mercedes w216 CL63 or Maserati Gransport
0-100 4.8 secs
4.2 litre v8
top speed 180mph
Kerb Weight (kg) 1680
Gross Vehicle Mass (kg) 2060
power 400hp 451Nm
price 25-30k uk pounds depending on mileage
seems to be appreciating in value due to low production numbers
mercedes w216 CL63 amg (2007-2010)
6.2 litre v8
Power 525 bhp 630Nm
0-100 4.6 secs
Kerb Weight (kg) 2085
Gross Vehicle Mass (kg) 2510
Top speed 155mph limited
price 22-29 k uk pounds depending on miles
both cars have 4.2-4.4 out of 5 stars owner reviews on autotrader.co.uk
its difficult to choose which car to buy. Any help on pros and cons of each car would be helpful. Pictures are of
the two cars currently for sale that I am deciding between.
Last edited by lambo5321; Jun 2, 2016 at 02:00 AM.
With out a doubt the DB9 should be your first choice of the three. If you CAN find a CL550 of CL500 in the UK with the facelift, buy it! Try and find one that is stock and hasn't been modified. I find anytime you see one modified, such as the wheels or body cladding, they usually have been run hard. You can expect to have a lot of issues, that will cost you even more money, than a new better looking car. The first two just look dated.
I did go back and look at the cars your looking at. The Maserati is in CA, the Mercedes is in Europe, and the Aston Martin is at Redline in Glendale.
Last edited by 2014CL600; Jun 9, 2016 at 07:14 PM.
With out a doubt the DB9 should be your first choice of the three. If you CAN find a CL550 of CL500 in the UK with the facelift, buy it! Try and find one that is stock and hasn't been modified. I find anytime you see one modified, such as the wheels or body cladding, they usually have been run hard. You can expect to have a lot of issues, that will cost you even more money, than a new better looking car. The first two just look dated.
I did go back and look at the cars your looking at. The Maserati is in CA, the Mercedes is in Europe, and the Aston Martin is at Redline in Glendale.
Heres links to the actual cars 2011 cl63 with amg performance pack is 10k gbp more than 2007 cl63 amg.
2011 cl63 amg amg performance pack/carbon pack
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...l=cl&logcode=p
red 2004 maserati gransport
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifie...c#&gid=1&pid=1
2007 cl63 amg carbon pack/ tanzanite blue only done 20k miles
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...l=cl&logcode=p
Last edited by lambo5321; Jun 10, 2016 at 06:50 AM.
Last edited by 2014CL600; Jun 10, 2016 at 10:50 AM.
Its alot cheaper 2nd hand than CL63 has a v12 twin turbo but no amg tuning and brakes which are better for the track. I am going to go with the 2007 cl63 I think.
These CL600s have dropped alot more in value than the CL63 amgs and both were the same price new. This is the case for 07-10 and 11-14, is it just because no amg badge.
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...code=p&adPos=6
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...code=p&adPos=7
Last edited by lambo5321; Jun 20, 2016 at 11:05 PM.
Trending Topics
Also, the 63 with every option was always cheaper than a designo 600.
It's just like the Bentley GT cost more and is worth more than its counter part V8.
Last edited by 2014CL600; Jun 20, 2016 at 11:12 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
http://www.autozine.org/Archive/Merc...d/CL_C216.html the CL600 was 106,000 gbp and cl63 was 105,000 gbp.
Last edited by lambo5321; Jun 20, 2016 at 11:17 PM.
Last edited by 2014CL600; Jun 21, 2016 at 02:13 AM.
According to the article in my previous reply. I think these CL's are exceptional cars and huge respect man for buying a 2014 in their final year of production. You are right its very difficult to find face lift CL600, there are however facelift CL65s
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...code=p&adPos=7
Also heres a reasonable CL600 2007 http://www.pistonheads.com/classifie...ol/5738300?v=c
And here is a 2007 CL63 AMG with more miles
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...ode=p&adPos=10
Last edited by lambo5321; Jun 21, 2016 at 02:51 AM.
I was looking at 2011-2012 CL550 or 2008-2009 CL63. I bought the 63 and I absolutely love the car. I have, afterwards, driven 2012 CL550 and 2011 CL600, both with facelift. I found out that AMG is different to both, feels more special, handles a lot better, it is sportier, louder, gives you sportier experience. Would I trade my CL63 pre-face to a facelift non-AMG model? Never. The 550 is just too ordinary, the 600 to me is just the 550 with the bigger engine that is only about torque, otherwise very quiet, relatively boring engine (sure it is very fast, but the way, it delivers power, is very different to an AMG engine).
I also find quite funny the fact, that some of my friends, who bought facelift CL's (non-AMG), liked my car a lot more than theirs. In case of equipment and technology, pre-face and facelift have some differences, but you won't notice during your every day life. Some functions like Split View and other are available in 2009+ prefacelift CL63.
So, my advice would be go for a facelift 63 AMG with 5.5 Bi-Turbo and if that is too expensive, go for the 6.2 N/A 63 pre-facelift.
Speaking of Maserati, forget about it, it is not even close - interior, dynamics, quality.
Last edited by GMBALL; Jul 29, 2016 at 07:28 AM.
because here in Europe (Germany), the 600 is cheaper than 63 by relatively noticeable amount of money. I can buy 600 from 2007 for about 10k USD less than CL63 from 2007. Nobody wants the 600 here. Also, we don't get CL63 without ABC, I have never heard or seen anyone with 63 and Airmatic. I have, on the other hand, seen CL600 with airmatic and a lot smaller brakes compared to an AMG.
Last edited by GMBALL; Jul 29, 2016 at 07:33 AM.
Last edited by 2014CL600; Jul 31, 2016 at 02:23 PM.
Just thought Id share a little something that I exchanged my Old man Bentley for last month. So now I have a Super luxury car that is had been tuned and a Super Sport luxury that has been Super tuned.
I was looking at 2011-2012 CL550 or 2008-2009 CL63. I bought the 63 and I absolutely love the car. I have, afterwards, driven 2012 CL550 and 2011 CL600, both with facelift. I found out that AMG is different to both, feels more special, handles a lot better, it is sportier, louder, gives you sportier experience. Would I trade my CL63 pre-face to a facelift non-AMG model? Never. The 550 is just too ordinary, the 600 to me is just the 550 with the bigger engine that is only about torque, otherwise very quiet, relatively boring engine (sure it is very fast, but the way, it delivers power, is very different to an AMG engine).
I also find quite funny the fact, that some of my friends, who bought facelift CL's (non-AMG), liked my car a lot more than theirs. In case of equipment and technology, pre-face and facelift have some differences, but you won't notice during your every day life. Some functions like Split View and other are available in 2009+ prefacelift CL63.
So, my advice would be go for a facelift 63 AMG with 5.5 Bi-Turbo and if that is too expensive, go for the 6.2 N/A 63 pre-facelift.
Speaking of Maserati, forget about it, it is not even close - interior, dynamics, quality.
Yes, I actually like the Designo Mystic Blue. I didn't think I did but it has grown on me. You mentioned there was no difference between the 500/550 but a 550 is nothing even close to a 600. The 600 has a fully active hydraulic suspension, the interior has a different leather and sew pattern, Alcontera headliner that is sewn to match the seats, full leather interior through out, RWD and torque to beat the band. The CL500/550 has MB Tex interior except for seat surfaces, arm rest and steering wheel. The headliner is cloth the suspension is Airmatic/4matic on 11-14 models (10-13 in EU). The base is about 60K US dollars less before adding options. So, there is a massive difference in the two cars. The 63 unless ordered with a Designo interior, also has MB Tex interior except for the afore mentioned. These things to me are important. Some people could careless. I like more refinement and distinction. Again, it's personal preference. I am not judging. I am just saying, Id rather have a facelifted car over a non face lifted car and a 600 over a 550 or 63, that's all. My car may be boaring to some but to me it perfect (except Id rather have it in Designo Mystic Red)
Last edited by 2014CL600; Jul 31, 2016 at 02:41 PM.



Yes, you are absolutely right! Your car IS boring! ;-)
BTW, so you know, NA CL63 all come with premium leather, alcantera and stitching.
AMG cars can't be compared to non-AMG even if the latter is packing TT V12 under the hood...
I was looking at 2011-2012 CL550 or 2008-2009 CL63. I bought the 63 and I absolutely love the car. I have, afterwards, driven 2012 CL550 and 2011 CL600, both with facelift. I found out that AMG is different to both, feels more special, handles a lot better, it is sportier, louder, gives you sportier experience. Would I trade my CL63 pre-face to a facelift non-AMG model? Never. The 550 is just too ordinary, the 600 to me is just the 550 with the bigger engine that is only about torque, otherwise very quiet, relatively boring engine (sure it is very fast, but the way, it delivers power, is very different to an AMG engine).
I also find quite funny the fact, that some of my friends, who bought facelift CL's (non-AMG), liked my car a lot more than theirs. In case of equipment and technology, pre-face and facelift have some differences, but you won't notice during your every day life. Some functions like Split View and other are available in 2009+ prefacelift CL63.
So, my advice would be go for a facelift 63 AMG with 5.5 Bi-Turbo and if that is too expensive, go for the 6.2 N/A 63 pre-facelift.
Speaking of Maserati, forget about it, it is not even close - interior, dynamics, quality.
Wow...awesome colour...anyway...i had EXACTELY the same problem when I had to choose between a CL500 biturbo facelift and the CL63 AMG 2008...in the and the AMG was the way to go for me...the facelift just looked to "ordinary" and did not inspired me in any way...as the power goes...in spring I will go with the Weistec Supercharger...end of the story... Take care and choose with the heart...







