Diesel Forum Forum for Diesel engine vehicle related discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

OM642: Turbo Resonator (kidney) Removal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-07-2009, 01:09 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Rob CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 510
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E55 AMG | Buell Lightning XB12
OM642: Turbo Resonator (kidney) Removal

Here are a few shots of the "boost/turbo resonator" and how I've disabled it:


[NOTE: REMOVAL BASED UPON MERCEDES-POWERED GRAND CHEROKEE PLATFORM]

Unit removed from vehicle
-Quite easy, and a pain in the rear at the same time. The unit is secured by two small star-head bolts (I believe an 8-point 5/16 socket will suffice in their removal). After that, you need only to release the hose clamps. There's -just- enough room to squeeze this unit out under the bumper from the lower driver's side and you have this:


Casing screws and top cover removed
-There are 19 screws and fastening the top cover. Once removed, the lid pops right off. Inside, you can see the "muffler" tube.


Baffles in muffler tubing
-The baffles release charged air into the squared chambers. Altough I don't have a clear picture of it, the bottom of the tube wide open which allows the air to move in a circular fashion back into the main pipe section due to the low pressure vaccuum created.


Removing the muffler
-This is very easy and can be done by hand. Shown here I've used a screw driver to evenly pry the unit upward and outward.


Muffler tubing
-Shown here, the tube is made of two pieces, they fit together loosely so don't freak when they break apart. Note the latent oil, this amount is still present after installing the catch can.


Final Prep
-Here's the finished product, just shy of the case cover and screws.


[Not pictured: My ear-to-ear grin]

Boost lag has reduced DRASTICALLY. The Jeep is more prone to breaking traction from a no-stall launch and since the mod, can squeal 'em on a low-speed roll.

I don't have any data on MPG but have to surmise since the spool is much quicker, improved bottom-end torque will greatly enhance fuel economy. Boost pressure remains the same (about 22-24psi).

Turbo noise, changes. Its gets sharper on the bottom-end, and quickly fades into what my friends and I call "Supersonic" mode.

Its nearly impossible to describe the way this little three litre engine snaps your neck around.

Cheers!
Old 02-07-2009, 07:56 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
harkgar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2006 E320 CDi, 2008 3/4 Ton Suburban, 2007 "rice rickshaw" Accord 5 speed
Well done.

I removed the two resonators in my sold 1986 560 SEL too. They were simply chopped off in a muffler shop and two new stainless steel pipes welded on for a much straighter run. You can see the photo posted in the W126 section. The end result is a throatier sound on acceleration and may be a marginal improvement in performance.
Old 02-08-2009, 03:01 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
harkgar, that resonator is on the intake side between the turbo and engine.

The only major downside is now you just have a big expansion chamber. The mod should only be temporary, a straight pipe wouldn't be difficult to fabricate.
Old 02-08-2009, 10:06 AM
  #4  
Member
 
tuikku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C200cdi
.
It is like this, in 320cdi, straight six cyl.


Old 02-08-2009, 05:24 PM
  #5  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Rob CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 510
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E55 AMG | Buell Lightning XB12
It suffices to say a hardpipe would suit as well. Having firsthand experience of the mod and structure of the resonator housing I prefer the method above as the charge air will benefit only at a marginal level when considering a hard pipe instead.

For a truly benefitial upgrade I would recommend converting to hardpipe throughout.

The mod above has the advantage of retaining a stock appearance and best of all, stability.

The piping runs very close to the serpentine belt and pulleys.

Using the box as above allows you to re-use factory mounts, thus eliminating any chance of foul play.

I did give some thought to fitting a pipe inside the box but as I mentioned, the benefit would be minimal in comparison.
Old 02-08-2009, 10:09 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
harkgar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2006 E320 CDi, 2008 3/4 Ton Suburban, 2007 "rice rickshaw" Accord 5 speed
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
harkgar, that resonator is on the intake side between the turbo and engine.

The only major downside is now you just have a big expansion chamber. The mod should only be temporary, a straight pipe wouldn't be difficult to fabricate.
I think we are talking about different things here. The resonators I referred to are the two "extra" mufflers located under the two rear passenger seats (one on each side), not on the intake side.
Old 02-09-2009, 06:48 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
When I said "that" I was referring to the one being discussed in the topic.
Old 05-15-2009, 10:42 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
wookiee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 3.0L CRD
Any chance of getting the pictures re-posted?
Old 09-30-2016, 09:44 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
08R320CDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 R320 CDI
Is this in the intake side between turbo and intercooler? I've seen something like what is described and wondered what it was, but the pics don't work anymore. Anyone?
Old 10-03-2016, 01:17 PM
  #10  
Member
 
mersum1es's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 242
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
W211 320CDI -04, W210 270CDI -01
this one?

http://www.mbclub.co.uk/forums/engin...what-part.html

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 4.00 average.

Quick Reply: OM642: Turbo Resonator (kidney) Removal



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 PM.