S63 vs CL63
I guess when I decide to get another 4 door car I will be always be known for driving a boring car.
Trending Topics




The Best of Mercedes & AMG
god sure glad you're a member with your illuminating views...

Stealthy cars like fast wagons, sedans and suv's can be some of the most fun drives in their own way... but those who aren't true enthusiasts will never understand this as they just want the bling...
-Rob


IMO, the S63 looks better than the CL63 with that bland Toyota Solara rear end.
The S63 also has more presence on the road.
I personally don't see the point of the CL, and it seems like most agree... which is why the CL is the 2nd lowest selling MB model to date.
IMO, the S63 looks better than the CL63 with that bland Toyota Solara rear end.
The S63 also has more presence on the road.
I personally don't see the point of the CL, and it seems like most agree... which is why the CL is the 2nd lowest selling MB model to date.
Maybe if you guys were right about 4 doors being cool we'd see 911 4 doors and vette 4 doors and Veyron 4 doors (I can go on forever as you can see) I'm relentless


Maybe if you guys were right about 4 doors being cool we'd see 911 4 doors and vette 4 doors and Veyron 4 doors (I can go on forever as you can see) I'm relentless



The Veyron isn't a mass produced car, it's a unique 2 million dollar car.
If 4 doors are so boring why did Porsche and Aston Martin just create one?
Maybe if you guys were right about 4 doors being cool we'd see 911 4 doors and vette 4 doors and Veyron 4 doors (I can go on forever as you can see) I'm relentless



Is the CL63 stealthy? I dislike flash and love stealth .
If you don't need the rear seats of the sedan go with the coupe!
Sprins votes CL AMG baby
S AMG is for the family and CL AMG is for the MAN
Needing 4 doors would mean you have people in the back seat often enough that it's a hassle and, if you bought a coupe, you would routinely wish you had a sedan.
Excluding the convenience factor, the CL is, on paper, a better car. It has generally the same features but is marginally lighter, better handling, etc. The CL will get more attention because it is much rarer and, while the S class is driven by everything from soccer moms to foreign dignitaries, the CL is, well, driven by Charlie Sheen's character on Two and a Half Men.
With that said, I will likely eventually trade my CL for an S because the convenience factor, for me, will eventually outweigh the small advantages of the CL.
The real question is not S vs CL, it's why get a 63? The 55, 600, and 65 all appear to be better engine choices for either car. If you're looking at new, really want AMG styling, and can't swing/justify a 65, I would look at a CPO 65 for probably less money than a new 63.
Needing 4 doors would mean you have people in the back seat often enough that it's a hassle and, if you bought a coupe, you would routinely wish you had a sedan.
Excluding the convenience factor, the CL is, on paper, a better car. It has generally the same features but is marginally lighter, better handling, etc. The CL will get more attention because it is much rarer and, while the S class is driven by everything from soccer moms to foreign dignitaries, the CL is, well, driven by Charlie Sheen's character on Two and a Half Men.
With that said, I will likely eventually trade my CL for an S because the convenience factor, for me, will eventually outweigh the small advantages of the CL.
The real question is not S vs CL, it's why get a 63? The 55, 600, and 65 all appear to be better engine choices for either car. If you're looking at new, really want AMG styling, and can't swing/justify a 65, I would look at a CPO 65 for probably less money than a new 63.
end of discussion.. cl the guy's car ... s class the gang's car







