Renntech Releases Specs on AMG GT S R1 Package

Subscribe
Jan 25, 2016 | 02:11 PM
  #1  


The new Renntech-tuned AMG GT S makes 611 horsepower and 620 lb-ft of torque. In other words, it's biblically fast.

Read the rest on the MBWorld homepage. >>
Reply 0
Jan 25, 2016 | 03:39 PM
  #2  
why don't they post real world gains in terms of speed? none of the tunes do.
Reply 0
Jan 25, 2016 | 05:42 PM
  #3  
Quote: why don't they post real world gains in terms of speed? none of the tunes do.
The issue is this: on the newer biturbo cars with the 722.9 trans, you can run right around 10.8 (give a tenth or two, here or there) with a tune and downpipes. With billet wheels- or even bigger turbos, beefed up clutches, heat exchangers, intercooler upgrades, etc., the transmission steps in and you run ... wait for it ... right around 10.8 (give a tenth or two, here or there). One shop even posted a hugely expensive turbo upgrade PKG that was, by their own calculations, only good for about a tenth in the 1/4.

Based on the few GT S we've done here, I'd say it's a good bet the car will run around 10.8. Give or take.

Reply 0
Jan 25, 2016 | 06:21 PM
  #4  
The GTS has the newer DCT and not the 722.9 MCT. Does this make a difference?

Quote: The issue is this: on the newer biturbo cars with the 722.9 trans, you can run right around 10.8 (give a tenth or two, here or there) with a tune and downpipes. With billet wheels- or even bigger turbos, beefed up clutches, heat exchangers, intercooler upgrades, etc., the transmission steps in and you run ... wait for it ... right around 10.8 (give a tenth or two, here or there). One shop even posted a hugely expensive turbo upgrade PKG that was, by their own calculations, only good for about a tenth in the 1/4.

Based on the few GT S we've done here, I'd say it's a good bet the car will run around 10.8. Give or take.

Reply 0
Jan 25, 2016 | 06:26 PM
  #5  
Quote: The GTS has the newer DCT and not the 722.9 MCT. Does this make a difference?
It would probably be worse than the "standard" 722.9, honestly. Look at the Porsche Turbos since 997.1- the DCTs can't hold anywhere near the power of their predecessors (though, in that case, there is more to it). We're dealing with similar issues on the Huracán and, soon, I imagine we'll be dealing with DCTs in the R8 as we start to get into tuning the updated version of those.

Still, though, that doesn't take away anything from the GTS. It's really so much more than just a 1/4 mile platform, you know? Besides, how jaded are we that 10.8 is somehow considered slow?
Reply 0
Jan 25, 2016 | 06:30 PM
  #6  
Good to know. I currently have a 15 E63S with heat exchanger, downpipes and a tune. Are you suggesting that I won't gain much with a turbo upgrade because of the 722.9 tranny?

Quote: It would probably be worse than the "standard" 722.9, honestly. Look at the Porsche Turbos since 997.1- the DCTs can't hold anywhere near the power of their predecessors (though, in that case, there is more to it). We're dealing with similar issues on the Huracán and, soon, I imagine we'll be dealing with DCTs in the R8 as we start to get into tuning the updated version of those.

Still, though, that doesn't take away anything from the GTS. It's really so much more than just a 1/4 mile platform, you know? Besides, how jaded are we that 10.8 is somehow considered slow?
Reply 0
Jan 25, 2016 | 06:53 PM
  #7  
Quote: Good to know. I currently have a 15 E63S with heat exchanger, downpipes and a tune. Are you suggesting that I won't gain much with a turbo upgrade because of the 722.9 tranny?
At this point, the 722.9 is the limiting factor. That's why ... hang on, I don't want to name any competitors' names, so let's just say "Beta Performance" for this example. That's why the "Compensator 7" PKG is being advertised at 10.8 seconds and the "Compensator 9" PKG, which adds a substantial amount of money to the build, is being advertised at 10.7 sec.

We've done a few turbo upgrades for mile guys and guys that want the power and top speed. In general, though, we've been advising our customers to hold off for a few more months until there is a real TCU solution.
Reply 0
Jan 25, 2016 | 08:57 PM
  #8  
Well still a 0.7 to 1 second gain in the 1/4 mile from just an ECU flash is pretty impressive. Do the pipes really need to be swapped to?
Reply 0

MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

Explore
story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Jan 26, 2016 | 10:12 AM
  #9  
Quote: Well still a 0.7 to 1 second gain in the 1/4 mile from just an ECU flash is pretty impressive. Do the pipes really need to be swapped to?
I find that my tune is enough unless you want more sound. The wheelspin is very heavy even with the most discerning of throttle input. I can not imagine the spin one would have with DP's and a tune (larger tq gains). I gained 110 hp and 134 tq in the sweet spot rpm ranges with just a tune (we dynod my car before and after). I would say my car might be a high 10 second car on a great day with a great launch with great DA but I doubt a full second gain in the quarter.
Reply 0
Jan 26, 2016 | 10:21 AM
  #10  
I was considering this package for my incoming GTS until I found out how much work it is to replace the downpipes. Most of the paneling underneath has to come out, then you drop the transmission, remove the torque tube and driveshaft, before you get access to the pipes. YIKES...
Reply 0
Jan 26, 2016 | 10:26 AM
  #11  
Hey Vic thanks for the input. Have you tried different tunes with weistec? I wonder if it might be better to smooth that low rpm torque bump to keep the thing hooked. Does it fall off too much near redline? You know, lose that sporty feel and feel like a truck motor? Any issues at all with driveability? Fuel economy?

Or should I get the tune as soon as I can?
Reply 0
Jan 26, 2016 | 10:26 AM
  #12  
Quote: I was considering this package for my incoming GTS until I found out how much work it is to replace the downpipes. Most of the paneling underneath has to come out, then you drop the transmission, remove the torque tube and driveshaft, before you get access to the pipes. YIKES...
It's a lot of labor, but it's pretty straightforward. Besides the cost, the primary aggravation of the downpipes (if you have it registered in IL, anyway) is emissions.
Reply 0
Jan 26, 2016 | 10:27 AM
  #13  
Quote: Well still a 0.7 to 1 second gain in the 1/4 mile from just an ECU flash is pretty impressive.
100%.
Reply 0
Jan 26, 2016 | 11:32 AM
  #14  
Quote: Hey Vic thanks for the input. Have you tried different tunes with weistec? I wonder if it might be better to smooth that low rpm torque bump to keep the thing hooked. Does it fall off too much near redline? You know, lose that sporty feel and feel like a truck motor? Any issues at all with driveability? Fuel economy?

Or should I get the tune as soon as I can?
Ive probably tried 3-4 tunes, some with more tq and some with less at launch. I picked the middle option where I have to modulate the throttle a little bit to avoid wheelspin but the one where the car just pulls like a train during rolling runs. The change in acceleration from a roll is incredible with the tune giving so much more useful tq and hp in the usable rpm shift ranges.

I have had my car up to 16x mph at times (Mexican Toll Roads) and the hp and tq has not fallen off but then again I wasn't in the final gear long enough to have such an event. The car really feels amazing with the tune and I got mine early on (circa 200 miles or so I think). I think my fuel econ did go down because my foot got heavier with the added juice but I realize its a pay to play environment.
Reply 0
Jan 26, 2016 | 05:54 PM
  #15  
Quote: The issue is this: on the newer biturbo cars with the 722.9 trans, you can run right around 10.8 (give a tenth or two, here or there) with a tune and downpipes. With billet wheels- or even bigger turbos, beefed up clutches, heat exchangers, intercooler upgrades, etc., the transmission steps in and you run ... wait for it ... right around 10.8 (give a tenth or two, here or there). One shop even posted a hugely expensive turbo upgrade PKG that was, by their own calculations, only good for about a tenth in the 1/4.

Based on the few GT S we've done here, I'd say it's a good bet the car will run around 10.8. Give or take.

Could you expand a bit on exactly what the transmission is doing? Is it slipping at higher power levels? This behavior also occurs at say 60-130 sprints?
Reply 0
Jan 29, 2016 | 04:53 AM
  #16  
`


Vic

Did you just do the tune or did

you go with the W.1 package

which includes the Weistec

air filters


Thank-You
D.B.


`
Reply 0
Jan 29, 2016 | 12:05 PM
  #17  
Quote: `


Vic

Did you just do the tune or did

you go with the W.1 package

which includes the Weistec

air filters


Thank-You
D.B.


`


Tune only---
Reply 0
Subscribe
Currently Active Users (1)
 
story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE