CLK500 vs. SC430
I can afford a:
2003- 2004 CLK 500
or
2002 SC430.
Just your thoughts are needed.

You can't i have a 230 "coupe"

I wanted to buy 1 about amonth ago but I decided to go with a different lender that won't let me buy from private parties or ebay : (
I'm leaning towards the SC430 only because i see few on the road and it's a hard top convertible.
the sc430 is a pretty hot car and hard top convertible which is great. i have a clk coupe, but i bet it must feel pretty good crusing down the highway with the top down..........cons.....the back is VERY tight.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The SC is definitely rarer...maybe it doesn't sell as well
- if you must'v hardtop, buy SC
- if you need for 4 seater and more room, get CLK
- CLK from outside, looks much more elegant (compared to a too much sporty toad-like exterior of SC)
- drive: SC runs very smooth 'n quiet. CLK you feel road bumps a lot (though its still smoother to BMW)
- SC has Mark Levinson audio, which beats the crap out of CLK's Bose/Harmon
- Brand: Mercedez has a opulence of its own (BMW as for fun-ride), Lexus crowd is kinda less-pretentious eco-centric new-age wall-street hipsters
Last edited by alexmn; Oct 1, 2007 at 08:33 PM.
ah i was in a very similar situation a few months ago, i totaled my bmw e46 325ci and had to choose between a e46 m3 or a clk500, i didn't want the same boring interior since the e46 m3 interior and my e46 325ci are almost exactly the same 99% i would say is the same .. so i went with the clk500, i can't say i regret the decision but... the m3 would have been more fun to drive, i guess what i'm trying to say is test both cars and DRIVE them both before you decide, looks aren't everything
good luck man


