package is overdone at all. I think it provides a solution for CL600 owners who do not have the AMG package available (or don't necessarily like how sport-packaged CL550's, CL63's and CL65's all share the same body kit). I think some detractors fail to remember that even AMG was an aftermarket provider before it was taken in-house...and they had some pretty profound ...somwhat outlandish looking products back in the day. Good luck with your beautiful new ride!!!
As others have asked...how does ECU upgrade compare with your stock 07 CL600?
Tom
Last edited by TMC M5; May 20, 2008 at 04:18 PM.

Well said.....all of these aftermkt things...or even much of mfr-spec'd stuff... end up looking/sounding like "trying too hard"....the delicate (or not-so-delicate
) balance btwn interesting perf stuff and stuff that's trailer pk (or whatever mockable ghetto) deluxe....reality is most buyers are trying to buy an "image", though many don't realize which image they've opted for the 63bought....
. And I believe I definitely know the image that I bought
Here be the judge.
https://mbworld.org/forums/cl55-amg-cl65-amg-cl63-amg-c215-c216/244997-updated-pics-my-fav-toy.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/s55-amg-s65-amg-s63-amg-w220-w221/244189-my-s63-new-shoes.html





Well said.....all of these aftermkt things...or even much of mfr-spec'd stuff... end up looking/sounding like "trying too hard"....the delicate (or not-so-delicate
) balance btwn interesting perf stuff and stuff that's trailer pk (or whatever mockable ghetto) deluxe....reality is most buyers are trying to buy an "image", though many don't realize which image they've bought....
Well... I tend to agree with WSH and ColdWater.
I too test drove (back to back) both 63 and 600 and chose 600. Torque for such a heavy cars is EVERYTHING.
I guess if you want
Fast looking car -> 63
Fast car -> 600.
Case closed. For me at least.
Both Fast and Fast Looking -> 65

Tom
anyway, silverarrow, the car looks really good, very clean and not overdone... good job...


