E class 7 speed Auto transmission

http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/WebX?14@@.f21ba34/0
So, how is 7 sp auto in E-class, The automatic downshifts acceleration is normally smooth and no transmission jerkiness at low speeds?
As for the tranny in the E; its smooth like butter. In E mode you can barely feel the shifts while in S they are more noticable but by no means I would call them harsh or jarring (like an M5). The only thing I don't like about the MB tranny is when using the paddle shifters they are slow. You pull the lever and about 1/2 a second later the shift happens. There is my one and only gripe with the tranny.
Last edited by LaicepsYdobon; May 5, 2011 at 08:03 AM.

Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

. If you do not mind, would you please explain/elaborate more on what issues being reported!?
F10 has a lot of documented and consistent problems, and the pre-9/10 models are known to be "avoided at all costs".
Aside from obvious occasional issues here and there, the W212 has been rock solid since its launch, far more reliable and less fussy on a grand scale than the F10. This is from anecdotal research, and reputable "data sources", who rank the W212 and M-B brand as far ahead of BMW in reliability and initial quality.
What it boils down to is the fact that they paid so much for the car they believe that it should defy the laws of physics.
I was just saying that the guys here are the same type of guys over in the bimmer forums so they are probably whining and crying about nothing much like the guys here. So judging build quality based solely on forums is pointless. IMO
My suggestion is you take at least half of what you read here with a grain of salt as typical internet forum exageration. Like on any forum, the very car that was praised at time of purchase gets cursed shortly thereafter, by the very same driver. The more "up-market" the product, the greater the extremes are from praise to curse. Why?
1. Unrealistic expectations of the car to begin with. You will read so many times comments like, "a $60K+ car should/shouldn't do this or that." "M-B (or any other comparable brand) could have, would have, should have."
2. A never ending need to spout something on a forum for the sake of stating it, to provoke reaction, to be on the record to praise or bash a brand, to fill up dead internet space and the need to be recognized.
Review any of the brand specific forums and you will see similarities. Very comparable conflicting love/hate comments from a very similar cast of characters.
Please do your due diligence before you buy any brand, but not just on a brand specific forum with a limited number of enthusiat/participants (a very, very small sampling of owners). Test drive and compare and decide what is important to you in a car. But at the end of the day, no matter what you pick, it is still just a car.
Good luck with your search and hopefully you will be happy with what you choose!!
What it boils down to is the fact that they paid so much for the car they believe that it should defy the laws of physics.
I was just saying that the guys here are the same type of guys over in the bimmer forums so they are probably whining and crying about nothing much like the guys here. So judging build quality based solely on forums is pointless. IMO
If I were you I would research both cars and then drive them both. I have had four BMWs in the past and they were great cars. MB has been great also but most opinions here are biased and have limited value.
Last edited by petee1997; May 5, 2011 at 11:04 AM.
Thanks.
Al
Thanks.
Al

The F10 is far from a disaster, and since so many things are brand new on it, I'm sure it'll get ironed out, but it is a lot more fussy than the W212 is right now. Those things that you mentioned are very much common it seems, and I also started reading a lot of owners complaining about the exact same wind-noise coming in from the same area, and last I checked, none have been able to fix it.
In reality, the W212 better be less fussy, as its platform and gizmo's/drivetrain are far more tried and true, and ironed out by now, and in some cases, also less advanced. The 2012's can be a different story (in terms of drivetrain), possibly for the first couple years or so.
Last edited by K-A; May 5, 2011 at 07:34 PM.
It'll be interesting to see how well M-B's new engines fare.
The 7G will still be used though. I think a 9-Speed it in the works by 2014 U.S MY when the W222 S-Class hits.
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/WebX?14@@.f21ba34/0
So, how is 7 sp auto in E-class, The automatic downshifts acceleration is normally smooth and no transmission jerkiness at low speeds?
The e350 luxury with the 17 inch rims has a comfortable ride, feels like a smaller s class. I had one for a couple weeks before trading up to the e550(its a long story, but I felt that the extra $$ were worth it for the v8, leather seats and what I thought would be the better suspension). The luxury most certainly does not have a sporty ride but if you live in an area with crappy roads and are looking for a luxury sedan that does a good job of absorbing the road imperfections, it might be the way to go. I'm assuming that the m35 has a firm sporty feeling suspension, so going to an e350 luxury may seem to floaty for you. I would recommend that you very carefully test drive the sport and luxury models and decide which suspension fits your driving needs and wants. They are very differently tuned. While not perfect, these are very, very well made vehicles. For the record, I liked the e350 engine and tranny, did not find it underpowered and it responded when you stepped on it. Very torquey engine. Regards. Ned.
Last edited by ngerstman; May 5, 2011 at 08:22 PM.

The hardcore Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG isn't the only E-Class model that gets a new heart for the 2012 model year. According to our sources within Mercedes-Benz, both the E350 and E550 models will receive new powerplants currently found elsewhere in the automaker's lineup.
The base E350 will now be powered by the automaker's new 3.5-liter V6 with direct-injection, an engine that we recently tested in the C350 sedan and SLK350 roadster. Rated at 302 horsepower and 273 pound-feet of torque, the new engine provides power increases of 14 hp and 15 lb-ft over the current V6, while the use of direct-injection and a seven-speed automatic transmission will no doubt return improved fuel economy.
Moving along, the eight-cylinder E550 will ditch its naturally aspirated 5.5-liter V8 in favor of a twin-turbocharged 4.6-liter unit with direct-injection, currently found in the CL550 coupe. In the E-Class, this engine will be good for 402 hp and 443 lb-ft – improvements of 20 and 52, respectively.
Look for the refreshed E-Class range to debut this Fall.
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/05/2...n-v6-twin-tur/
Lessee now...302 minus 268...carry the one....divide by the DOW Industrials....buy a vowel.....er, I get a 34hp increase. Of course, I could be wrong.

But seriously, anyone care to opine on how much difference 15 lb. ft. more torque will make, if all else is the same, e.g. car weight, axle ratio, etc? IOW, should the car feel "quicker" or "livelier" than the current V6?
Al
More importantly, I wonder how its powerband will compare to the current one, how smooth it'll be, how long-term dependable with that crazy high compression, D/I, etc., and how good the MPG will be.
More importantly, I wonder how its powerband will compare to the current one, how smooth it'll be, how long-term dependable with that crazy high compression, D/I, etc., and how good the MPG will be.









