W208 CLK vs. w209 CLK
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
W208 CLK vs. w209 CLK
Big fan of the CLK here, I was wondering how much different are the first gen CLK's vs. the new W209 that just came out...For those who have ridden in both, what's the most distinguishable about them...For me personally, I love the interior of the W208 vs. the W209, it feels more substantial and less like the Current C-Class interior which the W209 resembles....Overall, is the new version that much better than the old version? thoughts?
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 14,362
Likes: 1
From: Staples Center
w211 & w124
There was a real good discussion about this recently but I believe it was lost in the crash. The bottom line is that you will see in this forum, most people will opt for the w208. Based on the exterior, the w208 just has more masculine lines compared to the w209. Also, the new CLK has way too many similarities to the C-Class for my liking. Although the CLK and the C-Class share the same chassis, the w208 borrowed most of its exterior styling from the E-Class, which made it stand out a little more.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
A bucket on wheels
ive had both cars and traded in my previou clk320 for my current. here are my views, they could be completely different from others
w208 feels much sportier, looks more aggressive and felt a little bit quicker.
w209. work of art. It might not be as sporty but it looks incredible, it feels more comfortable. Its an updated version obviously so all the things that went wrong in the w208 were replaced and changed. Also, cruising down LA, with all the windows down is something the w208 could not accomplish. If your looking to buy one of the two, look at how much money you are willing to spend and if you are looking for speed you can get a clk430 for example for instead of a new clk320. But if speed does not matter and you just want to kick back and cruise get the w209
w208 feels much sportier, looks more aggressive and felt a little bit quicker.
w209. work of art. It might not be as sporty but it looks incredible, it feels more comfortable. Its an updated version obviously so all the things that went wrong in the w208 were replaced and changed. Also, cruising down LA, with all the windows down is something the w208 could not accomplish. If your looking to buy one of the two, look at how much money you are willing to spend and if you are looking for speed you can get a clk430 for example for instead of a new clk320. But if speed does not matter and you just want to kick back and cruise get the w209
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Honestly, I'm sure the W209 drives better than the W208. I just can't get over the W209's aesthetics. They took a CLK that looked like a German muscle car and and made it look like a car that looks at home sitting outside a grocery store. That's obviously just my opinion, however, I have heard that sentiment echoed by dealerships, tuners and reviewers as well. You can always do what I did and get a W208 and make it perform the way you want.... but that's not practical for most people.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,734
Likes: 65
From: Hotlanta
AMG
Re: W208 CLK vs. w209 CLK
Originally posted by c230pete
Overall, is the new version that much better than the old version? thoughts?
Overall, is the new version that much better than the old version? thoughts?
I may have gone for the W209 instead of the W208 (CLK55) I purchased instead, except for the following reasons:
1. My 2002 CLK is the last model year. Most of the kinks had been worked out of this model by the time I purchased. New models (the W209) have their own set of problems.
2. Exterior style. The 208 is aggressive....the 209 is sleek. Both nice, but I prefer the 208. I also have a W124 coupe if I want all 4 windows to go down
3. Interior style. I've owned MBs exclusively since 1990. I prefer (and was more familiar with) the dash layout and functions of the 208 over the 209. I didn't care for the whole "oval theme".....steering wheels buttons, dash vents, etc. in the 209.
4. "Heritage". Maybe this is just me. But, after lusting after the 560SEC (W126 coupe), I ALWAYS felt like the grill star on a coupe belongs on the top-of-the-line coupe ONLY (in addition to the SL of course)...in the current scenario that would be the CL. I disagree with MBs decision to put a grill star on the C-class coupe, the ML, and the 209-CLK.
5. The 208 CLK55 came LOADED. There were only three options offered (Comand/CD/Phone)....the rear sunshade, xenons, pneumatic seats, even the ski sack....all STANDARD. With the 209 CLK55, you have to pay extra for many of the items that came on the 208 as part of the package.
Granted, I made my decision and purchased the 208. I am biased......but do I regret my decision? Not even for a second.
Last edited by Chappy; Jan 13, 2004 at 05:04 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,289
Likes: 9
From: So Cal
W213 '17 E43 ///AMG - W211, W208 no more
Re: W208 CLK vs. w209 CLK
Originally posted by c230pete
Big fan of the CLK here, I was wondering how much different are the first gen CLK's vs. the new W209 that just came out...For those who have ridden in both, what's the most distinguishable about them...For me personally, I love the interior of the W208 vs. the W209, it feels more substantial and less like the Current C-Class interior which the W209 resembles....Overall, is the new version that much better than the old version? thoughts?
Big fan of the CLK here, I was wondering how much different are the first gen CLK's vs. the new W209 that just came out...For those who have ridden in both, what's the most distinguishable about them...For me personally, I love the interior of the W208 vs. the W209, it feels more substantial and less like the Current C-Class interior which the W209 resembles....Overall, is the new version that much better than the old version? thoughts?
btw, if you came to this forum to look for an unbiased opinion, i think you came to the wrong place... i will assure you that probably 90%+ of w208 owners here won't trade their w208 for the w209 replacement in the same category (v6/v8/amg)....
i would never sell out and get a w209... not until they do something about that ***...
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley
Well summarized Chappy! Another missing item to the "Heritage" catagory is the single arm windshield wiper. It's kinda sad that all of the new MB have lost that distinguished design.
And if you want all 4 windows to go down on a 208, get the cab.
And if you want all 4 windows to go down on a 208, get the cab.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Wash, DC
CLS550
my mom bought a new W209-320
i got a used W208-55
but if price were the same i'd have got the w209-55 (assuming i couldnt just get a w211-55)
***
209-55
cons: looks like a sedan (smaller c-pillar, bigger rear quarter window), family resemblance w/ c-coupe
pros: family resemblance w/ SL, faster, interior is nicer to me (silver accents, amg label on seats, rear-vents, window controls on door), more options (keylessgo, vented seats, ...), cross-drilled brakes, projection HID, shift buttons on steering wheel.
208-55:
cons: older platform (recirculted ball steering...)
pro: looks meaner/sportier
***
thats all i can think right now
i got a used W208-55
but if price were the same i'd have got the w209-55 (assuming i couldnt just get a w211-55)
***
209-55
cons: looks like a sedan (smaller c-pillar, bigger rear quarter window), family resemblance w/ c-coupe
pros: family resemblance w/ SL, faster, interior is nicer to me (silver accents, amg label on seats, rear-vents, window controls on door), more options (keylessgo, vented seats, ...), cross-drilled brakes, projection HID, shift buttons on steering wheel.
208-55:
cons: older platform (recirculted ball steering...)
pro: looks meaner/sportier
***
thats all i can think right now
Last edited by MagmaSilk; Jan 13, 2004 at 05:28 PM.
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco area
'03CLK500,13 Panamera GTS,00 BOXSTER,96CARRERA CAB
208 vs 209
I happen to have both...A 99 CLK320 and a 2003 CLK500.
For the most part, I aggree with much of what has already been said. I would like to add the following:
1. The 209 looks great (to me). With the windows down there is nothing like it (except the CL). I have had other MBZ coupes before, and it really bothered me that my 208 had fixed rear windows and a B pillar. The front end looks awesome.
2. The 209 has better performance. Rack and pinion steering is tighter and more responsive.
3. The 208 has a nicer interior design. I can't complain (like some do) about the 209 interior, I just prefer the 208.
4. The stereo (Bose) sucks big time in both cars..I can't stand the automatic volume changes.
5. Short of the CLK55, the CLK500 goes like crazy. (0-62 in 5.7 seconds is pretty quick).
6. The AMG wheels on the CLK500 look great and seem to be lighter.
7. The 209 has more interior room
For the most part, I aggree with much of what has already been said. I would like to add the following:
1. The 209 looks great (to me). With the windows down there is nothing like it (except the CL). I have had other MBZ coupes before, and it really bothered me that my 208 had fixed rear windows and a B pillar. The front end looks awesome.
2. The 209 has better performance. Rack and pinion steering is tighter and more responsive.
3. The 208 has a nicer interior design. I can't complain (like some do) about the 209 interior, I just prefer the 208.
4. The stereo (Bose) sucks big time in both cars..I can't stand the automatic volume changes.
5. Short of the CLK55, the CLK500 goes like crazy. (0-62 in 5.7 seconds is pretty quick).
6. The AMG wheels on the CLK500 look great and seem to be lighter.
7. The 209 has more interior room
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,289
Likes: 9
From: So Cal
W213 '17 E43 ///AMG - W211, W208 no more
Originally posted by thuged_out
W208 adv > looks, maybe int
W209 adv > everything else
I bought my car for the looks, and even though W209 looks nice, it just doesnt look nice enough for me to trade it with my w208
W208 adv > looks, maybe int
W209 adv > everything else
I bought my car for the looks, and even though W209 looks nice, it just doesnt look nice enough for me to trade it with my w208
W208 = looks & appearance
W209 = functionality
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
2003 CLK Convertible
W209 Coupe=Boring
W209 Convertible Top Up=Boring
W209 Convertible Top Down=Stunning!!!
W208 Coupe=Tough!!
W208 Convertible Top up or Down=Coolest!!!
2003 W208 Convertible Quartz Blue (don't remember top color cause its always down) oh yeh..it's blue too.
W209 Convertible Top Up=Boring
W209 Convertible Top Down=Stunning!!!
W208 Coupe=Tough!!
W208 Convertible Top up or Down=Coolest!!!
2003 W208 Convertible Quartz Blue (don't remember top color cause its always down) oh yeh..it's blue too.
MBworld Guru
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
W209 has a more advance chassi, a little heavier, less bulky looking (IMO), more power (if u look at 430 vs 500), etc.
W208 was built on the W202 chassi which is already 4-5 yrs old when the W208 was introduced. Can't really find fault w/ the car other than it has no steering feedback whatsoever. I like the interior of the W208 tho because it feel less similar to the W202 C-class unlike the W209/W203 w/ those center dash mount buttons and etc.
Personally I'd pick the W209, but just can't get pass those W203-ish interior which doesn't make me want to spent the same amount of money when you can get a E-class. So, I'll stay w/ the W208. My sister's 00 CLK320 is doing just fine. Something about that car just makes you feel different when you drive it.
W208 was built on the W202 chassi which is already 4-5 yrs old when the W208 was introduced. Can't really find fault w/ the car other than it has no steering feedback whatsoever. I like the interior of the W208 tho because it feel less similar to the W202 C-class unlike the W209/W203 w/ those center dash mount buttons and etc.
Personally I'd pick the W209, but just can't get pass those W203-ish interior which doesn't make me want to spent the same amount of money when you can get a E-class. So, I'll stay w/ the W208. My sister's 00 CLK320 is doing just fine. Something about that car just makes you feel different when you drive it.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 53
From: Georgia
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
I think most all these are ....
on target. 209 is just too feminine and has too much Accord in it. I've seen some nice looking 209's, but they take So much work to get right (coilovers, 19's, aero) and with the market in the tank like it is now, I'd think the 208 would be safer buy (less to tumble than the 209, which is doing nothing saleswise in most markets). Just my 02....
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,734
Likes: 65
From: Hotlanta
AMG
Re: I think most all these are ....
Originally posted by allenjdmb
209 is just too feminine and has too much Accord in it.
209 is just too feminine and has too much Accord in it.
BTW, the *only* W209 coupe I would spring for would be the CLK55 that AMGBRED has perfected.
Super Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: vancouver
Originally posted by Josh K
If you want a Mercedes, get a 208. If you want a Honda Accord/Volvo/Acura CL/(insert generic car name here) go for the 209. ;0)
If you want a Mercedes, get a 208. If you want a Honda Accord/Volvo/Acura CL/(insert generic car name here) go for the 209. ;0)
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
W209
YEs i would agree. the older 208 look nicer. The new W209 looks femmine however, if you fix it up and smack a brabus kit with the quad fogs up on there....and put some 19's, the it has BALLSSS
Stock W208=Nice
Stock W209=Femmine
W208 fixed up=very NICE
W209 fixed up=DAM NICE
I think in conclusion, keep the rear of the 208 and have the front of the 209. That is what i would like too have.
Stock W208=Nice
Stock W209=Femmine
W208 fixed up=very NICE
W209 fixed up=DAM NICE
I think in conclusion, keep the rear of the 208 and have the front of the 209. That is what i would like too have.
Last edited by BrabusClK04; Jan 16, 2004 at 03:17 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Los Angelos
Originally posted by BrabusClK04
YEs i would agree. the older 208 look nicer. The new W209 looks femmine however, if you fix it up and smack a brabus kit with the quad fogs up on there....and put some 19's, its had BALLSSS
Stock W208=Nice
Stock W209=Femmine
W208 fixed up=very NICE
W209 fixed up=DAM NICE
YEs i would agree. the older 208 look nicer. The new W209 looks femmine however, if you fix it up and smack a brabus kit with the quad fogs up on there....and put some 19's, its had BALLSSS
Stock W208=Nice
Stock W209=Femmine
W208 fixed up=very NICE
W209 fixed up=DAM NICE
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,289
Likes: 9
From: So Cal
W213 '17 E43 ///AMG - W211, W208 no more
I think in conclusion, keep the rear of the 208 and have the front of the 209. That is what i would like too have.
then, I would have bought a w209 instead of the w208....
but, MB decided to design it after the C70/accord
