Newbie CLK Owner to Be......
(1) 99 320, lease buyout from colleague, 35,000 miles (warranty expires in April), silver/charcoal, k3, cd changer, $27,000 - drawback is that this guy has been putting 87 octane fuel in it - why, I do not know...... or
(2) 2002 320, 25K miles, warranty will expire w/ miles before time I think, silver/ash, k3, cd, multi contour seats (?), $37,000 (private party trying to sell before he has to trade it in)
So my dilemna is, is $10K worth 3 years newer, ~20K mile warranty, 10K fewer miles?
Your thoughts and comments will be much appreciated...
he put 87 octane cause it was a lease and he didn't care for performance, so 87 octane will save him money and leave the troubles it creates to the new owner.
if you gonna take the plunge, go with the '02.
Anyhow, I bought mine used also. It's a 02' 320, no complaints..i always wanted one, and thankfully, it was a good choice.. good luck w/ your purchase and let us know how it goes..cheers..
djamer
Trending Topics
As for the 87 gas not my choice either and it probably indicates that the owner has abused the car! In theory the knock sensors will take care of the 87 gas. I place more faith in MB than an owner thats real cheap so thats another vote for the 02.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I'm sure I'll have more questions once I'm actually driving it.
Thanks again.


