SBC Brake Reliability





Those who have experienced SBC failure, are usually not able to comment how the back-up brake system worked. My guess is that drivers do not realise that the car would still brake but would need much more brake force and drivers do not realise that.
The SBC pump etc. have their life time but if the different recalls have been done, the system should indicate the need for service well in time to avoid a total electrical portion failure while driving.
I know the incident sounds dramatic, and was certainly very scary, but since they fixed this issue, I have had no problems at all. I'm convinced that its not likely to happen again and I will continue to be confident in my E. Its a great performer overall.
Trending Topics
We've thankfully never experience any dramatic failure or fault on the system, but the non-linear brake feel was clear and present and made braking rather clumsy.
Thankfully they returned to a vacuum boosted braking system beginning in '07 so I don't have it on my E63.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
. She pulled over and stopped. But then turned the engine off and restarted and drove home with everything normal. But I got into the car started backed up and got all the red failure lights again with 2 malfunctions showing in the maint. window. I parked the car called a tow truck and the car is on the way to the dealer. ALL TECH SERVICE ISSUES and RECALLS are updated on this car. Starting the car to pull it up to the tow truck all systems were normal again but we refuse to drive the car until safety issues are resolved. NTSB complaint will be next up
. Jim
Brake Control (SBC) from some of their models, starting with the E-
Class.
The SBC system has been a chronic thorn in Mercedes' side.
Manufactured by the Robert Bosch Group, the SBC system has led to the
recall of over 2 million Mercedes models (namely the E-Class), and
has played an integral part in the widespread "Mercedes quality
problems" you hear about so often.
So what exactly is the SBC Braking system? I'll try to sum it up in a
nutshell. The SBC braking system uses a microcomputer to monitor the
car and driver actions. In the event it's needed, such as emergency
braking, the system monitors brake pressure, and applies the
appropriate stopping power necessary, even if the driver doesn't
exert enough power.
SBC features a host of other features as well, including distributing
brake force to different wheels during cornering, to ensure greater
stability in the vehicle as well as maximum stopping power; the SBC
system even dries the brake discs if a film of water forms on them.
In other words, the system sounds like a milestone achievement in
braking technology, and it would be, assuming it worked properly.
Unfortunately, although the intent was good, the execution was not.
As you can probably tell, the entire system relied on electronics,
and as I'm sure everyone can attest to, nothing is more prone to
malfunctioning than electronics. And that is exactly what happened.
Before long, wiring in the SBC braking system deteriorated, and
suddenly the SBC system no longer functioned.
Of course, Mercedes had a backup hydraulic-only braking system in
place, but the feeling of suddenly not having the same stopping power
was enough to send Mercedes' owners everywhere heading for the hills
- and you haven't stopped hearing about Mercedes quality problems since.
Apparently, Mercedes is finally getting tired of trying to convince
consumers of the benefits of the SBC system. Although the system is,
in my opinion, a definite advancement in braking technology, poor
implementation and poor design are ultimately leading to its downfall.
That's not to say Mercedes will entirely scrap the SBC system. I'm
sure Mercedes will continue to develop and improve the braking system
in the future; I just have a feeling the next generation of SBC will
be slightly less prone to malfunctioning.
Does anybody know if this is the symptom for brake failure or have similar problem? Your expert opinion would be very much appreciated.
Last edited by Heejin; Nov 20, 2007 at 01:38 AM.
The fact that your wife just restarted the car and continued to drive should alarm you! If she had an accident after continuing to drive after seeing that message would you expect MB to admit liability?
The fact that your wife just restarted the car and continued to drive should alarm you! If she had an accident after continuing to drive after seeing that message would you expect MB to admit liability?
1) She continued to drive 1 mile to the house (to clear the roadway) at 5 mph using the park brake to stop and I would have done the same.
So YES I would expect MB to still be responsible for the functionality of the brake system.
2) The car WAS towed to the MB dealer.
3) To convince me the problem is corrected.
Mechanical/Electrical/Hydraulic systems do not heal with out human effort. There is a defect, hardware, component, hose, or line of code that results in failure.
Therefore to convince me the correction is completed to the best humanly possible. (Humans do fail)
Show me the defect:
a) Broken part
b) Defective hydraulic valve / controller etc
c) Failed electrical part
d) Revised codes or program update and version #
What I do not accept that we get many times.
"Problem could not be duplicated in shop"
Hope this helps. The NTSB report was filed yesterday. If this brake system is a problem the NTSB can track the data and then given the data make decisions if this is a highway safety issue. IMO it is.
Tough being an engineer,, but someone has to be one.
Consider:
Failure of hot water valve at 25,000 miles
Brakes every 30,000 miles
Ball Joints at 70k
SBC total brake failure at 72K
Not a very good record. My Lincolns had less shop time than the MB for much less $$.



