CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) 2000 - 2010 (Two Generations)

Take a deep breath and say "AAAAAAHHHH"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-12-2006, 12:18 AM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Take a deep breath and say "AAAAAAHHHH"

How to improve breathing, I have two to do, I'll be hard pressed to have them both done by Nov. Will have to try though! Need more power, must have!!!!!!

Bottom half, you can hardly see the details, flaps etc, because of the build up.


Top half seperated, After initial cleaning.




Bottom after initial cleaning.



All cleaning done, smoothing and polishing started.


Rich

Last edited by mbenzman; 10-12-2006 at 12:27 AM.
Old 10-12-2006, 01:58 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
DirtyVegasMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 689
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
'21 GLC63, '19 M5
Is this on your CLK 55 and will the performance gains be worth it?
Old 10-12-2006, 09:09 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rsr911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2003 AMG SL55, 2002 AMG CLK55, 2002 AMG ML55, 2005 ML350, 1995 S320 LWB - totaled
Thumbs up

WOW shocking!!! Was this car just puttered around town? How many miles are on it. What else are you planning to do to it.

I had my intakes on my 86 911 polished and flowed by Andial. It was expensive but the performance gains were quite noticeable and worth it.
Old 10-12-2006, 09:30 AM
  #4  
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 21,005
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Subscribing.
Old 10-12-2006, 12:40 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S600TT, R350
What you have done is to shorten your intake runners. It is worth about 15HP from 4500-6000 rpm. However, you will loose 15-25 ft.lbs. of TQ from 2000-4500 rpm. I did this on C43 about three years ago, if I have time I will look for the Dynojet graph in my archives.
The following users liked this post:
eurochargedw210 (09-20-2020)
Old 10-12-2006, 12:53 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
Is that the ML's or CLK's?
Old 10-12-2006, 03:44 PM
  #7  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Teaser.
Old 10-12-2006, 04:54 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rsr911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2003 AMG SL55, 2002 AMG CLK55, 2002 AMG ML55, 2005 ML350, 1995 S320 LWB - totaled
Thumbs up

Pretty - Shiney
Old 10-12-2006, 08:53 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NitrogenBalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
none
As my car is going in for the winter sleep you have read my mind!! A few questions though.

1. first and foremost, how much of a PIA is it to remove the intake manifold and associated parts? I have stared at mine for hours thinking hhmmm..

2. did you remove any material form the piece or just polish and clean it??

3. would you say the buildup was due to the oil breather lines being piped back into the TB and intake??

if #3 is true I'm glad I routed my lines to a breather/catch can....

All in all nice work!!!!
Old 10-13-2006, 02:47 PM
  #10  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Is this on your CLK 55 and will the performance gains be worth it?
No, it's the ML55's, but they will both get the treatment. That's the plan!

Is that the ML's or CLK's?
Both, but the ML's is now completely apart and some pieces are sent out.

WOW shocking!!! Was this car just puttered around town? How many miles are on it. What else are you planning to do to it.
Mrs Leadfoot would have you believe she can only "putter" around Atlanta (because she's running everyone over @ 85 mph). !12k Hard miles in an 5000 lb. SUV. She complains about the power in this ML55 all the time (it's no slouch and has impressed a few passengers), especially since I finished the intake on the 500E.

What you have done is to shorten your intake runners. It is worth about 15HP from 4500-6000 rpm. However, you will loose 15-25 ft.lbs. of TQ from 2000-4500 rpm. I did this on C43 about three years ago, if I have time I will look for the Dynojet graph in my archives.
I don't like compromises and was afraid of losing bottom end on the 500E, I believe I picked up torque and power across the board. It changed the sound too!
I do not plan on "shortening the runners, just cleaning, smoothing and concentrating on improving airflow and heat control. I should not decrease power levels anywhere.
I am impressed with these manifolds and don't see as much room for improvement as I did with the 500E. It's also very easy to work on since it all comes apart.

Rich

Last edited by mbenzman; 10-13-2006 at 02:59 PM.
Old 10-13-2006, 05:38 PM
  #11  
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,512
Received 150 Likes on 106 Posts
Looks as if we could all benefit from a bottle of very high quality fuel system cleaner every 15k or so...
Old 10-13-2006, 05:40 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S600TT, R350
I do not plan on "shortening the runners, just cleaning, smoothing and concentrating on improving airflow and heat control. I should not decrease power levels anywhere.
My mistake. Judging from the pictures, it looked like were going to leave out the middle section of the manifold.

It is a work of art and is made out of a magnesium alloy. Like you mentioned, except for cleaning, there is very little you can do to improve it.
Old 10-13-2006, 11:34 PM
  #13  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Originally Posted by RJC
Looks as if we could all benefit from a bottle of very high quality fuel system cleaner every 15k or so...
That wouldn't hurt, BUT won't do a thing to the intake because a additive in the fuel would only do any cleaning from the injectors down. They are located in the intake manifold ports just above the intake valves. To be effective you would need to introduce a cleaner such as bg air induction system cleaner to the air intake tract. With the resonance intake such as this you would need to manually open and close the resonance flaps to allow the cleaner to be effective on both air paths.
Rich
Old 10-17-2006, 11:26 PM
  #14  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
I got side tracked, LITERALLY by a side show crosslink to my post here! I guess I wasn't suppost to see an expert's opinion of my work. Maybe omeyhomey should have posted here to stop me from wasting my time.
If anyone would like some entertainment related to this post, follow this thread. http://www.benzworld.org/forums/show...=1#post2068009


Here's an update to the manifold. I'm finding some places to improve but remain impressed with this manifold. I've run into some roadblocks about dealing with magnesium. My metal coating shop failed to electropolish the surface so I have reverted back to manual polishing. I have to to get the project completed in time for the Atlanta AMG GTG. So here's today eye candy. ENJOY!
Rich


Last edited by mbenzman; 10-18-2006 at 01:54 AM.
Old 10-18-2006, 10:17 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NitrogenBalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
none
That looks great. How long would you say it took to diassemble the intake manifolds??

Also, whats going to keep it from building up all that gunk like before???
Old 10-19-2006, 12:06 AM
  #16  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Originally Posted by NitrogenBalance
That looks great. How long would you say it took to diassemble the intake manifolds??

Also, whats going to keep it from building up all that gunk like before???
Disassembly would take about an hour. removal about 3 hours to remove and reinstall. Cleaning this thing, with so many passages, about another 2.5 hrs.

Hopefully fully polished will provide increased resistance to stuff sticking on, but I will start regular intake flushing since this surprised me to have on my own vehicle.

Now that cleaning is done I will take it up a notch. https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...13#post1798913
Rich

Last edited by mbenzman; 10-19-2006 at 12:25 AM.
Old 10-19-2006, 05:59 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ghostrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KCMO, but Houston is my home.
Posts: 1,843
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
01 CLK 430
Originally Posted by mbenzman
Disassembly would take about an hour. removal about 3 hours to remove and reinstall. Cleaning this thing, with so many passages, about another 2.5 hrs.

Hopefully fully polished will provide increased resistance to stuff sticking on, but I will start regular intake flushing since this surprised me to have on my own vehicle.

Now that cleaning is done I will take it up a notch. https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...13#post1798913
Rich
Is there a way to clean the manifolds without taking them apart?

I was also thinking of having them extrude honed and coated, what are your thoughts on this?
Old 10-19-2006, 09:05 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NitrogenBalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
none
Rather than depending on the smooth surface to prevent buildup why don't you run an oil/air separator or catch can inline with the breather lines exiting the valve covers.

I think the configuration with the breather lines goin to the TB is for emmisons. I also have a feeling it is the reason the intake gets so dirty. If you get a catch can, instead of venting through a filter you can route the line right back to the TB to stay emmisions friendly. I would think this would catch all the oil and send a clean charge back to the TB preventing the gunk from ever happening again.

Alot of F/I cars run this setup pretty succesfully. I have this setup but I'm sure my intake is dirty from the original configuration of 55K miles.
Old 10-20-2006, 07:47 AM
  #19  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Originally Posted by Ghostrider
Is there a way to clean the manifolds without taking them apart?

I was also thinking of having them extrude honed and coated, what are your thoughts on this?
That's why I used the BG air induction cleaning kit. I actuated the resonance flaps and varied throttle application while running the flush, but I have my doubts as to how effective it can be with so much volume and all the nooks acd crannies.
It does seem seems happy and peppy since doing it, really eager to rev. But with damp roads for three days, I haven't measure any stronger, quicker runs.
Rich
Old 10-20-2006, 08:02 AM
  #20  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Originally Posted by NitrogenBalance
Rather than depending on the smooth surface to prevent buildup why don't you run an oil/air separator or catch can inline with the breather lines exiting the valve covers.

I think the configuration with the breather lines goin to the TB is for emmisons. I also have a feeling it is the reason the intake gets so dirty. If you get a catch can, instead of venting through a filter you can route the line right back to the TB to stay emmisions friendly. I would think this would catch all the oil and send a clean charge back to the TB preventing the gunk from ever happening again.

Alot of F/I cars run this setup pretty succesfully. I have this setup but I'm sure my intake is dirty from the original configuration of 55K miles.
I've been thinking about what you've said. Do you have any pictures of what you have installed and where did you buy the parts for it? You do realize that there already are sepertors built in?
The real problem is the minute you attach the pcv to engine vacuum, you get the vapors, which eventually does this, A seperator cuts it down by removing any liquid, but you still will get it unless you use a pump and vent to atmosphere. Then it's a emmission problem.
Here's a couple ideas to build on. relocate the pcv vacuum directly at the intake ports in the head or a wet nitrous kit. Carburated cars did not have this problem, despite having their pcv systems piped back into manifold vacuum. The gasoline from the jets back kept everything rinsed clean. If the ports were behind the injectors it would rinse the oil off, or the notrous would do the same. Honey it's a high performance cleaning kit for the engine, thats fun to use!
Maybe a good excuse for a wet nitrous oxide kit plumbed right behind the throttle body. I HAVE to go clean the manifold, honey! HAHA.
My sons 3rd birthday is Nov. 7th. I have him telling his mother he wants nitrous for his birthday! LOL
Rich

Last edited by mbenzman; 10-20-2006 at 08:13 AM.
Old 10-20-2006, 10:38 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NitrogenBalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
none
Funny that I have the same problem convincing my girlfriend to leave me alone and stop whining about what I'm doing with my car. I always try to drop a "for better safety" line in what I'm doing and she has no idea but "safety" usually makes her quiet down as if shes in danger. Funny really.

About the catch can, I bought one from Jegs for $55. It has two 3/8 hose barbs, a mini filter on top, and an open/close valve on the bottom for draining. I'll grab some pics this weekend. My setup would not be emmisions friendly but I'm not worried about that out here. The mini filter could simply be replaced with 3/8 tube running back to the intake.

I'm planing on running a methanol/H20 mist sometime soon. I have heard that when used in the location you mentioned(TB mount of intake) it can have a steam cleaning effect on the intake manifold similar to what you are thinking of with nitrous. I still think that after seeing yours that mine would need a good initial cleaning before attempting to keep it clean as I am. Pics on there way.
Old 10-20-2006, 11:41 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rsr911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2003 AMG SL55, 2002 AMG CLK55, 2002 AMG ML55, 2005 ML350, 1995 S320 LWB - totaled
That safty line is worth its wait in gold. Or in my case a set of Wilwood big brakes for my WRX track car. I even had my friends wife backing me up. He has a track car too. My wife went with it. What a great lady!!

Will be using it again in the future I am sure.
Old 10-21-2006, 09:29 AM
  #23  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Since there seems to be a little confusion about my intents over at benzworld, I took this manifold off to madify it, not just clean it.
I seperated the posts because I thought this was the case.
So here's a upper half picture before cleaning, since the other cleaned up pictures seems to make people think the top doesn't get much buildup.
Rich

Old 10-21-2006, 04:36 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
This gentleman added velocity stacks to his m113 intake mani!

http://www.club202.com/forums/showth...&threadid=8726

Rich I also have an extra intake mani,would you be able to perform some magic on it for me? One more question,would'nt you have been able to have gotten your intake mani extrude honed?


PS That 500E is a loely machine.Sounds and looks damn good in that video.Let us know your dyno and 1/4 mile times when able. Unfortunately I have to call Chappy and tell him i won't be making it down to ATL!

Last edited by ProjectC55; 10-21-2006 at 05:15 PM.
Old 10-24-2006, 08:56 AM
  #25  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
mbenzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga.
Posts: 784
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of them!
Originally Posted by coolcarlskiC43
This gentleman added velocity stacks to his m113 intake mani!

http://www.club202.com/forums/showth...&threadid=8726

Unfortunately I have to call Chappy and tell him i won't be making it down to ATL!
I absolutely do not believe those velocity stacks are an improvement over the factory setup. The intake will peak at one rpm now, ONLY. He never posted a dyno sheet or even claimed to dyno it. The other thing I would not do is to glue them on. He did this with epoxy, and I would fear them coming loose due to the vibration from the resonance. Of course they won't have to endure as much resonance since the manifold will only peak once.
There is theory, then there is practice. His velocity stacks have potential to make top end power. Some theory isn't correct. I'm not knocking his redesign except for the glue part, just would like to see results to go with it.
Just my 2 cents.
Rich


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Take a deep breath and say "AAAAAAHHHH"



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.