new clk63 confirmed by edmunds
AFFALTERBACH, Germany — Of late, AMG has concentrated on artificially aspirated engines, namely supercharged V8s and turbocharged V12s. But that's all about to change when Mercedes-Benz's performance division unveils its new V8 at the Frankfurt Motor Show next month.
Dubbed the ML156, the new normally aspirated 6.3-liter V8 will make its Frankfurt debut in the Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG. The engine delivers 510 hp at 6,800 rpm and 465 pound-feet of torque at 5,200 rpm. AMG officials told Inside Line the large displacement allows 20-percent more torque than its chief competitors, while at the same time being lighter, more fuel-efficient and more drivable.
After it debuts in the ML63 AMG, the engine will go into the CLK63 AMG and E63 AMG, likely to be unveiled at next spring's Geneva show. In late 2006, the engine will make its way into the R63 AMG, and in early 2007, it will go into the C63 AMG and SLK63 AMG.
The ML156 engine won't be fitted into the AMG versions of the new S-Class — premiering at the Frankfurt show — the CL or SL until at least 2008. Those vehicles will feature more powerful versions of their current engines.
While this new engine is normally aspirated, AMG officials said the division will remain faithful to turbocharging where it makes sense.
What percentage of driving time do you actually use 500+ HP? Purchase price and ownership depreciation for these mega HP vehicles is the most severe example in the market.
At almost $4. a gallon, you also won't be so eager to induldge in Lead foot Lenny type driving.
man i remember a few years ago, brabus 6.1 in an slk was crazy, now, according to edmunds, 6.3 in an slk amg production model. amg turns over so fast, great for marketing, staying ahead with numbers, and sales, but screws over the customers of existing amg's lol!
I agree, putting one of these in a clk or slk is going to make for some incredible driving capabilities. I do think this is the upper limit of horsepower for both of these cars, and in fact may be too much ( there I said it). I'll gladly take a hugely depreciated slk 55 as soon as these come out though!
6.3L engine!!!!!..... why the hell they need a N/A this big but a supercharger or turbo charger is the more efficient way to do it with about the same output........
they proabbly end up putting a 6.3 quad turbo in the coming 2008 2009 SL
Last edited by mtimmy; Aug 31, 2005 at 06:20 PM.
Trending Topics




6.3L engine!!!!!..... why the hell they need a N/A this big but a supercharger or turbo charger is the more efficient way to do it with about the same output........
they proabbly end up putting a 6.3 quad turbo in the coming 2008 2009 SL
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
some things undesiarable with f/i: consistency (heat soak) and reliability. n/a minimizes these factors and provides better platform for driving the car at the track, faster throttle resopnse, greater predictability in mid-corner throttle modulation, etc.
Should get your hands off the CLK like E owners gets their hands off and go for a CLS.
As always, with more and more AMG's out there, the exclusivity attached to the name will be severly diluted. Man, there are little old ladies tooling down the road now in their big Benz' with 500 HP under their patent leather strapped pump right foot and they don't have a clue what to do with them!
I also dont belive it tho... untill i see it!!
gj AMG! They are on a right track with that decision!!!


