Daimler may be fined 1 billion euros for Mercedes diesel cheating
https://www.caradvice.com.au/782955/...t-fine-report/
https://www.caradvice.com.au/782955/...t-fine-report/
Further down in the article it states at least 280,000 C-Class and E-Class vehicles sold in Germany.
For one thing, our resale values have now been screwed. Any informed buyer would not like this news. As a secondary matter, we can hope for a good settlement from MB USA.
Last edited by mellonc; Aug 19, 2019 at 02:28 PM.




Still would they give me 3 grands settlement, I would not object.
https://www.daimler.com/innovation/d...ecall-faq.html
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Since I could not get reliable answers back from the forum, I did some digging.....
Euro 6 emissions standards (diesel)
CO: 0.50g/kmHC + NOx: 0.17g/km
NOx: 0.08g/km
PM: 0.005g/km
PN [#/km]: 6.0x10 ^11/km
Source: https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/advice/e...ons-standards/
US NOx limit is 0.04 g/km
PM requirement is a bit hazy as I don't really think it applies to individual cars except in CA. this website* says about 0.08 milligrams per miles which translates to about 0.0018g/km.
*https://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld_t3.php




To top it - never have heard about anybody in USA checking NOx on small vehicles.
Comparing the 2 is not going to bring you any resolution to the subject.
Last edited by kajtek1; Aug 26, 2019 at 02:12 PM.
As higher Cetane number generally reduces emissions, the CA emissions requirements are indeed more stringent for Diesel than in Europe.
Anyways, look at the way the Volkswagen scandal started. It was California Air Resources Board (which led to EPA results) that started this by ordering up results from smog tests from different countries because the results were so different. We have the exact same formula here.




As higher Cetane number generally reduces emissions, the CA emissions requirements are indeed more stringent for Diesel than in Europe.
Anyways, look at the way the Volkswagen scandal started. It was California Air Resources Board (which led to EPA results) that started this by ordering up results from smog tests from different countries because the results were so different. We have the exact same formula here.




Typical propaganda is to post couple of real facts, to catch reader attention since plain lies would turn him away and then - speculate in promoted direction using lot of slogans, who have nothing to do with facts.
Bottom line is, that with some practice you can learn to pull those couple of real facts from a page of BS.
Here is what I read


