CL65(215) v M5(F10)
#3
That's good. The reason I was asking is a guy not that far away from me just bought one and I know at some point it will end up in a lively race and I don't want to be looking silly if you know what I mean!
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,630
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
W215 V12TT Build by Speedriven, W221 S550 4Matic
I think tunes are down on price now if you get a tune only your car will def get up and go. Even without a tune you should have him covered no issues. Make sure its a roll race
#5
Nice car and mods you have done to your motor, brilliant stuff!
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
0-60 MPH in the M5 F10 is listed as 3.6 seconds, so don't expect to take it from a dig.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M5#...0.93present.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M5#...0.93present.29
Trending Topics
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
How do you say Bus lengths? See this video... If the 65 is flashed it's lights out.
I believe Video is stock vs Stock.
HD: Mercedes S65 AMG vs BMW M5 Touring 50-295 km/h : M5BOARD.com - YouTube
I believe Video is stock vs Stock.
HD: Mercedes S65 AMG vs BMW M5 Touring 50-295 km/h : M5BOARD.com - YouTube
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yes but it's also an S65 which is heavier & slower than a CL. Even a TT V-8 M5 is going to have a tough time with a roll race against a CL65. Throw a tune on one or the other and the stock car will probably loose every time.
#13
How about the OP just ask for a friendly race and take some videos for us...LOL Don't talk smack, you never know, the 65 is a 10 yr old platform. Sadly the king of one era may get beat by a 22 speed V8TT that just sits in the sweet spot for RPMs. Don't get me wrong I still love my car, but you gotta respect the technology as time goes on. There is only one way to find out, and every car can have a good or bad driver.
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes
on
21 Posts
06 SL65AMG, 13 Tesla Model S 60kwh, 02 Jaguar S-Type 3.0, 12 S550 4 Matic, 07 E320 Bluetec, 06 LX470
It would be a good race stock vs stock or tune vs tune. I raced an F10 on my SL65 but that's the lightest of the 4 65s, But those F10s are quick from the dig
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,630
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
W215 V12TT Build by Speedriven, W221 S550 4Matic
How about the OP just ask for a friendly race and take some videos for us...LOL Don't talk smack, you never know, the 65 is a 10 yr old platform. Sadly the king of one era may get beat by a 22 speed V8TT that just sits in the sweet spot for RPMs. Don't get me wrong I still love my car, but you gotta respect the technology as time goes on. There is only one way to find out, and every car can have a good or bad driver.
#16
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes
on
21 Posts
06 SL65AMG, 13 Tesla Model S 60kwh, 02 Jaguar S-Type 3.0, 12 S550 4 Matic, 07 E320 Bluetec, 06 LX470
Usually after you tune the 600/65 I notice ppl see their ignition coils to go out much faster. Once day after this 370z was trying to mess with me and I was bus lengths ahead car got really rough and CEL came on. Turned the car off and on after I was off the highway and it wasn't rough anymore but CEL was still on.
I went to my indy the next day did a quick scan and it showed 10/12 cylinders had a misfire lol
I went to my indy the next day did a quick scan and it showed 10/12 cylinders had a misfire lol
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,630
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
W215 V12TT Build by Speedriven, W221 S550 4Matic
Usually after you tune the 600/65 I notice ppl see their ignition coils to go out much faster. Once day after this 370z was trying to mess with me and I was bus lengths ahead car got really rough and CEL came on. Turned the car off and on after I was off the highway and it wasn't rough anymore but CEL was still on.
I went to my indy the next day did a quick scan and it showed 10/12 cylinders had a misfire lol
I went to my indy the next day did a quick scan and it showed 10/12 cylinders had a misfire lol
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Do you recall the PM I sent you specifically about this? I replaced mine prior to installing my tune with Autozone coils that come with a lifetime warranty. I then listed my perfectly funtioning used coils on ebay, of which one has already sold. Just food for thought when it comes to tuning these cars and the effects on the coils.
If you're getting a tune, install warrantied coils and sell the old coils before they fail and are worthless.
Last edited by Grip Grip; 06-27-2014 at 09:02 PM.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: murfreesboro,tn
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 porsche 996 turbo
did some checking. the car was a 2014 m5 with the bmw competition package and an exhaust. with the exhaust i guess not completely stock but thats all. no other mods
Last edited by 320 dreamer; 06-28-2014 at 03:55 PM.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-26436.html
Down Pipes, exhaust, Burger tuning, on 93/100 oct mix... 11.07 at 128 mph
320 dreamer.. This 2013 m5 has some nice mods etc & DynoJet results were 638 rwhp (DJ are very comparable) hard to believe all mods above only adds 47 whp IE vs stock m5 you note having 591 rwhp
Down Pipes, exhaust, Burger tuning, on 93/100 oct mix... 11.07 at 128 mph
320 dreamer.. This 2013 m5 has some nice mods etc & DynoJet results were 638 rwhp (DJ are very comparable) hard to believe all mods above only adds 47 whp IE vs stock m5 you note having 591 rwhp
Last edited by Thericker; 06-28-2014 at 04:48 PM.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: murfreesboro,tn
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 porsche 996 turbo
Http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-26436.html
Down Pipes, exhaust, Burger tuning, on 93/100 oct mix... 11.07 at 128 mph
320 dreamer.. This 2013 m5 has some nice mods etc & DynoJet results were 638 rwhp (DJ are very comparable) hard to believe all mods above only adds 47 whp IE vs stock m5 you note having 591 rwhp
Down Pipes, exhaust, Burger tuning, on 93/100 oct mix... 11.07 at 128 mph
320 dreamer.. This 2013 m5 has some nice mods etc & DynoJet results were 638 rwhp (DJ are very comparable) hard to believe all mods above only adds 47 whp IE vs stock m5 you note having 591 rwhp
we have a dyne contest every yr at this event and he won the v8 and up category. i watched the run and ran mine next.
do the 2013 and 2014 have the same motor?
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
These modded 2013 m5's show it's pretty much impossible to make 591 whp in STOCK form.. Here's another m5 '13 w/down pipes, full exhaust, 98 octane, and ecu made 553 whp..
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-25483.html
A ton of dyno machines are either setup improperly or on load bareing dynos improper vehicle data is entered = extremely happy hp/tq numbers that mean squat..
2013/2014 share same 4.4 liter TT engine, the 14' model showed 15 BHP more @ 575 BHP vs 560 BHP.. That must be the difference Though it appears to be in PP factory tuning, after BOTH models are equally tuned by aftermarket companies this variance would be erased etc..
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-25483.html
A ton of dyno machines are either setup improperly or on load bareing dynos improper vehicle data is entered = extremely happy hp/tq numbers that mean squat..
2013/2014 share same 4.4 liter TT engine, the 14' model showed 15 BHP more @ 575 BHP vs 560 BHP.. That must be the difference Though it appears to be in PP factory tuning, after BOTH models are equally tuned by aftermarket companies this variance would be erased etc..
Last edited by Thericker; 06-28-2014 at 05:52 PM.
#25
Super Member
My stock 2013 M5 put down 560 rwhp on a dynojet. It was at a dyno day and a OE tuned 2013 C63 put down 411 hp so it wasn't a high reader. Looking through their dyno files there was a SL65 on that same dyno and it didn't quite break 500 rwhp. Used to have an SL65 and on a different dyno it did 528 rwhp. SL65 was still heavier than the M5 is. Stock for stock the even heavier CL65 wouldn't keep up with a new M5.