H&R Springs anyone??
i'm planning on putting some H&R springs on my GT and I was wondering if anyone has fitted them and if so what are your thoughts?
I've searched the forum and also the internet with no opinions or reviews so any direction would help. My car is the GT without the adaptive suspension.
thanks
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
As you say the KW's do cost 3 times more than the H&R's but they have the added benefit of being adjustable. Don't know whether that alone would warrant the price difference. As I said earlier I want to retain the comfort whichever direction I go. In my eyes the car looks like it's on stilts at present so want to pull the trigger sooner rather than later. Just don't want to make a mistake and then have to backtrack.




The H&R's are a fixed height set up and most of the springs I had made my cars more bouncy in both slower bumps and higher speed bends/turns. Of course the only true way to see what spring is better is to try them both on but who is willing to do that LOL.
Disclaimer: my experiences only but tangible to my ownership and extensive sampling of both. And the cars' shocks play a large role. I do have one set of H&R's in my current lineup: Turbo S and they are actually great but I did a lot of research and asked a lot of questions with owners who had them plus I test drove a car first.




2012 CLS63
2012 E63
2012 Ferrari FF (Novitec)
2014 RS7
2014 Ferrari 458 (Novitec)
2015 Lamborghini (Novitec-yes the Novitec springs are private labeled KWs)
2016 M4
2016 M5
2017 C63S
All of these cars felt excellent after the drops (over 1.5 inches on all front and rear) and were very compliant over harsh bumps and planted at higher speeds (plus 100 mph). Now of course comfort does change but Im ok with that. The dampeners also play a key role as I mentioned above but these cars were or are great. The only one that sometimes made me wondering was the RS7 (a little too bouncy).
i'm curious how you are coming up with such a statement? Have you ever driven a KW HAS vs H&R AMG GT? There is a reason KW costs what it does. There is definitely some AMG tax on there but for something as important as suspension it is surely worth the money.
All that being said, I have no intentions of changing the suspension on the GT because I can barely get it into my building at it's current height, so I can't offer any opinion specifically related to the GT just past experience with 20-25 vehicles lowered with one or the other (and probably the occasional eibach kit back in the day lol). Of my current cars with modified suspensions one has KWs and the other two have H&Rs.
Last edited by boosting1bar; Feb 24, 2017 at 05:22 PM.





Again the compression and rebound rates (spring rates) actually made the car more endurable, for a lack of a better word, as well as my C63S. The C63S has a gut wrenching taut suspension and the dampeners are the culprit but once the KW's went on the car became more compliant and actually a better handler. The GTS probably didn't realize such a dramatic improvement as the C63S but the magnetorheological shocks probably are the difference.




. Imagine if all the wheels being sold today were made by one builder; there was a time when Ronal owned the wheel segment from a build aspect making 1 of every 3 oem wheels on certain German brands.
On the wheel side, the cores are really only coming from a few sources and the milling is done by each manufacturer so even there, there is very little difference between them.



