2010 W212 E550 vs. 2007-09 CLS550??
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore MD
MB, BMW
2010 W212 E550 vs. 2007-09 CLS550??
hi,
i'm thinking about getting a 07-09 CLS550 w/ amg sport, premium, park sensors and trim pkg. i really like the way the CLS looks, but i heard it is based on the old W211 chassis, which has been around since like '03?
i know firsthand how crappy '00-'06 benzes were, so i'm a bit weary of the CLS. how would a 2009 CLS550 compare to the 2010 E550? is 2010 E550 *greatly* better in every way, (chassis, technology, electronics, build quality, reliability, etc) than the CLS550?
i'm thinking about getting a 07-09 CLS550 w/ amg sport, premium, park sensors and trim pkg. i really like the way the CLS looks, but i heard it is based on the old W211 chassis, which has been around since like '03?
i know firsthand how crappy '00-'06 benzes were, so i'm a bit weary of the CLS. how would a 2009 CLS550 compare to the 2010 E550? is 2010 E550 *greatly* better in every way, (chassis, technology, electronics, build quality, reliability, etc) than the CLS550?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 11
From: GMT -8 hours
Mercedes-Benz
I think the E550 is a better car. I had an 08 CLS550 and would rent 2010 E350s and always liked the drive of the W212 E-class more than the CLS (except the power). E550 i think is the way to go.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
That's a tough one to me. Most enthusiasts adore the CLS's styling, and would prefer that aspect over the E-Class, but I'm not tooo crazy about the CLS, and am hit/miss with the 212 for the most part.
If I did prefer the CLS's looks by a longshot I'd probably go with it. However, since that isn't really the case, I'd maaybe go 212, as you get the more advanced chassis and safety, and being newer, more Warranty.
Interior is no contest for me, the CLS has the W211 style, which makes use of better materials (and design, IMO), and goes extra steps with even more exclusivity and fanciness (i.e gaudiness really, if that's your thing).
Actually, by '06 the W211's got pretty solid in reliability, about on par with newer M-B's, and considering the CLS came out at that time, I'd say dependability should be on par with the W221 S generations.
As well, remember, the CLS will always be a flashier and more exclusive design, and more of an "attention grabber", especially once 212's become commonplace. If you're into that, notch another up for the CLS.
Tough one for me.
If I did prefer the CLS's looks by a longshot I'd probably go with it. However, since that isn't really the case, I'd maaybe go 212, as you get the more advanced chassis and safety, and being newer, more Warranty.
Interior is no contest for me, the CLS has the W211 style, which makes use of better materials (and design, IMO), and goes extra steps with even more exclusivity and fanciness (i.e gaudiness really, if that's your thing).
Actually, by '06 the W211's got pretty solid in reliability, about on par with newer M-B's, and considering the CLS came out at that time, I'd say dependability should be on par with the W221 S generations.
As well, remember, the CLS will always be a flashier and more exclusive design, and more of an "attention grabber", especially once 212's become commonplace. If you're into that, notch another up for the CLS.
Tough one for me.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 59
From: Los Angeles
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
it really depends on what style you like better. tech is probably better in E class, but 09 CLS got nicer nav and features as well. also, new CLS will be coming out soon too, so W212 is newer design.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Utah
2010 E550 4matic
Have owned both and can compare for you.
ProV1,
I had a 2006 CLS launch edition for 4 years and traded it in December for a 2010 E550 4M. Although the CLS had the lower output 500 V8, I can still offer you a pretty good comparison.
The CLS was absolutely gorgeous inside and out and was truly a joy to look at. But unfortunately the poor sight lines and large blind spot made it difficult to drive in traffic and parallel park. Handling was OK and ride was very smooth.
My new E550 is a nice looking car but does not have the same interior and exterior "wow factor" as the CLS. When you start the engine and drive, however, it is a remarkable vehicle -- beautiful sight lines and visibility, terrific handling and amazing technology (bluetooth, voice dialing and nav, adaptive high-beams). And then there's the powerful 550 V8, that makes it a small rocket.
So I think your choice comes down to whether you want a great looking car or a great driving car. For me, although I liked my CLS, I absolutely love my E550. Even if they were the same price (and the MSRP on my my CLS was $10K more than my loaded E550), I'd choose the E550 again every time.
Have fun deciding -- it's a nice problem to have!
I had a 2006 CLS launch edition for 4 years and traded it in December for a 2010 E550 4M. Although the CLS had the lower output 500 V8, I can still offer you a pretty good comparison.
The CLS was absolutely gorgeous inside and out and was truly a joy to look at. But unfortunately the poor sight lines and large blind spot made it difficult to drive in traffic and parallel park. Handling was OK and ride was very smooth.
My new E550 is a nice looking car but does not have the same interior and exterior "wow factor" as the CLS. When you start the engine and drive, however, it is a remarkable vehicle -- beautiful sight lines and visibility, terrific handling and amazing technology (bluetooth, voice dialing and nav, adaptive high-beams). And then there's the powerful 550 V8, that makes it a small rocket.
So I think your choice comes down to whether you want a great looking car or a great driving car. For me, although I liked my CLS, I absolutely love my E550. Even if they were the same price (and the MSRP on my my CLS was $10K more than my loaded E550), I'd choose the E550 again every time.
Have fun deciding -- it's a nice problem to have!
Last edited by FrozenNorth; Mar 13, 2010 at 10:43 AM. Reason: typo
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Canada
2010 E63, Iridium Silver, Black, Dark Ash, Distronic Plus, Night Vision, Premium
hi,
i'm thinking about getting a 07-09 CLS550 w/ amg sport, premium, park sensors and trim pkg. i really like the way the CLS looks, but i heard it is based on the old W211 chassis, which has been around since like '03?
i know firsthand how crappy '00-'06 benzes were, so i'm a bit weary of the CLS. how would a 2009 CLS550 compare to the 2010 E550? is 2010 E550 *greatly* better in every way, (chassis, technology, electronics, build quality, reliability, etc) than the CLS550?
i'm thinking about getting a 07-09 CLS550 w/ amg sport, premium, park sensors and trim pkg. i really like the way the CLS looks, but i heard it is based on the old W211 chassis, which has been around since like '03?
i know firsthand how crappy '00-'06 benzes were, so i'm a bit weary of the CLS. how would a 2009 CLS550 compare to the 2010 E550? is 2010 E550 *greatly* better in every way, (chassis, technology, electronics, build quality, reliability, etc) than the CLS550?
I loved the car, its finish, style, performance. I had it lowered (through
MB software changes) and it looked stunning. I had no mechanical or
software problems except the Keyless Go sensors in the handles which were replaced painlessly
with redesigned ones. I now have the E550C and agree the interior is C class
and I would give it an appropriate C grade, but love the sporty handling and the feel of this coupe.
I would advise against the current CLS for you not
just because it looks a bit tired now, but also because you will be
slaughtered on resale. For 2011 only a 5 month run is planned and the 2012
comes out next year with February production.
You will have two year's worth of depreciation in one year!
I plan to get the new gen CLS AMG next year - hoping they
would have worked out the bugs and IMPROVED the interior.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 8
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
^^^^
I'm confused. The OP is thinking of either a used CLS or a new E550. How would he get "slaughtered" with resale if he's buying used and when the PO will be the person getting the depreciation hit? He can pick up a used CLS dirt cheap. Buying a new E550 is where he'll lose out with on any resale.
I agree with FNorth, the CLS looks great on the outside but it's somewhat impractical on the inside with that dramatic roof line.
I'm confused. The OP is thinking of either a used CLS or a new E550. How would he get "slaughtered" with resale if he's buying used and when the PO will be the person getting the depreciation hit? He can pick up a used CLS dirt cheap. Buying a new E550 is where he'll lose out with on any resale.
I agree with FNorth, the CLS looks great on the outside but it's somewhat impractical on the inside with that dramatic roof line.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Canada
2010 E63, Iridium Silver, Black, Dark Ash, Distronic Plus, Night Vision, Premium
^^^^
I'm confused. The OP is thinking of either a used CLS or a new E550. How would he get "slaughtered" with resale if he's buying used and when the PO will be the person getting the depreciation hit? He can pick up a used CLS dirt cheap. Buying a new E550 is where he'll lose out with on any resale.
I agree with FNorth, the CLS looks great on the outside but it's somewhat impractical on the inside with that dramatic roof line.
I'm confused. The OP is thinking of either a used CLS or a new E550. How would he get "slaughtered" with resale if he's buying used and when the PO will be the person getting the depreciation hit? He can pick up a used CLS dirt cheap. Buying a new E550 is where he'll lose out with on any resale.
I agree with FNorth, the CLS looks great on the outside but it's somewhat impractical on the inside with that dramatic roof line.
can be still bought used / not ever registered, at "demo" price, which is still way
more than market price for a 2 year old car...
Besides, with the CLS there is plenty of opportunity get "slaughtered" even if you buy a used one
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 59
From: Los Angeles
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
whoever bought a benz for resale value 
jokes aside, i'd go with the E. i mean the CLS is nice, but i can't see myself in one everyday, kind of claustrophobic for me. like K-A, i'm not to crazy about it either. i also agree with frozennorth, you going for just stunning looks (which can be debatable since many don't like the CLS design) or looks/drivability? are you willing to sacrifice looks for functionality? besides, the E would be faster
in regards to dependability, the CLS was introduced for MY 2006. By MY 2006 MB worked out a lot of problems. i've never heard of any big problems on the CLS.
jokes aside, i'd go with the E. i mean the CLS is nice, but i can't see myself in one everyday, kind of claustrophobic for me. like K-A, i'm not to crazy about it either. i also agree with frozennorth, you going for just stunning looks (which can be debatable since many don't like the CLS design) or looks/drivability? are you willing to sacrifice looks for functionality? besides, the E would be faster
in regards to dependability, the CLS was introduced for MY 2006. By MY 2006 MB worked out a lot of problems. i've never heard of any big problems on the CLS.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
whoever bought a benz for resale value
jokes aside, i'd go with the E. i mean the CLS is nice, but i can't see myself in one everyday, kind of claustrophobic for me. like K-A, i'm not to crazy about it either. i also agree with frozennorth, you going for just stunning looks (which can be debatable since many don't like the CLS design) or looks/drivability? are you willing to sacrifice looks for functionality? besides, the E would be faster
in regards to dependability, the CLS was introduced for MY 2006. By MY 2006 MB worked out a lot of problems. i've never heard of any big problems on the CLS.
jokes aside, i'd go with the E. i mean the CLS is nice, but i can't see myself in one everyday, kind of claustrophobic for me. like K-A, i'm not to crazy about it either. i also agree with frozennorth, you going for just stunning looks (which can be debatable since many don't like the CLS design) or looks/drivability? are you willing to sacrifice looks for functionality? besides, the E would be faster
in regards to dependability, the CLS was introduced for MY 2006. By MY 2006 MB worked out a lot of problems. i've never heard of any big problems on the CLS.
Try sitting in a new Camaro, yeesh, TINY windows, and LOTS of cheap plastic (interior) surrounding you. I really thought of getting one as a DD when it came out, don't think it would make for a nice drive after a while.
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Canada
2010 E63, Iridium Silver, Black, Dark Ash, Distronic Plus, Night Vision, Premium
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 59
From: Los Angeles
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
+1 mbstar, not a practical car, if that is what someone is looking for.
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
1
As a old w211 owner..i can say..I truly loveeee my CLS... Not as practical as the w211 but simply the exterior styling 
..you either hate it or love it. I mean its basically a w211..only with a very fancy dress with the cleavage hanging out, sexyyyyy 
. I'm not a fan of the new boxy shaped w212, and I still think the CLS would be wayy more exclusive and not seen as much on the roads as the W212 within a year(eventho the CLS has been out for about 4 years). So based on exterior look and "exclusivity" I would recommend the CLS. However I'm sure the W212 has a MUCH better interior(electronic gadgets as well) as it is newer. But you could put newer gadgets in the CLS on your own as well.
..you either hate it or love it. I mean its basically a w211..only with a very fancy dress with the cleavage hanging out, sexyyyyy . I'm not a fan of the new boxy shaped w212, and I still think the CLS would be wayy more exclusive and not seen as much on the roads as the W212 within a year(eventho the CLS has been out for about 4 years). So based on exterior look and "exclusivity" I would recommend the CLS. However I'm sure the W212 has a MUCH better interior(electronic gadgets as well) as it is newer. But you could put newer gadgets in the CLS on your own as well.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
As a old w211 owner..i can say..I truly loveeee my CLS... Not as practical as the w211 but simply the exterior styling ..you either hate it or love it. I mean its basically a w211..only with a very fancy dress with the cleavage hanging out, sexyyyyy . I'm not a fan of the new boxy shaped w212, and I still think the CLS would be wayy more exclusive and not seen as much on the roads as the W212 within a year(eventho the CLS has been out for about 4 years). So based on exterior look and "exclusivity" I would recommend the CLS. However I'm sure the W212 has a MUCH better interior(electronic gadgets as well) as it is newer. But you could put newer gadgets in the CLS on your own as well.
..you either hate it or love it. I mean its basically a w211..only with a very fancy dress with the cleavage hanging out, sexyyyyy . I'm not a fan of the new boxy shaped w212, and I still think the CLS would be wayy more exclusive and not seen as much on the roads as the W212 within a year(eventho the CLS has been out for about 4 years). So based on exterior look and "exclusivity" I would recommend the CLS. However I'm sure the W212 has a MUCH better interior(electronic gadgets as well) as it is newer. But you could put newer gadgets in the CLS on your own as well.I see the CLS as looking like the W211 right after getting laid.
Actually, the CLS interior slaughters the W212's interior, no comparison. Unless you like hard plastic, or have kids/habits of dirtying stuff up, as the 212's plastic is easier to clean than the materials in the CLS/211.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 59
From: Los Angeles
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
ya, the 09s did not sell well at all (from what i see on the road), just like the SL.
the CLS interior is gorgeous, it's the w211 interior got ready for prom night
the CLS interior is gorgeous, it's the w211 interior got ready for prom night
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Problem with the CLS Sale-wise, as pretty as it is, it's a "fad" design, hot today, not tomorrow, not much lasting power in terms of desirability. As well, "regular" folk will find it to be a bit much.
I read somewhere that New CLS's are practically collecting dust on Dealer lots. I think this whole reality of all the above mentioned, is why M-B has shortened life-cycle of it, rather than the typical M-B 7 year production span.
I read somewhere that New CLS's are practically collecting dust on Dealer lots. I think this whole reality of all the above mentioned, is why M-B has shortened life-cycle of it, rather than the typical M-B 7 year production span.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 59
From: Los Angeles
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Problem with the CLS Sale-wise, as pretty as it is, it's a "fad" design, hot today, not tomorrow, not much lasting power in terms of desirability. As well, "regular" folk will find it to be a bit much.
I read somewhere that New CLS's are practically collecting dust on Dealer lots. I think this whole reality of all the above mentioned, is why M-B has shortened life-cycle of it, rather than the typical M-B 7 year production span.
I read somewhere that New CLS's are practically collecting dust on Dealer lots. I think this whole reality of all the above mentioned, is why M-B has shortened life-cycle of it, rather than the typical M-B 7 year production span.
ya, when they changed the SL for 09 with a 2nd facelift, you barely see any of the new ones the road. imagine, they even skipped the 2010 model. i think with that car the 07 - 08 (1st facelift) looked the best to me. the current version comes off odd to me in a way. probably many of the female drivers got turned off by the more aggressive new look.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 361
Likes: 55
From: Los Angeles, CA
2024 EQE350 SUV, 2022 SL55 AMGMG, 2022 C300
I was trying to compare CLS550 and E550 myself. I'm about to replace my E. I found this review: 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS550 4-Door Coupe vs. E550 Sedan. It gives you differences, cons and pros. And there is a conclusion at the end, that E550 is the clear winner. Check it out and see what you think...
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
They pretty much state the obvious there ^^^^.
E550 is the better and more efficient car, and the CLS sacrifices a lot for what can be a polarizing design, which people who see it on the plus side, will find far more alluring than the more plebeian E.
One thing to note, the Article is off on the "Aerodynamic" statement. The CLS LOOKS Aero, however it has a horrible Drag Coefficient, it gets a .32 I believe, where's the W211 gets a .26, and the W212, .25. How the CLS gets such worse Drag when it looks so much more aero is beyond me.
.
E550 is the better and more efficient car, and the CLS sacrifices a lot for what can be a polarizing design, which people who see it on the plus side, will find far more alluring than the more plebeian E.
One thing to note, the Article is off on the "Aerodynamic" statement. The CLS LOOKS Aero, however it has a horrible Drag Coefficient, it gets a .32 I believe, where's the W211 gets a .26, and the W212, .25. How the CLS gets such worse Drag when it looks so much more aero is beyond me.
.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 361
Likes: 55
From: Los Angeles, CA
2024 EQE350 SUV, 2022 SL55 AMGMG, 2022 C300
Basically, to have such wide ground clearance - does not help to have a decent coefficient of drag...
