Road & Track Gives New 08 M3 Same Specs as OUR BLACK SERIES
Those early #'s don't mean squat, nor should you care. Wait till the new M3 laps the 'Ring then we can talk... There are plenty of faster cars on the road, but none carry the exclusivity of the BS and very few are factory built with such attention to detail and carry a full factory warranty. Sure, some meet those last 2 criteria, but they are much more expensive than the Black Series...F430 for example.
On a given day in LA, I see lots of exotics, too many to mention...Porsches are more common than SUV's, Fcars are a dime a dozen, etc...I have only seen one other Black Series...And guess what, that makes me feel good about my purchase - and so should you.
Korn - I can put together a day at Streets...But I'd really like to run the Big track.
If it is a decision about the biggest bang for the buck, then a ZO6 or the new Nissan GTR is a better choice in theory. But then, an Evo 8 with a few mods will beat that.
If what you wanted was a true driver's car with more performance than you can ever use, great looks, reasonable comfort, and high quality, you made the right choice. If you are concerned ablut the M3, see which one the valet parks out in front of the restaurant the next time you take your wife to dinner. AS

When it was new... they put a big $ adjusted number on the car and held the line...

Today... they have a 30-Yr old car with about 50 miles on it... that in adjusted dollars maybe worth less then List when new.
Take the CLK63 BS anywhere that car people are at... park it and walk a short distance away... then watch the camera phones pop out... as it becomes a fashion model for the car culture clan...
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The CLK 63 BS drives like a regular benz in those grid lock times.
Jimmy
I'm in for Big Willow track day. Not to steal your thunder, Cort did a 1:27.7 with me riding in the passenger seat of my porsche! Said he couldn't put down the power and needed slicks.
In spite of the race car performance of the porsche, the Black is much easier to drive. I'm confident that its a low 1:30's with club drivers.
Jimmu



Last edited by PC Valkyrie; Dec 31, 2007 at 10:36 PM.
http://www.caranddriver.com/shortroa...cabriolet.html
The Black series was designed for all out race car and can barely beat a stock M3. What happen when BMW come out with the "CSL" edition. The last M3 "CSL" edition beat the stock M3 by more then 2 sec. on the same track.
http://www.caranddriver.com/shortroa...cabriolet.html
.........I know this is blasphemy for some, but does anyone have published lap times between the CLK63 BS and CLK63 fixed roof. I know this info will have to come from our european members since we don't have the later here. Is no one curious?
Ted
http://209.85.207.104/search?q=cache...lnk&cd=1&gl=us
Ted
By comparing head to head as magazines do,it assumes that the durability is the same, its not. I doubt BMW warrants their car for track use. In fact they tried to weasel out of warrantee claims on the last M3 motor when it became apparent it was clearly a manufacturing defect in the con rods. AMG has publicly stated that the black is covered for track events like the AMG trophy, and AMG Challenge.
At the end of the day only AMG and porsche stand behind their products when used a as advertised.
Jimmy
By comparing head to head as magazines do,it assumes that the durability is the same, its not. I doubt BMW warrants their car for track use. In fact they tried to weasel out of warrantee claims on the last M3 motor when it became apparent it was clearly a manufacturing defect in the con rods. AMG has publicly stated that the black is covered for track events like the AMG trophy, and AMG Challenge.
At the end of the day only AMG and porsche stand behind their products when used a as advertised.
Jimmy
There was a huge uproar over carbon ceramic brake failure that wasn't covered, costing $10,000 to replace, and causing many to strip off the ceramics and switch to steel Brembo's. Transmission repairs have also been denied (though one can see how that could be misuse-related). Right now, I would say anybody with a Porsche who wants their warranty to be maintained with certainty has to avoid tracking, or at least effectively conceal that use. One single type 2 over rev (the kind when the engine is forced over redline thru downshifting) will void the warranty entirely. This is a huge change from the 90's when track use was encouraged, and all Porsche wanted was a pre-event "inspection" which cost about $50. AS
The standard CLK63 AMG coupe had a laptime of 1.18,4 minutes with street tires. As such, it is hard to really compare to the CLK63 AMG Black Series time of 1.13,8 minutes which was done with R-compound tires.
I personally was interested in performance of the CLK63 AMG coupe because it had essentially the same chassis as my C55 AMG, but it has over 100HP more than my car. Despite having over 100HP more than the C55, it was only 0.2 seconds faster than the C55 AMG (both on street tires) around the short twisty Hockenheim track, making me suspect that the much heavier 6.2L V8 in the front may have had a negative impact on the handling (5.4L V8 weighs 172kg, vs 199kg for the 6.2L V8).
Of course, we all know the CLK63 AMG Black Series is nothing like the standard CLK63 AMG coupe, so its handling should be much better, although it seems it is not that much better than the E92 M3.
The standard CLK63 AMG coupe had a laptime of 1.18,4 minutes with street tires. As such, it is hard to really compare to the CLK63 AMG Black Series time of 1.13,8 minutes which was done with R-compound tires.
I personally was interested in performance of the CLK63 AMG coupe because it had essentially the same chassis as my C55 AMG, but it has over 100HP more than my car. Despite having over 100HP more than the C55, it was only 0.2 seconds faster than the C55 AMG (both on street tires) around the short twisty Hockenheim track, making me suspect that the much heavier 6.2L V8 in the front may have had a negative impact on the handling (5.4L V8 weighs 172kg, vs 199kg for the 6.2L V8).
Of course, we all know the CLK63 AMG Black Series is nothing like the standard CLK63 AMG coupe, so its handling should be much better, although it seems it is not that much better than the E92 M3.
........another car of note on the list is the Lexus LFA which lapped the ring at 7.24. This earth shatttering. It makes the Nissan GTR look slow. I don't know what is happening, but it looks like the Japanese mean business. The LFA is faster than all direct out of factory everything from Germany and is estimated to cost a moddest $170K in comparison. That is less expensive than SL65 which if the numbers are true, will be like turtoise chasing a Cheatah when the two are compared.
Ted
Last edited by Ted Baldwin; Jan 1, 2008 at 01:48 PM.


Who's going for a 2008 New Years drive in their CLK63 BS today...?
There was a huge uproar over carbon ceramic brake failure that wasn't covered, costing $10,000 to replace, and causing many to strip off the ceramics and switch to steel Brembo's. Transmission repairs have also been denied (though one can see how that could be misuse-related). Right now, I would say anybody with a Porsche who wants their warranty to be maintained with certainty has to avoid tracking, or at least effectively conceal that use. One single type 2 over rev (the kind when the engine is forced over redline thru downshifting) will void the warranty entirely. This is a huge change from the 90's when track use was encouraged, and all Porsche wanted was a pre-event "inspection" which cost about $50. AS
Thanks for bringing that up. I know some of the porsche warrantee claims are based upon the ecu numbers on average speed and over revs. It looks like only AMG stands behind their product for track use.
1) I guess you right !! I should said, it was designed based on "WANNABE" race car with stripped "everything". With that kind of hp and tq more then the M3, it should have beat the M3 by at least 4 sec. The CSL M3 only got about 30 hp more then the stardand M3 and beat it by more then 2 sec. at the same track.
2) Those events are a JOKE if you called it racing. It nothing more then a tracks set-up just to test drive the cars !!
Check out the laps times listed........
7:22.9 - 169.07 km/h -- Loaded BMW M3 CSL (tuned to GTR specs) ~600 PS
7:45* -- 159.48 km/h -- Mercedes CLK 63 AMG Black Series, 507 PS/1760 kg
Last edited by Clk&Slk; Jan 1, 2008 at 03:37 PM.




