Clk63be Vs 997gt3???
Are you talking CLK63 black series? The regular CLK63 is no were close to 136k.
*EDIT*
I didn't see the title CLK63 BE. I am guessing BE stands for Black edition.
I considered a GT3, and as a practical concern, a GT3 isn't a daily driver. To get the performance and the figures are impressive, you've got to rev the hell out of it. Not a plus in LA freeway traffic. On the positive side, fantastic grip and a out of the box race car with only some suspension adjustment.
It's a 7:43 car with R tires around the Nurburgring. The CLK 63BS has been clocked at 7:45, which isn't slow and shows a lot of engineering when into this car. In a straight line the CLK 63 would seem to have the advantange. I like the fact that I can get two golf bags in the CLK. I will go out on a limb and predict that CLK would be easier to drive high the average guy. For the track junkie its a GT3, for an older track junkie who've had high reving mounts, it's CLK 63BS hands down.
BTW, did anyone notice the CLK63 BS has additional trans, p/s and engine coolers.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
for a race car but thats not real world. I don't know if you've lived with a track car on the street, I've got one and its good for an hour on the street or track days. AMG hit the nail on the head building a useable car that can do both.
for a race car but thats not real world. I don't know if you've lived with a track car on the street, I've got one and its good for an hour on the street or track days. AMG hit the nail on the head building a useable car that can do both.
) how much it weighs and he said 4200lbs, i was like
if they made the car 3500-3600lbs it would have been perfect. same problem w/ the slr. companies need to realize that adding hp wont solve ****, all they are doing is making it necessary for everything to be bigger and adding more weight. instead of adding more power they need to look at ways to get rid of the weight. i know 3xxxlbs doesnt sound as nice as 500hp when it comes to marketing though
heavier cars also use more brakes, tires etc... ive been driving my 997S harder than ive ever driven my clk and got more mi out of the rears (by about 3k mi) same tire on both. GT3>any mb (inc. slr), im a little biased, i like real sports cars
and im 24
for a race car but thats not real world. I don't know if you've lived with a track car on the street, I've got one and its good for an hour on the street or track days. AMG hit the nail on the head building a useable car that can do both.More importantly... how about some pics of the 993tt 3.8?
I had a 964 3.6t with the ANDIAL "s" conversion and boy do I miss it.
wrong, I love the gt3's but i have 35 minutes of video of my E55 crushing them at the track, it all comes down to drivers and i think you could put lewis hamilton in a gt3 then a 63 bs and it would be about the same in lap times. We need the stig!!lolol
"top speed"
Check out Rennlist under 993 trubo, Andial 3.8 registry. My avatar is a fair pic, screen name in JJayB. Since this is a MB board I respect that.
I would love to see your E55 "crush" my GT3 at the race track. Unless you are a top pro driver, you would be hard pressed to pass a well-driven GT3, especially on R-tires.
I own both, and in my opinion the E55 may be the worst handling car I've ever owned.
I would love to see your E55 "crush" my GT3 at the race track. Unless you are a top pro driver, you would be hard pressed to pass a well-driven GT3, especially on R-tires.
I own both, and in my opinion the E55 may be the worst handling car I've ever owned.
carbon and lights its 133k.
Oh,..and I'll drive to the country club cause you can't get two golf bags in the GT3.
carbon and lights its 133k.
Oh,..and I'll drive to the country club cause you can't get two golf bags in the GT3.
Personally, I would like to hear from someone who has driven both the 997 GT3 and the CLK63be and who can compare the two cars in real-world driving situations, not at the track. Unless you are a real track junkie, most of the time any of us will spend in our cars will be on regular roads, etc.
Having previously owned a 996 GT3, I can tell you the ride was harsh on the street, and that's putting it nicely. I have heard that the 997 version is much more tractable on regular pavement and in that way a tremendous improvement from a daily driver standpoint. I have also read that the CLK63be is harsh and noisy, but I am sure that's by MB standards, so you can't really compare unless you've driven both.
Given the fact that I am trying to decide on a 997 GT2 or a CLK63be, such knowledge would be helpful.
Personally, I would like to hear from someone who has driven both the 997 GT3 and the CLK63be and who can compare the two cars in real-world driving situations, not at the track. Unless you are a real track junkie, most of the time any of us will spend in our cars will be on regular roads, etc.
Given the fact that I am trying to decide on a 997 GT2 or a CLK63be, such knowledge would be helpful.
If I were inclined to have the desire to track a car, I would go 'gung ho' and build a car specifically for the track.That being said..... comparing a BE to a GT2 is not fair.
I had a 2003 GT2. It was brutally fast and I really miss it. BUT..... I traded it on my 2004 Carrera GT which I think most of you would say was a good move.
The BE is supposed to sticker around $135,000 or so. My 2003 GT2 had a base window sticker of $182,000. With its huge list of options, the total was $205,700. Besides the enormous price difference...... I personally think the 2008 GT2 would absolutely smoke the BE!
Even still.... I'm excited about getting my hands on my White CLK63BE which should arrive late August or early September.
If you're into ferocious & outrageous speed,
you gotta go with the GT2. I'm just a little disappointed that the GT2 doesn't look at least as crazy or more vicious than the GT3RS. Being the 'Flagship Car' (of the 911s), it should look like it's from Outer Space!
Mags
A set of four going around 1000-1300 not sure that would be a smart move.
The CLK will make a great DD for those that are hardcore and track other cars on a regular basis.
I can't believe this is being discussed. I've never driven a CLK63 BE, but there's no way in any driving situation (roads, snow, mountain top, track) it'll beat a Porsche GT3. And Porsche's are very drivable for everyday. It's got more horsepower, but that's all; Porsche has everything else.
An E55 beat a Porsche on a track??, LOL - that's laughable; and it's "Top Gear" not "Top Speed".
Mags, you brought the CLK63 B.E.?? Wow, congrats another to stable; I didn't even see that you swapped your SL550 -- I'll try searching for the photos later. Did you get to test drive the CLK63, how was it?
Tee_Tz.


