PIC REQUEST: w211's slammed or lowered :)
Current camber specs (Rears -2.13/-2.19 Front -2.43/-2.3). K-Mac bushings (front and rears) should bring them within specs since they have a +-1.75 adjustment range. The vehicle is going in tomorrow to install the K-Macs (bushings delivery expected today), I could have attempted to replace bushings myself but I let the experts do it on their lift. No doubt it will go back to Cherry Hill MB for another alignment.
Camber: Rears -1.3/-1.5 Front -1.4/-1.4
Toe: Rears .09/.24 Front .11/.10
Total labor 8hrs bushings and 1 hr alignment: Cost $858.09
I'll order 15mm spacers tonight for the front wheels to complete the picture
Last edited by pinebaron; Jun 4, 2013 at 07:16 PM.
Is this needed on AirMatic? Will I be fine besides tire wear if I have the ~2.4 degrees of negative camber all around?
Is this needed on AirMatic? Will I be fine besides tire wear if I have the ~2.4 degrees of negative camber all around?
The car handled perfectly fine before camber correction. Camber can actually improve handling, especially on cornering. The entire change, awesome Bilstein IRc shocks, lowering to almost maximum limits (considering wider tires I'm using) adding significant camber etc. was a massive change, to my aggressive style of driving. Prior to K-Macs etc change, the car really handled extremely well, like on rails and to quote my daughter who was here last weekend "Papa, your car is like driving on cream" which made my son sneer; he drives a lowered S-Class.
Camber correction was more in my
mind than a requirement or need.It may look a little better (that is debatible), may improve tire wear, then again not really, since I'm using staggered wheels, though I can always swap tires on each axle. I'm not an expert on any of this stuff, it's just scattered knowledge I've gained from the forum and my son (his cars are lowered).
Is this needed on AirMatic? Your airmatic may be different, I have zero experience with it. My son's S-Class has airmatic and he lowered it using a module or something. Look around the forum and see how others have done it on airmatics.
If anything I would think it would help cornering... but I don't want to lower my car if I have to spend $900 to just get the camber correct.
Please don't follow my example if you are thinking about keeping costs down, I'm a little crazy about getting things right, nothing is perfect to me, have a bad attitude to everything, will spend(actually waste) any amount of time and money to improve stuff. Camber correction cost me over $2K including initial alignment at CHMB, K-Macs installation and realignment by the installing shop (Mill Street Tires, Moorestown NJ). I may take it back to CHMB to get an opinion on another re-alignment.
Will I be fine besides tire wear if I have the ~2.4 degrees of negative camber all around?: Probably! Please seek opinion of experts and knowledgeable resources on the forum and elsewhere.
negative camber will affect handling, i don't think anyone here will be able to notice daily driving but your tire makes less contact with the ground the more negative you go.
lastly does camber cause premature tire wear? well, that has been the biggest debate for a long time.. a lot of people say that if just your toe is aligned then you will be ok, running a low negative camber number like 2 degrees you'll be fine i think. my 211 is running about 4-4.5 degrees negative and my daily driver is almost at negative 5.5-6 degrees.
Last edited by pinebaron; Jun 6, 2013 at 06:57 AM.
mind than a requirement or need.It may look a little better (that is debatible), may improve tire wear, then again not really, since I'm using staggered wheels, though I can always swap tires on each axle. I'm not an expert on any of this stuff, it's just scattered knowledge I've gained from the forum and my son (his cars are lowered).
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

























