E39 M5 vs. W208 Clk55
the M5 is supposed to have about 400hp and 360tq, but weighs like 600 pounds more than the Clk.
kill stories would be nice
If I had to pick, though, I'd say the ///M

It would be a driver's race. As Owen mentioned the E39 apparently had a tendency to bog off the line, so unless the owner is willing to sacrifice their clutch, a W208/55 would have a strong chance of winning as long as you could hook up.
Trending Topics

They're supposed to be pretty fast cars. Would be a great race.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG 5.0 13.6
2001 BMW M5 4.7 13.2
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
That having been said. YES they are a very fast car. Get one wound up and get it on a fun twisty road, (which is what these cars were built for not drag racing) The M5 is a pleasure to drive. As are our W208 CLK55s.
For a stock W208/55, the best ET I recall was around 13.2X or 13.1X. Check dragtimes.com for more info on that.
As far as "average", I don't know. The other W208 CLK55 tested last fall in Atlanta (same day/same dyno) tested within a couple hp of me. One thing is for sure....W208 CLK55s are under-rated by at least 20 crank hp, according to the pro drag folks I've talked to (based on 1/4 results using weight, ET and trap speed).
For a stock W208/55, the best ET I recall was around 13.2X or 13.1X. Check dragtimes.com for more info on that.
As far as "average", I don't know. The other W208 CLK55 tested last fall in Atlanta (same day/same dyno) tested within a couple hp of me. One thing is for sure....W208 CLK55s are under-rated by at least 20 crank hp, according to the pro drag folks I've talked to (based on 1/4 results using weight, ET and trap speed).
My business partner just bought an e39 got it yesterday so we will have plenty of vids only problem is ill be supercharged next time i get the 55 out lol











not necessarily!
...wow
