Being FLUSH is hard

What are your staggered sizes and net offsets (with or without spacers) ? Post pics please.
Thanks in advance.
Pete

I don't know if you consider this flush but this is the only picture I got right now with my car. Fronts are 20x8.5 and rear is 20x10. Lowered on coilovers (rear at lowest setting with full system in trunk). Rear sits perfectly with no rolling of the fenders or any other modification. Only thing I did was get stretched tires for front and rear.
I added a 10MM spacer to the front just to clear my amg brakes so it slightly rubs when I turn into a dip. Unfortunately I bought these rims used so offsets are unknown with a 2-3 degree camber on front and rear

Aren't the offsets usually stamped onto the back side of the wheel face? Or some wheel manuafacturers have a label.
Thanks for posting.
Pete
To be flush (or close to it) you need:
front - 30-33mm offsets for 8.5" wide wheels (regardless of diameter); if you use stock wheels (18x8.5 et48) adding 15mm spacers will get you to et33;
rear - 37-40mm offsets for 9.5" wide wheels (regardless of diameter) or 43-46mm for 10" wide; if you use stock wheels (18x9 et54) adding 20mm spacers will get you to et34, which is the same as et40 for 9.5" wide wheel.

To be flush (or close to it) you need:
front - 30-33mm offsets for 8.5" wide wheels (regardless of diameter); if you use stock wheels (18x8.5 et48) adding 15mm spacers will get you to et33;
rear - 37-40mm offsets for 9.5" wide wheels (regardless of diameter) or 43-46mm for 10" wide; if you use stock wheels (18x9 et54) adding 20mm spacers will get you to et34, which is the same as et40 for 9.5" wide wheel.
So 20x9 et34 and 20x10 et44 should be flush then.
Btw...anyone running 20s on oem stock suspension? how does that look?
Pete
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

r: 20x10 +42 / 285 25 20s - no rubbing at all. no fender mods.
car is lowered. the +40 in front on a 9 is extremely flush. backs have 1 or 2 mm wiggle room depending on tire size. i would not be able to run a 295s without rubbing.

r: 20x10 +42 / 285 25 20s - no rubbing at all. no fender mods.
car is lowered. the +40 in front on a 9 is extremely flush. backs have 1 or 2 mm wiggle room depending on tire size. i would not be able to run a 295s without rubbing.
Am getting 20x8.5 et32 with 235/35-20 tire - will be close to 100% flush upfront; and 20x9.5 et43 with 265/30-20 tire - once mounted will see how it looks at the rear (I know I need et37-38 with 265 to be flush, but 5mm spacer can not be used, so may try 10mm spacers).
Current setup, 19x8.5 et38 with 255/35-19 and 19x9.5 et43 with 285/30-19 are both flush front(almost, could use a 3mm spacer) and rear.
Last edited by threeMBs; Jan 21, 2012 at 11:08 AM.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/TireSe...earDiameter=20
but at $1,700+?
I went with now discontinued and very hard to find General Exclaim UHP (for the money great tires, but not for winter - used them on many different cars) - about $530 shipped: rears are available at sears.com ($115ea) very few left, fronts - at simpletire.com($125). Also available on ebay (very limited), but for more $$$.
235/275 are more readily available, including TTR (Kumho STP, e.g.). You can always do front/rear pairs matching.
WOW nvm i just checked, they dont having matching tires in that size, also checked another site and same thing.. thats a tough size I guess.
If you go up to 275/30 you have two different brands to choose from, im prob going with the Nankang 2 to keep cost down..
http://discounttires.com/list.php?si...earch=tiresize
Last edited by bigigg; Jan 22, 2012 at 07:37 AM.
2. I would never put uknown or less known brand of tires on any car in any size (especially with such a low profile). If I were you, I'd pass on Nankang, and if you're set on 235/275 (ah I see, you must since its a 4matic to keep diameter same/close) then I'd go with Kumho SPTs.






looking nice comigo

