E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

E350 Mpg?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old May 12, 2006 | 12:06 AM
  #1  
parkums's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
E350 Mpg?

What are you all getting for MPG for E350? I just got a 2006 E350 Sport and my MPG is terrible. 19 Gallon tank and I'm not even getting 330 miles (hw + city) a tank!

Hope it gets better...
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 09:40 AM
  #2  
csumt76's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 755
Likes: 2
From: USA
LS7 powered Corvette
I average a combined 21-22mpg. Thats highway/city driving.

On a trip from south Florida to Dallas, I averaged almost exactly 27mpg.

When i lived in south Florida with city driving, I was getting around 18mpg.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 10:42 AM
  #3  
revstriker's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,161
Likes: 1
From: Obama Land
K Car
Originally Posted by parkums
What are you all getting for MPG for E350? I just got a 2006 E350 Sport and my MPG is terrible. 19 Gallon tank and I'm not even getting 330 miles (hw + city) a tank!

Hope it gets better...
I get anywhere from 19-21.

I'm not sure why you're so surprised. The car is only rated at 19 mpg, and as we all know, that's under optimal city driving. Turn on your AC, get a little heavy on the gas, and the city mpg could easily be down around 16-17. Did you not research the car before you bought it?
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #4  
Stricks's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Mirage
2011 E63, 2018 AMG GT Convertible
My 320 gets about the same. Rarely less than 20 mpg around town and up to 29 on the freeway. Air is always on and the ride gets "goosed" to get around the SUVs with women drivers talking on their cell phone with kids in the back seat and NOT paying attention to anything around them . But I digresss . . . even my 600 stayed in the high teens until it got "goosed" and then, well . . . that's what a V12 is all about!
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #5  
sklasse's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by revstriker
I get anywhere from 19-21.

I'm not sure why you're so surprised. The car is only rated at 19 mpg, and as we all know, that's under optimal city driving. Turn on your AC, get a little heavy on the gas, and the city mpg could easily be down around 16-17. Did you not research the car before you bought it?

no I didn't research this aspect, but now that I know...

Thanks !

gas mileage is one of the highest in the nation , we pay 3.57 - 3.65 this week in Lower New York....thats for supreme. My v4 10-year camry takes regular and dumps 30 mpg on city driving..

Go Figure, I guess there was a reason why the Japanese are quickly becoming No 1 in the world.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 01:24 PM
  #6  
MB Fanatic's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 1
From: South Orange County, CA
4 wheels
Originally Posted by sklasse
no I didn't research this aspect, but now that I know...

Thanks !

gas mileage is one of the highest in the nation , we pay 3.57 - 3.65 this week in Lower New York....thats for supreme. My v4 10-year camry takes regular and dumps 30 mpg on city driving..

Go Figure, I guess there was a reason why the Japanese are quickly becoming No 1 in the world.
Well then you should have bought a Camry. When I had my E350 I got 30mpg on a single trip from LA to Sacramento. In the city I was averaging around 20mpg. Seems pretty normal to me for a car that weight 3500lbs.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 02:23 PM
  #7  
jagata's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 2
From: So. Cal
S6 LP640 E500
I just filled my tank up last night for the first time, the clock reads 480 miles and I bought the car with 50 miles on it. So I guess it ran around 400 miles on a full tank.

2006 e350
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #8  
revstriker's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,161
Likes: 1
From: Obama Land
K Car
Originally Posted by sklasse
no I didn't research this aspect, but now that I know...

Thanks !

gas mileage is one of the highest in the nation , we pay 3.57 - 3.65 this week in Lower New York....thats for supreme. My v4 10-year camry takes regular and dumps 30 mpg on city driving..

Go Figure, I guess there was a reason why the Japanese are quickly becoming No 1 in the world.
If gas mileage on a car was a big issue with me, I'd probably opt for a diesel over a Jap car. The E320 CDI would be a good pick.

Originally Posted by MB Fanatic
Well then you should have bought a Camry. When I had my E350 I got 30mpg on a single trip from LA to Sacramento. In the city I was averaging around 20mpg. Seems pretty normal to me for a car that weight 3500lbs
The highway mileage on this car is rated at about 27 mpg so if you got 30 on a trip, you were doing very well!
Reply
Old May 13, 2006 | 08:42 PM
  #9  
bm75204's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
SL550
I'm at about 17 mpg with mostly city driving, around 22 mpg mostly highway. Hope it improves as the car breaks in.
Reply
Old May 13, 2006 | 10:24 PM
  #10  
JLP's Avatar
JLP
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
06 E-55-95-F355S- 99 Porsche 911 C2 w mods
Originally Posted by sklasse
My v4 10-year camry takes regular and dumps 30 mpg on city driving..

Go Figure, I guess there was a reason why the Japanese are quickly becoming No 1 in the world.
Your 10 year old camry has an inline 4. No car imported into North America has a V-4, actually I'm pretty certain that a V-4 doesn't even exist. And comparing a 4 cylinder with around 150 horsepower to a 268 horsepower 6 cylinder is a little silly, how do you expect a car with 118 more horsepower that weighs more to get the same or better gas mileage?

Last edited by JLP; May 13, 2006 at 10:36 PM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #11  
LNL's Avatar
LNL
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
C300
Originally Posted by JLP
...actually I'm pretty certain that a V-4 doesn't even exist...
Saab imported a Sonnett with a V4 into the States in the late 60's, early 70's. One of my friends had a red one. It was quite an interesting car.

When Saab started using the Ford Taunus V4 engine in their other models, they also wanted to use it in the Sonett II. The car was redesigned and renamed the Sonett V4, with the 1500 cc Ford V4. A new hood was designed by Gunnar A. Sjögren, with a 'bulge', necessary to fit the higher engine. The bulge was slightly offset to the right, so that it would not obstruct the driver's view. The engine produced 65 hp (48 kW) and the Sonett V4 made 0 to 100 km/h in 12.5 s, with a top speed of 160 km/h.
In total, only 1868 Sonett IIs and V4s were produced.
Source: http://www.thesaabsite.com/sonnetinfo.htm

Specs: http://www.saab-v4.co.uk/technical.asp

Lou
Reply
Old May 13, 2006 | 11:02 PM
  #12  
JLP's Avatar
JLP
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
06 E-55-95-F355S- 99 Porsche 911 C2 w mods
I knew that they did exist.........but no longer and certainly not imported into the US.
Reply
Old May 14, 2006 | 02:00 PM
  #13  
aceman's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 528
Likes: 5
E500 4matic, 2014 GL320, 2013 C300, 2015 Stingray
That's odd...

I have a e500 4matic w/ 24000 miles on it and constantly get 20-22 mpg w/ 70%hwy, 30%stop/go...
Reply
Old May 15, 2006 | 03:10 AM
  #14  
CJ_E350's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
2004 E55
E350 Sport

Have the E350 Sport as well and I'm getting 19-21mpg. Could do better if you change the transmission to Comfort mode (C). I am having so much fun with this car - I was very calm during break in, but have been driving it like I stole it ever since. Once I calm down, I can get a more accurate read on the MPG. I work out of my house so I don't have a consistent commute to track the MPG...I'm running stop light to stop light.

Woohoo
Reply
Old May 15, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #15  
Crash's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
2006 E350 2003 ML350
Mpg

City driving I average about 16-17 but on a recent trip from LA to Las Vegas I hit 30 mpg while doing 75-80 the whole way. I was surprised, but happy, to get 30 mpg while driving at nearly 80.
Reply
Old May 15, 2006 | 01:07 PM
  #16  
MB Fanatic's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 1
From: South Orange County, CA
4 wheels
Originally Posted by Crash
City driving I average about 16-17 but on a recent trip from LA to Las Vegas I hit 30 mpg while doing 75-80 the whole way. I was surprised, but happy, to get 30 mpg while driving at nearly 80.
that 7 speed transmission plus DOHC, and other marvels built into the drivetrain help a lot. I kinda miss the E350.
Reply
Old May 15, 2006 | 03:59 PM
  #17  
luxury1's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
E320 with 32 PSI in my 18 AMG wheels. 25.6 MPG! (mostly highway and no AC)...
Reply
Old May 15, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #18  
MB Fanatic's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 1
From: South Orange County, CA
4 wheels
Originally Posted by luxury1
E320 with 32 PSI in my 18 AMG wheels. 25.6 MPG! (mostly highway and no AC)...
Try 35 psi all around. It should make a big difference.
Reply
Old May 15, 2006 | 08:52 PM
  #19  
HELL ONA HARLEY's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: THE NAPA VALLEY, CA
Build date 2-04 E500
Originally Posted by aceman
I have a e500 4matic w/ 24000 miles on it and constantly get 20-22 mpg w/ 70%hwy, 30%stop/go...


Yea, close to the same story here with my 04 e500 with over 30,000 miles..... averaging nearly 19 mpg city and a high of 27mpg on the long hauls. Not bad for a V8

Last edited by HELL ONA HARLEY; May 15, 2006 at 08:54 PM.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 08:27 AM
  #20  
Mr.Gearhead's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta suburbs
2008 Aspen, 1970 Corvette, 2000 Corvette and 2009 Legacy Limited
Talking

2006 E350... non sport. I am getting about 20 mpg as an average... but... It does get sideways and nice burnouts with a V6... I can only imagine what an E55 will do... burnouts must be awesome... HaHHAHA

Gas mileage is not on my top 10 list.

1.burnouts
2.acceleration
3.lateral movement (donuts...)
4.1/4 times (although don't race much...)
5.interior fit and finish
6.luxury
7.burnouts
8.braking
9.handling
10.price... (under 60K)

did I mention burnouts... hahaha... I have a 70 Vette that is essentially a large go kart... I can get sideways on three forward gears and a little "chirp" in fourth... Wouldn't it be great to get a little "chirp" in SEVENTH? muhaaaa.

Gas mileage isn't a factor for me... it is all about performance/luxury/price/fun factor. And yes... I am a 35 year old child that refuses to take life too seriously... have fun!
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #21  
X72's Avatar
X72
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 274
Likes: 2
From: Georgia, USA
Honda Accord
When I read a post like parkums, it makes me hope that fuel costs stay at least in the $3-$4/gallon range for at least another year to get people like parkums (people sensitive to fuel price) to put fuel economy as a higher priority when choosing a car and educating themselves about fuel economy and what to espect from those EPA fuel economy ratings before they buy. I don't think it is a coincidence that GM is dropping the H1.

Addendum: Consumer Reports posts their real world mpg findings when they test cars. It is a real eye opener when compared to what the EPA figures are listed as in comparison. I don't wish you ill parkums; it is just that much learning requires pain.

Last edited by X72; May 16, 2006 at 09:46 AM.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 09:54 AM
  #22  
revstriker's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,161
Likes: 1
From: Obama Land
K Car
Originally Posted by X72
When I read a post like parkums, it makes me hope that fuel costs stay at least in the $3-$4/gallon range for at least another year to get people like parkums (people sensitive to fuel price) to put fuel economy as a higher priority when choosing a car and educating themselves about fuel economy and what to espect from those EPA fuel economy ratings before they buy. I don't think it is a coincidence that GM is dropping the H1.

Addendum: Consumer Reports posts their real world mpg findings when they test cars. It is a real eye opener when compared to what the EPA figures are listed as in comparison. I don't wish you ill parkums; it is just that much learning requires pain.
I'm not sure I understand you point. Why do you wish people get "educated" about the EPA fuel economy ratings by paying higher prices in gas? I too wish the MPG listings were "real world" rather than optimal, and I wish that people would better educate themselves on all aspects of a high dollar purchase. I just don't agree that we need high gasoline prices to achieve this.

As for GM dropping H1s, I really don't think the cost of fuel was that much of a factor (although it could have been the straw that broke the camels back). When you start getting into 6 figure vehicles, I don't think MPG is that big of an issue. I think it had to do more with high value SUVs becoming more "sporty", and less "utility" in looks.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #23  
06E350Sport's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
2006 E350 Sport
Mpg

I'm averaging 22.5 MPG on 40 mi. commute from Thousand Oaks to Beverly Hills, 30 miles of freeway, 10 miles of surface streets, all heavy traffic. I leave the trans in Comfort as the downshifts are much smoother. I'm enjoying the performance and economy of the little V-6! We just ended our lease on an '03 BMW540i Sport, and went to the E350 due to the higher gas prices as of late.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #24  
Mr.Gearhead's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta suburbs
2008 Aspen, 1970 Corvette, 2000 Corvette and 2009 Legacy Limited
no offense...but... if I ever purchase a car because of MPG... take my license away. The way I look at is... as stated in another post... if the gas is too expensive... maybe the car payment is too...

Can you imagine buying an E55 and not drive it due to MPG? Sorry, it is not something I considering when looking at a new vehicle. I bet my 70 Vett gets 12 MPG. What is the saying... "I pass everything but a gas station"

For those MPG aware, good deal. But a Benz is not the way to go... maybe a VW TDI or Honda Hybrid. Hey... I hear the Hybird can do burnouts! heheheh
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #25  
SAguirre's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 8
From: Longmont, CO
04 E320 4 Matic, 95 Audi S6, 99 Carrera 4 Cabrio, 12 Fiat 500 Sport, 00 BMW R1200C 10, BMW R1200R
Back to the original question. I have a 5-speed 4-matic that I think does quite well. If I drive it strictly in town in the winter (letting the car warm up long enough to drop below 1000 rpms before putting it in gear which is about 1 minute). I get about 20 MPGs. This is about the worst driving I do.

Otherwise, with summer tires and little warm up time I get about 22 around town. On highway trips when I can keep below 90 MPH, I get a solid 29 MPGs with summer tires. If I drive with snow tires and a ski rack then it drops to 24 MPGs.

On some rear occasions I have actually averaged 32 MPGs on one tank. All highway and not driving faster than 65. In the end, I think that the EPA rating for my car is quite accurate. 18 city and 24 highway. Seeing that I never drop as low as 18 MPGs my driving habits must be in line with the test simulation.

It should also be noted that I don’t drive slowly either. The E350 is supposed to get better MPGs than the E320 because of the 7-G transmission, but the minute you compare an E350 4-Matic with an E320 4-matic, the E320 4-Matic gets considerably better mileage since they are both using a 5-G transmission.

Steve

Last edited by SAguirre; May 17, 2006 at 10:39 AM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 AM.