Oil Analysis Results

Report shows high oxidation, however the product information was incomplete, which I have since updated. According to their individual test info, oils with Esters normally show high oxidation, so this might be normal for the Mobil 1. I know that in the past they have blended esters and PAO's in their synthetics. If there are no esters in this product, then that means the oil is done.




The oil still looked pretty good, so it likely had a lot more life in it.
Now I've got Amsoil Euro Formula 5W40 Mid SAPS in there. So at the very least we'll have comparison data on the three oils up to 10,000kms, and potentially two of them up to 18,000kms.
Last edited by marc hanna; Jun 29, 2016 at 12:39 PM.
229.52 oils are 5w30 or 0w30
mine is a 09 blutec
I am looking forward to your amsoil results if you check it
thanks for your posts
Steve
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

The 5W40 isn't for the Bluetec's, even though it's not on the approved list, the 5W30 Low SAPS would be the correct choice for the Bluetec.
Mine is a CDI, so the 5W40 or the 5W30 would be fine. The 5W40, may not give as good fuel economy, however the Mid SPAS oils theoretically have better protection because they have more SAPS in them, and being a 40 weight will naturally produce a stringer film.
Anyway, the proof is in the pudding, so we'll see what the results come back with.




I have stamp in the book saying M1 but no specific, so I guess they put the same oil I found on older receipts.
My oil shows lot of iron regardless low mileage.
Than low molybdenum would indicate dino oil. WTF. Is it M1 that generate high iron, or was it bogus oil change?
In the mean time I discover that even the car was taken reguraly to dealer, the hard to see things were pretty badly neglected.
Air filter was filthy, so was bottom of the radiator, cigarette butts on lower pan, intercooler hose was kinked and showing cracks.
So I consider the stamped oil change pretty fishy and will probably change the oil after long weekend what will add another 1000 anyway.






I had very good experience with Shell Rotella in older diesels and just discover http://www.shell.com/motorist/oils-l...-c3-0w-30.html that meets 229.52.
If I find it easy, that is probably what I will use.
In the mean time, doing MM I check voltage regulator to have very short brushes.
The darn thing retails at $90, while some sites go 4-digits for whole alternator.
Those things get darn expensive even when I found VR for about $60.
Last edited by kajtek1; Jun 29, 2016 at 11:55 PM.




Different manufacturers do have completely different ideas what is good for your engine

I did have some oil classes in my younger years and molybdenum is known for Centuries to improve lubrication, yet not that often used.
Fact is that only topic like that can give us real life research as even I run/test 5 different oils in my Ford in the past, that was just one engine so high iron could be interpret in couple of ways.
As of now my search for Shell Helix come with European supplier only.
As much as I would like to use Shell, it will cost me 3x what Mobil ESP does, so I am on the fence with the idea.
Would love to see your Amsoil test before I make my mind, but you will not run 4000 km by this weekend?
Last edited by kajtek1; Jul 4, 2016 at 09:55 PM.

I think going forward I'm going to continue to use Oil Analyzers, primarily because I get my results back very quickly. Blackstone takes about a month.




I wish Blackstone would also post oil on previous tests for easier comparison.
I just switched the oil that suppose to be changed by dealer 5000 miles ago to M1 ESP 0-30
Shell Helix turn out unavailable in USA and shipping from Europe comes too expensive.


Notable differences:
The lowest iron (9 @ 4,500kms) compared to both MB Branded 229.52 (14 @ 4,500kms) and Mobil 1 ESP (17 @ 4,200kms)
Lower additive metals than the other two, higher TBN compared to Mobil, but lower TBN compared to MB
Low Molybdenum like the MB
Much lower Boron than both the other two
Very low oxidation compared to the Mobil, which in turn showed less than the MB (measured in terms of insolubles).
Some concluding notes so far:
All three oils exhibit significantly different formulations.
Amsoil is the best performer so far on iron, with MB next, and Mobil 1 in last
Mobil 1 exhibits some concerning thickening trends
MB thins a little then starts thickening, which is a more expected trend on a diesel
No info on Amsoil's viscosity trends yet.

IRON:
MB - 14 (4500km), 20 (10,000km), 38 (18,000km)
M1 - 17 (4200km), 26 (10,110km)
AMS- 9 (4500km), 18 (10,070km)
VISCOSITY
MB - 12.01 (4500km), 11.86 (10,000km), 12.17 (18,000km) 5W30??
M1 - 11.42 (4200km), 11.87 (10,110km) 0W30
AMS- 13.5 (4500km), 13.4 (10,070km) 5W40
TBN
MB - n/a (4500km), 6.4 (10,000km), 4.6 (18,000km) HC
M1 - 5.4 (4200km), 4.2 (10,110km) PAO
AMS- 6.05 (4500km), 5.38 (10,070km) PAO
Ams oil is slightly in the lead compared to MB and well ahead of M1

IRON:
MB - 14 (4500km), 20 (10,000km), 38 (18,000km)
M1 - 17 (4200km), 26 (10,110km)
AMS- 9 (4500km), 18 (10,070km)
VISCOSITY
MB - 12.01 (4500km), 11.86 (10,000km), 12.17 (18,000km) 5W30??
M1 - 11.42 (4200km), 11.87 (10,110km) 0W30
AMS- 13.5 (4500km), 13.4 (10,070km) 5W40
TBN
MB - n/a (4500km), 6.4 (10,000km), 4.6 (18,000km) HC
M1 - 5.4 (4200km), 4.2 (10,110km) PAO
AMS- 6.05 (4500km), 5.38 (10,070km) PAO
Ams oil is slightly in the lead compared to MB and well ahead of M1
The M1 is probably kinder to emissions gear ~ it is a trade off but so marginal here as not to matter.
BTW the Moly is a high temperature antioxidant developed by our additive company & sold to ExxonMobil.
Of more importance here, was there any top up during the respective runs?

I agree, even though the iron levels are higher with the M1, still not at any significant levels.




I will have my 10,000km test soon.