CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) 2000 - 2010 (Two Generations)

2006 Clk500 = 2003 Clk55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-26-2005, 03:31 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
2006 Clk500 = 2003 Clk55

So I was looking at MBUSA.com today and what did I see, a picture of a 2006 CLK500.This damn thing looks exactly like my 2003 CLK55....Right down to the twin, chrome exhaust pipes on the left side. It even has the three ribbed grill and round fog lights of the 2005 CLK55. This sucks. I really can't wait until I get rid of this car. Why does Mercedes have to do this. Why can't they let AMG owners have some sort of unique design styling that lasts throughout the car's lifespan? Is that really too much to ask? I think its great that owners of the 2006 CLK500 get a great looking car......a 2003 CLK55!!
Just another thing to **** me off.
Old 07-26-2005, 03:52 PM
  #2  
Member
 
sicrx65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK430
that sucks. U should have kept the 208 hehe
Old 07-26-2005, 04:04 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
M1M2M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,121
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Mercedes
how could you go from 208 to 209 Do you really like the 209 better?
Old 07-26-2005, 05:03 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by M1M2M3
how could you go from 208 to 209 Do you really like the 209 better?
I loved my CLK430, but I also love my CLK55. Can't I love two cars at the same time?
I guess I really wanted an AMG and I wanted it new....not used. So back in 2003 I really had no choice but to go with the W209. I regret nothing. The car is great.
I just now love the CLS55 more. And the fact that the new CLK500 looks like my car pisses me off.
Old 07-26-2005, 06:57 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Kar don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: GMT -8 hours
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
well at least ull still be able to blow away the 500.
Old 07-26-2005, 07:43 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Who is Kar Don? Did AlBoston change his name?
Old 07-26-2005, 09:54 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
BiTurboBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: back in Jersey
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
360 Spider
Most CLK500 owners wish they had the CLK55 anyway but they could not afford/justify the $20,000 increase. I can't blame them, MB doesn't give you much for the extra 20 large like they do with the W211.

Trending Topics

Old 07-26-2005, 11:16 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
FIXEDupW209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A bucket on wheels
take the badges off and have it as a sleeper. I have always wanted to do this but it can get costly to make a top of theline model look like a lower model. In your case MB did it for free. I agree with you. And now you see it more. You can get the AMG package on the E class as well. Think of it this way...its just minor exterior mods. Your interior is different along with all the performance parts. Get the cls 55 though that thing is sooo sweeet
Old 07-27-2005, 07:35 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by ///CLKfiftyfive
MB doesn't give you much for the extra 20 large
I disagree. Let's see what the differences are:

1. Hand-built engine
2. Beefed up transmission
3. Beefed up brakes
4. Beefed up suspension

..not to mention all of the interior standard features that are optional or not available on the 320 or 430/500.

You would be in for a lot more than 20K if you went aftermarket for the listed items above....plus, you get a factory 4/50 warranty. Having a factory hot-rod seems almost a bargain.

Perhaps the luxury mid-size coupe market in general is waning. It was not long ago that Mercedes-Benz did not even offer a mid-size luxury coupe (after the E320 coupe disappeared in 1995; the CLK did not appear until model year 1998!). The only option during that time was to go larger...to the CL500 or CL600.

Prior to that the mid-size luxury coupe was also on hiatus in the U.S. when the W123 280CE and subsequent 300CD production ended....the 300CE did not arrive until MY 1988.

So....are we entering an brief era where the CLK will disappear for a few years?
Old 07-27-2005, 07:40 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by FIXEDupW209
Get the cls 55 though that thing is sooo sweeet
Damn....you are not helping. I really want one!!!!

I guess my point is....let the CLK500 have its own special sport design or something. Don't just copy the AMG exterior. I want to be special dammit!!!LOL
Old 07-28-2005, 09:25 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
55 ON IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W208 CLK55K, GTR, RS5
I feel your pain. It's so easy to fake an AMG. I wish they would take a page out of BMW's book and go with with some flared fenders just to make it more difficult to replicate.
Old 07-29-2005, 09:44 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Frisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03 CLK500, 04 X3, No 07 GT3RS :(
Originally Posted by ///CLKfiftyfive
Most CLK500 owners wish they had the CLK55 anyway but they could not afford/justify the $20,000 increase. I can't blame them, MB doesn't give you much for the extra 20 large like they do with the W211.
HAHAH - nice generalization. I saw the W209 AMG as a poorly spec'd and differentiated car and didn't understand why they even released it. I didn't buy it because it seemed like a poor use of $20k, not because I couldn't afford it.
Old 07-29-2005, 10:01 AM
  #13  
Member
 
termigni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
04 M3, 05 R1
just so you know, the body kits are slightly different from 03 to 06.
Old 07-29-2005, 12:11 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
AMG///Merc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oxford, Pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03 CLK55
Unhappy I have to agree with Frisco here...

Originally Posted by Frisco
HAHAH - nice generalization. I saw the W209 AMG as a poorly spec'd and differentiated car and didn't understand why they even released it. I didn't buy it because it seemed like a poor use of $20k, not because I couldn't afford it.

If I were to do it again (I wouldn't!), I would get the CLK500 and have someone like Brabus or Kleeman modify it. The differences just aren't enough to justify the costs in my opinion. If you look at the suspension between the two cars, you'll note that they look identical, the only difference being the numbers stamped on the shock body. Of course they are valved differently, but compared to a BMW ///M car, the differences are minor. BMW's ///M cars use completely different control arms, shocks/springs/bushings and have a wider track. I wish the AMG make over was more comprehensive like BMW's ///M...


Best regards,
Matt
Old 07-29-2005, 01:29 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
M1M2M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,121
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Mercedes
Originally Posted by AMG///Merc
If I were to do it again (I wouldn't!), I would get the CLK500 and have someone like Brabus or Kleeman modify it. The differences just aren't enough to justify the costs in my opinion. If you look at the suspension between the two cars, you'll note that they look identical, the only difference being the numbers stamped on the shock body. Of course they are valved differently, but compared to a BMW ///M car, the differences are minor. BMW's ///M cars use completely different control arms, shocks/springs/bushings and have a wider track. I wish the AMG make over was more comprehensive like BMW's ///M...


Best regards,
Matt
IMO the reason that AMG cars are as different from the base model as BMW is that there is an AMG for every model even G wagon! If they were to make them drastically different from the regular car it would cost way too much throughout the entire product line.
Old 07-29-2005, 02:42 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
55 ON IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W208 CLK55K, GTR, RS5
In no way am I putting down Mercedes, but I would find it very hard to drive a standard Mercedes. (Meaning a non AMG) Just knowing the fact that it's not the best will always bother me. Call me shallow if you want, but you get a certain sense of pride owning one. Having a Mercedes is one thing, but having an AMG is another.

If I had to choose an SL65 or a SL600 it would be a no brainer to get the SL65. But woud I take a SL600 over a SLK55? In a ****ing second!

AMG model > standard model

Last edited by 55 ON IT; 07-29-2005 at 02:46 PM.
Old 07-31-2005, 03:32 AM
  #17  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
BlackC230Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 12,403
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Fast Cars!
Why dont they make an 06 CLK55 coupe? only a convertible? also did anyone notice they finally stuck 255 rear tires on the CLK55 cabrio?
Old 08-21-2005, 04:56 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
BigHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 257
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'13 SL550
I regret selling my 208

What was I thinking !!! The car was cherry.

Got hooked on the M3 and made the jump. I love the Bimmer but won't mind getting a vert CLK 55. Problem is a hate the 209 body.

I too hope for great things in the next model. When can we expect it?
Old 08-21-2005, 04:59 PM
  #19  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
255mm wide? What's it?
Man I have 255!
Old 08-27-2005, 02:20 PM
  #20  
Member
 
skytop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 176
Received 42 Likes on 30 Posts
Just purchased a new 2005 CLK55 and traded in my CLK500

Just bought a 2005 CLK55 coupe. Did not want or need a rag top down here in the land of the intense sun. For 2006, only rag top AMG CLK55's will be offered.
I traded in my 04' CLK500 for the AMG. What has been said about the exterior trim on the new 2006 CLK500 is true and is a bummer. MB has usurped the speciality of the AMG and downgraded it to the regular production vehicles.
However, I must state to the board that the difference inside and the mechanicals of the AMG are light years ahead of the CLK500. The power, the suspension, the far improved road feedback, the mighty brakes and the fabulous sport seats and paddle shifter bring a broad smile to my face every time I drive. And did I mention the awesome sounds the AMG makes? WOW!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2006 Clk500 = 2003 Clk55



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.