Hersh's Turbo CLK430 Build Thread
It's got a flexible, steel supported, silicon intake made for Turbo P-cars. It's heat wrapped at the point it crosses over the also-wrapped exhaust just to be safe. The MAF is back there too. His painted tip didn't fair too well with the heat from my MIG welder lol.

You can see the filter in this pic:
Last edited by Max Hughes; Oct 9, 2009 at 01:35 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Greg
Greg
coud you help me with this.
you would give a wery big help. thanks
heres some pics of the cat removal, cat guttin and some random pics of the full setup once i got to finally see it actually up on a lift...









The silver thing is the sparkplug nonfouler:






Clearly, performance of the turbine is in part determined by the temperature of the exhaust gasses. It is reasonable, then, to expend some effort toward getting the exhaust gas from the combustion chamber to the turbine with the least possible temperature loss.
And
Exhaust manifold design is one of the keys to high power output, and the two-turbo layout inherently offers superior manifold design. The heat loss of the cross tube in V-style engines can be considerable. Remember, it is in part this heat that powers the turbine.
By the time it reaches that rear mounted turbo, the exhaust loses a lot of heat. The rear half of your exhaust is wrapped. You might want to look into using header wrap in the front half of the exhaust as well.
The only company I know of that successfully ran a pipe a long way to their turbo was Porsche with the 951. The engine was a cross flow inline four with the turbo mounted on the intake side.
since there has been few w208 owner that have went the turbo route on the clk, maybe you guys can direct me on my thought of getting a single turbo installed.
I have w209 03 CLK500 and highly considering going the turbo route (t3 and only running no more the 6-8 psi). My question is what would I need to upgrade on my CLK500 for my 500 to handle the turbo? And what would I actually need?
Thank you guys
Last edited by riarm; Oct 27, 2009 at 04:53 PM.
Clearly, performance of the turbine is in part determined by the temperature of the exhaust gasses. It is reasonable, then, to expend some effort toward getting the exhaust gas from the combustion chamber to the turbine with the least possible temperature loss.
And
Exhaust manifold design is one of the keys to high power output, and the two-turbo layout inherently offers superior manifold design. The heat loss of the cross tube in V-style engines can be considerable. Remember, it is in part this heat that powers the turbine.
By the time it reaches that rear mounted turbo, the exhaust loses a lot of heat. The rear half of your exhaust is wrapped. You might want to look into using header wrap in the front half of the exhaust as well.
The only company I know of that successfully ran a pipe a long way to their turbo was Porsche with the 951. The engine was a cross flow inline four with the turbo mounted on the intake side.
The rear mounted turbo set up is not a new thing that Max has made up and Porsche is not the only company that has had success with this type of set up.
Here is one video example of an install with success with dyno numbers as well. There are many examples of this type of set up by STS if you check out the videos that come up with this one after viewing it.
2 Guys Garage single rear mount turbo install ( good one to watch in it's entirety )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnFA9...rom=PL&index=6
STS Rear Mount Turbo Corvette with narration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtkpL...72F8AB&index=0
Last edited by CLK FAN; Oct 28, 2009 at 01:59 AM.









