Motortrend: Night View Assist Test
08-05-2009, 10:23 AM
#1
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK300, GLK350, owned:C300, CLK 430, ML320 200D, 240D
Motortrend: Night View Assist Test
Nice read with a cool movie. They are driven a mountain pass with 48 hairpin bends at night without headlights on:
http://www.motortrend.com/features/c...est/index.html
http://www.motortrend.com/features/c...est/index.html
Last edited by Octane; 08-05-2009 at 10:46 AM.
08-05-2009, 09:33 PM
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Pretty cool.
Trending Topics
08-29-2009, 03:55 AM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M-B GLE, Porsche 911 Turbo, Porsche Boxster (spouse)
It would be if the display were projected on the windshield...a heads-up-display (HUD).
As it is (except in this video where there were no outside visual cues by design), you need a passenger to monitor the night-view screen because no sane driver is going to take his eyes off the road long enough in low-visibility conditions to really focus on the screen.
The owner's manual, which tries to make this device as litigation proof as the lawyers believe possible, has so many usage disclaimers as to make it virtually impossible to use the night-vision assist's true capabilities when you need them most (and as designed).
There are no shortcomings in the device itself, only in the implementation...the data projection. And moving technologically forward to a heads-up-display would solve that problem and truly make this a world-class safety feature. Mercedes' low-light technology trumps rival BMW's but without a HUD, which BMW already has, the Mercedes technology can't realize it's full potential.
Note: I know a thing or two about using HUDs...I'm a USAF F-16 pilot and we are able to do the job of two pilots in many other fighters in part because of a HUD which allows us to keep our eyes out of the cockpit while still having instant access to the most critical information.
As it is (except in this video where there were no outside visual cues by design), you need a passenger to monitor the night-view screen because no sane driver is going to take his eyes off the road long enough in low-visibility conditions to really focus on the screen.
The owner's manual, which tries to make this device as litigation proof as the lawyers believe possible, has so many usage disclaimers as to make it virtually impossible to use the night-vision assist's true capabilities when you need them most (and as designed).
There are no shortcomings in the device itself, only in the implementation...the data projection. And moving technologically forward to a heads-up-display would solve that problem and truly make this a world-class safety feature. Mercedes' low-light technology trumps rival BMW's but without a HUD, which BMW already has, the Mercedes technology can't realize it's full potential.
Note: I know a thing or two about using HUDs...I'm a USAF F-16 pilot and we are able to do the job of two pilots in many other fighters in part because of a HUD which allows us to keep our eyes out of the cockpit while still having instant access to the most critical information.
08-29-2009, 05:43 PM
#9
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MY2001 C320
Good point. I wonder if projecting an image on HUD would distract a layman from driving, unlike fighter pilots who receive professional training and HUD is second nature.
