Diesel Forum Forum for Diesel engine vehicle related discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

mixing ATF w/ diesel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-19-2010, 12:51 PM
  #51  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by KB3MMX
Nothing huh
Yes. Adding even 16oz to a 21 gallon tank is only a 168:1 ratio. Adding a "small" amount as you suggest (4oz average bottle size for 1Gal gas tanks) is a 672:1 ratio!

Such a minute amount will have no effect on the fuel system's lubricity and is physically impossible to produce a significant increase in fuel economy. 2-stroke oil doesn't increase BTUs over an identical volume of Diesel or contain anything that alters the Diesel's chemistry. Even if you consider the added volume of oil is unaccounted for in the fill volume of fuel, 16oz would change MPG from 25mpg to 25.15mpg, and if used consistently would not change the MPG number at all.

If adding 2-stroke oil were such a major advantage then every brand of station would be doing it and marketing the hell out of it to bring in more customers.

Last edited by 240D 3.0T; 12-19-2010 at 12:55 PM.
Old 12-19-2010, 12:58 PM
  #52  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Question

So you didn't bother to read the test in the link.

Last edited by KB3MMX; 12-19-2010 at 01:03 PM.
Old 12-19-2010, 01:07 PM
  #53  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
You mean the link to a magazine article that was conducted by enthusiasts under non-controlled conditions? Come back when you've got a link to a peer-reviewed article performed by experienced scientists that can find credible, reproducible, results.
Old 12-19-2010, 01:28 PM
  #54  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Cool

Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
You mean the link to a magazine article that was conducted by enthusiasts under non-controlled conditions? Come back when you've got a link to a peer-reviewed article performed by experienced scientists that can find credible, reproducible, results.
How about proving them, myself and so many others wrong when we have all seen a boost in our average MPG after using something so simple.
Also, do you want to take a stab at what the dilution rates are for most diesel lubricant, anti-gel or Cetane improvement additives? It doesn't take a large quantity...but wait, you say they do nothing.
Go talk to Stanadyne and tell them that, LMAO !!
Old 12-19-2010, 01:41 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by KB3MMX
How about proving them, myself and so many others wrong when we have all seen a boost in our average MPG after using something so simple.
How about you prove it works? For so many to claim it "works", I have yet to see a credible test conclude that it does actually work. I have better things to do with my time and money than put crap in my tank that wasn't designed to be used with diesel.

Also, do you want to take a stab at what the dilution rates are for most diesel lubricant, anti-gel or Cetane improvement additives?
The same, however, as noted before, they are designed with a specific planned outcome for diesel fuel. 2-stroke oil is designed to mix with gasoline to (in atomized form) lubricate the piston and bearings of weedeaters, chainsaws, blowers and scooters.

Try acting less like a sarcastic child and more like an educated adult.
Old 12-19-2010, 05:07 PM
  #56  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Cool

Haha, a funny guy, LMAO.
How about taking some midol and a nap

As you said, 2 stroke is a lubricant for gas 2 stroke engines that have no lube however putting it in diesel doesn't change that its a lubricant designed to be burnt!
I don't need more proof than seeing my MPG average has want up repeatedly after using it and the motor runs noticeably smoother.
I pay a lot more attention to mileage than most people but so what, who cares? It does give me the reason for continued use though when I see the results and the extra lube could extend the life of the wear items in the injection system. The articles and other peoples testimonials only back up what I have witnessed.

Nobody said YOU have to use it but discounting someone's experience when you have never tested it yourself seems pretty stupid, petty and immature.

How about testing yourself and then coming back in 6 months and tell everyone it doesn't work then....it'll never happen unless its a Lie.

Or option B, don't be a armchair quarterback about something you have ZERO experience with?

Last edited by KB3MMX; 12-19-2010 at 06:36 PM.
Old 12-19-2010, 06:56 PM
  #57  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
Right, you lack the necessary data for a proper debate.


Except that none of it makes a difference.


You obviously don't understand what this debate is about.


Oh, you mean like the part of the engine's cylinders that only see air?
Do you always act like this on here? IMO, You come off as a real spoiled teenage punk with your posts sometimes.

Anyway, you do understand that he(mi Benz) was correct that the plungers and barrels live in diesel, only the "underside" of the plungers are lubed by engine oil....add the injectors to a wear area that relies on lubricity of the fuel as well.

Last edited by KB3MMX; 12-19-2010 at 07:02 PM.
Old 01-03-2011, 10:47 AM
  #58  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by KB3MMX
Haha, a funny guy, LMAO.
How about taking some midol and a nap
Okay little boy. I'll leave you to play with the other children. If any adults would like to continue the discussion, please chime in.

As you said, 2 stroke is a lubricant for gas 2 stroke engines that have no lube however putting it in diesel doesn't change that its a lubricant designed to be burnt!
It also doesn't change the fact its not designed to mix with diesel and that it doesn't come in contact with anything when in atomized form.

I don't need more proof than seeing my MPG average has want up repeatedly after using it and the motor runs noticeably smoother.
Nobody is trying to convince you it works, in your imagination it already works, we are asking you to convince us.

I see the results and the extra lube could extend the life of the wear items in the injection system.
Actually you don't. Your duramax was designed to operate with ULSD, increasing lubricity will have zero effect on component life.

The articles and other peoples testimonials only back up what I have witnessed.
If you believe anecdotes then I have a cage fan here that thousands of people testify will work as a supercharge and add up to 50hp. I'll make you a deal and sell it to you for $200, $100 off the average price.

you have never tested it yourself seems pretty stupid, petty and immature.
Have you tested that jumping off a 10 story building hurts? I haven't but I believe others that it does. How about you go test that theory and I'll watch the news for your result.

How about testing yourself and then coming back in 6 months and tell everyone it doesn't work then
Let me repeat myself for the children (you) in this thread)...
"I have yet to see a credible test conclude that it does actually work. I have better things to do with my time and money than put crap in my tank that wasn't designed to be used with diesel."
Or option B, don't be a armchair quarterback about something you have ZERO experience with?
You need to take a look in the mirror little boy. Do you even own a Mercedes or do you just enjoy trolling forums and making yourself look ignorant?

You come off as a real spoiled teenage punk with your posts sometimes.
I'm sorry if education and real-world experience scares you.

the plungers and barrels live in diesel, only the "underside" of the plungers are lubed by engine oil
That is false information.

add the injectors to a wear area that relies on lubricity of the fuel as well.
Also false information. The only significant wear area of an injector is the nozzle seat where it sees frequent (contact) impact with metal.

If you wish to continue the discussion I suggest you open a book, preferable by a reputable source such as Bosch, and catch up with everyone else here.
Old 01-05-2011, 09:43 PM
  #59  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Ok, so you have proved nothing tough guy other than you must have limited knowledge of the workings of the injection system let alone hands on experience with a diesel.

So , again, how about stepping up to the plate like a big boy and doing some testing of your own instead of all the teenage outbursts of hot air?
When you have actually tried what you want to ridicule people for then by all means , voice your disgust but you currently have ZERO, NADA, ZILCH to offer anyone other than opinion due your lack of experience.

Run along now and get busy.
Old 01-09-2011, 10:20 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by KB3MMX
This message is hidden because KB3MMX is on your ignore list.
Please child, do not interrupt the discussion.
Old 01-09-2011, 10:45 AM
  #61  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
hit the road Tard, you have offered nothing except hot air.

Where's any of your data showing ANY proof of fact in your "argument", you don't have any, LMAO !!

Grow up.
Old 01-10-2011, 03:19 PM
  #62  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by KB3MMX
This message is hidden because KB3MMX is on your ignore list.
You keep interrupting us. Please go play with the other kids.
Old 01-10-2011, 04:41 PM
  #63  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Brilliant
Old 01-11-2011, 02:29 AM
  #64  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by KB3MMX
This message is hidden because KB3MMX is on your ignore list.
You keep trying but your words make no impact.
Old 01-11-2011, 11:36 AM
  #65  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
I see you still haven't come up with anything to support your weak argument.
Old 01-11-2011, 04:48 PM
  #66  
Junior Member
 
blowfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver, Republic of Canuckstan
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
81 300sd, 83 300dT, F350, 250 diesel & 16 ft car trailer
Dont worry this 240D dude is a pretty sick puppy, needs a lot of help.
u do have a lot of internal issues that the very reason u need to be self righteous, branding everybody a thief, liar.
I bet u cant look into a mirror to have a good look at yourself. U cannot be at peace with yourself and everybody else. I take u have more fingers in 1 hand than u have as friends.
God help u.
Old 01-11-2011, 04:58 PM
  #67  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Thanks... I think.

All 240D needs to do is provide something other than his heresay in the argument but he has no tests or data of any sort.
At least I have provided a link to a test with some data....where is his data from tests that says it doesn't work??......Crickets
Old 01-17-2011, 09:47 AM
  #68  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by blowfish
Dont worry this KB3MMX dude is a pretty sick puppy, needs a lot of help.
Thats pretty obvious.

God help u.
How will a story book character help me?
Old 01-17-2011, 10:25 AM
  #69  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
You sound like the next Arizona nutjob.

Have you had enough time to get anything to support your argument yet?
Old 01-17-2011, 12:53 PM
  #70  
Junior Member
 
Snakedr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fullerton California
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C55, 1969 Z/28, 2001 E320 (Totaled)
BP, Shell and Chevron all exceed the European spec. BP and Shell limit their product to a max of 450 microns with an typical test of 400.

All this info is easily accessed on you favorite fuel vendor web site.


Originally Posted by mi benz
Europe has had a lubrication spec (460 micron wear scar max) for well over a decade now. The US spec is not as demanding (520 micron wear scar allowed). Therefore the fuel found at US retail pumps is not required to meet the fuel spec most of our cars were designed to work with. This is why I use a lubricity additive.

I am fortunate to have quality biodiesel available and use anywhere from B2-B5 for lubricity. I would not use ATF in a fuel system.
Old 01-17-2011, 01:17 PM
  #71  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Originally Posted by Snakedr
BP, Shell and Chevron all exceed the European spec. BP and Shell limit their product to a max of 450 microns with an typical test of 400.

All this info is easily accessed on you favorite fuel vendor web site.
Thank you!! Someone that has some real data in their post!
Biodiesel addition is another excellent way to reduce that wear scar value from improved lubricity. I remember reading that a small percentage 2-5% volume added to conventional diesel had a fairly significant increase in lubricity.....and is meant to be burnt, unlike ATF.

http://www.biodiesel.org/pdf_files/f...Lubricity.PDF*


http://www.uiweb.uidaho.edu/bioenerg...cation/06.pdf*


.

Last edited by KB3MMX; 01-17-2011 at 01:31 PM.
Old 01-17-2011, 01:35 PM
  #72  
Junior Member
 
blowfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver, Republic of Canuckstan
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
81 300sd, 83 300dT, F350, 250 diesel & 16 ft car trailer
240D
a question, if you're so smart how come you not rich, people with your knowledge should be arriving in Maybach or we should say u being frugal driving 30 yrs old cars, commanding several grand to do a speech or write for the state of Union address.
so why would u argue here for nothing and get no respect, sink down to our low ground level?
Old 01-18-2011, 10:20 PM
  #73  
Member
 
mi benz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX, USA
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
98 E300
Originally Posted by Snakedr
BP, Shell and Chevron all exceed the European spec. BP and Shell limit their product to a max of 450 microns with an typical test of 400.

All this info is easily accessed on you favorite fuel vendor web site.
I've been to those fuel sites, and never saw any claims to < 450 micron, with the exception of BP Supreme. Please post a link if you ever come across one for Shell. Thanks.
Old 02-12-2011, 03:18 PM
  #74  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Post

Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
I have yet to see ANY correct information from you. Please come back when you've got something relevant and accurate to post.
I'm still waiting on any relevant info to back up your dogmatic commentary 240.



Here's more info on testing of fuel additives: http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=177728



Oh darn, look how the wear scar decreased with cheap 2 Stroke oil.




Old 02-12-2011, 03:20 PM
  #75  
Junior Member
 
KB3MMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.6 LBZ Dmax
Originally Posted by blowfish
240D
a question, if you're so smart how come you not rich, people with your knowledge should be arriving in Maybach or we should say u being frugal driving 30 yrs old cars, commanding several grand to do a speech or write for the state of Union address.
so why would u argue here for nothing and get no respect, sink down to our low ground level?
LMAO! !


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: mixing ATF w/ diesel



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 AM.