E-Class (W212) 2010 - 2016: E 350, E 550

Tint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-21-2014, 08:23 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
shashivr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
Tint

Considering having my windows tinted when I have my paint protection done. However, I have the following questions:

1) How much light does the factory tint let in (as a %)?
2) Should I tint my windows or leave them stock? If stock,
2a) What % tint would you recommend on a white wagon?
3) Would you have your front windshield tinted with 80% tint to protect he interior further (mainly the dash)?
4) Anything else I should consider (type of tint, etc)?

BTW, I was quoted $350 for carbon tint all the way around (in 35%). Also, $200 for front windshield... also carbon tint (80%). Does that sound fair? I thought it was high.

Thanks!
Old 03-21-2014, 09:51 PM
  #2  
Member
 
ph350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
e350
It depends where you get the tint done and what brand you actually get. Ceramic tint is way more expensive but the benefits aren't really noticeable in the long run. Basically, it can match the performance of much darker but lower priced tints. Best thing to do is not spend too much money on tint as most are very similar in performance in real life. Try getting the tint for $350 including windshield.
Old 03-21-2014, 11:08 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
drsaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think it's high. I paid $76 with a groupon last week for a sedan.

The days of crappy purple changing tint are gone. Suntek, lumar, 3m.

All good tints in my opinion. Highest I saw in dc area was $225.

Mine is 50 front and 35 rear. If state law allows 35 is a good percentage that let's you still see decent at night. Pics attached.
Attached Thumbnails Tint-image-2691123272.jpg  

Last edited by drsaab; 03-22-2014 at 11:09 AM.
Old 03-21-2014, 11:42 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Mbenz260e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 594
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2021 S580 Prior: 2012 E350 Bluetec, 2013 GL350 Bluetec, 2009 ML320 Bluetec, 2006 E320 CDI, 1987 260E
Originally Posted by drsaab
I think it's high. I paid $76 with a groupon last week for a sedan.

The days of crappy purple changing tint are gone. Suntek, lumar, 3m.

All good tints in my opinion. Highest I saw in dc area was $225.

Mine is 50 front and 35 rear. If state law allows 35 is a good percentage that let's you still see decent at night. Pics attached.
Dr Saab can you share where you got your tints done and which brand? I want to get mine done but the shops I've stopped by in MoCo all seemed a bit sketch...
Old 03-21-2014, 11:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
drsaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Clayton radio. They have a new location in laurel md. The groupon was about 95 and there was a 20% off groupon promo. You can call the shop and prob bypass groupon. The girl who did it has been doing tint for 13 years. Been a week and I see no flaws so I am happy. Not some fancy place but they have wifi so take a laptop and chill for 2 hrs and it's done.
Old 03-22-2014, 12:00 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
I have a 2013 white wagon as well. I got Formula one ceramic 50% on all windows, 80% on windshield, and 5% on sunroof, total was $400. For those that think all tints are the same, go do a temp test. Ceramic tint blocks a lot more heat than regular dye based tint, and doesn't cause RF interference like metallic tint does.

Here's a few photos





Old 03-22-2014, 04:11 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
alanme123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Southern California, Orange County
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2012 E350
Mine was 320 for 5 windows for ceramic tint. The guy used winco tint and gives a real nice reflection that matches perfectly with my car. You can also significantly tell the difference of the heat too.
Old 03-22-2014, 07:40 AM
  #8  
Member
 
justdonating's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 79
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2014 E350 4MATIC, 2013 SL550
I had my E350 done a few weeks ago. The shop used LLumar 35. Not as dark as most people want, but fine for me. All four windows and the back was $180. My 2nd vehicle done in Llumar. I'm happy again.
Old 03-22-2014, 09:55 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
Mbenz260e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 594
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2021 S580 Prior: 2012 E350 Bluetec, 2013 GL350 Bluetec, 2009 ML320 Bluetec, 2006 E320 CDI, 1987 260E
Originally Posted by drsaab
Clayton radio. They have a new location in laurel md. The groupon was about 95 and there was a 20% off groupon promo. You can call the shop and prob bypass groupon. The girl who did it has been doing tint for 13 years. Been a week and I see no flaws so I am happy. Not some fancy place but they have wifi so take a laptop and chill for 2 hrs and it's done.
Great thanks for the info I will look them up.

I am one of the odd one's that will probably just go with 50% max.
Old 03-24-2014, 10:05 AM
  #10  
Member
 
ph350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
e350
Originally Posted by Mbenz260e
Great thanks for the info I will look them up.

I am one of the odd one's that will probably just go with 50% max.

If you do 50% max, then it won't be much different from stock because even factory tinted cars are darker than that. And it won't provide you any privacy nor deter from thieves looking into your car for something to steal. Also, at 50% the heat and glare reduction would be minimal. Go to a tint shop and look at the different tints and decide for yourself what you are comfortable with.

With ceramic, the performance in heat reduction is better, but the price also doubles or triples depending on whether you tint the front windsheild or not. I believe that the front windshield needs to be tinted to maximize the heat reduction.
Old 03-24-2014, 12:04 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Originally Posted by ph350
If you do 50% max, then it won't be much different from stock because even factory tinted cars are darker than that. And it won't provide you any privacy nor deter from thieves looking into your car for something to steal. Also, at 50% the heat and glare reduction would be minimal. Go to a tint shop and look at the different tints and decide for yourself what you are comfortable with.

With ceramic, the performance in heat reduction is better, but the price also doubles or triples depending on whether you tint the front windsheild or not. I believe that the front windshield needs to be tinted to maximize the heat reduction.
It depends a great deal on the interior color. In my E350 with black interior, 50% tint looks significantly darker than my C300 with tan interior with the exact same tint. on the C300, the 50% all around 80% windshield looks like there is just a hint of tinting there. on the E350 with all black interior, it looks very dark.
The tint does provide a significant reduction in heat and also blocks 99.9% UV so don't have to worry about interior fading/bubbling or getting skin cancer.

Don't also forget night time driving. Darker tint makes it harder to see outside the vehicle in the dark. My previous cars had 30% and 20% tint which I thought was way too dark for driving at night, so I went with 50% this time.
Old 03-24-2014, 03:27 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
steventnguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 e350 w212
I got suntek carbon xp on my car which is a little underrated then the ceramics. The price was very affordable. I paid $180 for all my windows except for my windshield. I got 35% in the rear and 50% in the front window. California laws say no tint at all in front.
Old 03-24-2014, 05:24 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
Mbenz260e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 594
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2021 S580 Prior: 2012 E350 Bluetec, 2013 GL350 Bluetec, 2009 ML320 Bluetec, 2006 E320 CDI, 1987 260E
Originally Posted by ph350
If you do 50% max, then it won't be much different from stock because even factory tinted cars are darker than that. And it won't provide you any privacy nor deter from thieves looking into your car for something to steal. Also, at 50% the heat and glare reduction would be minimal. Go to a tint shop and look at the different tints and decide for yourself what you are comfortable with.

With ceramic, the performance in heat reduction is better, but the price also doubles or triples depending on whether you tint the front windsheild or not. I believe that the front windshield needs to be tinted to maximize the heat reduction.
Thanks for the input! Still debating between 35-50% but I am not interested in privacy or looks, just want heat reduction and less UV hitting the seats etc.

Does anyone know what the factory tint his? I thought very minimal?
Old 03-24-2014, 05:37 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Factory glass typically lets through 70 to 80% light, thus if you get a 50% tint, you're effectively getting about 35 to 40% light through. a 35% tint would allow about 25 to 28% light through.
Old 03-24-2014, 06:35 PM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
shashivr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
My local tint dealer informed me this weekend that it doesn't matter whether it's 80% or 20% when it comes to heat reduction for ceramic tint. Do you guys buy this?
Old 03-24-2014, 06:44 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Originally Posted by shashivr4
My local tint dealer informed me this weekend that it doesn't matter whether it's 80% or 20% when it comes to heat reduction for ceramic tint. Do you guys buy this?
That's not true. While the difference is much smaller with ceramic tint, there is a difference, the darker you go, the more heat it will reject.

Take a look at this spec sheet for Formula One tint Formula One Spec

The Pinnacle series is their ceramic tint. Difference in heat rejection (2nd column) between 50% and 5% is 49% vs 65%. so there's a 16% difference in heat rejection between the lightest ceramic tint vs darkest.
Compare that to the classic series (dye based) which has a 21% difference in heat rejection going from 50% to 5% and the Comfort series (metallic) which has a whopping 30% difference in heat rejection going from 50% to 5% light transmission.

Even the Air series (ceramic 80% light transmission, nearly clear) blocks 43% heat, while the Classic 5 (dye based, 5% light transmission, nearly black) blocks only 47% heat.

So Ceramic tint does block significantly more heat than traditional dye or metallic tint. and going darker does block more heat, even for ceramic.
Old 03-24-2014, 06:57 PM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
shashivr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
Originally Posted by thenew3
That's not true. While the difference is much smaller with ceramic tint, there is a difference, the darker you go, the more heat it will reject.

Take a look at this spec sheet for Formula One tint Formula One Spec

The Pinnacle series is their ceramic tint. Difference in heat rejection (2nd column) between 50% and 5% is 49% vs 65%. so there's a 16% difference in heat rejection between the lightest ceramic tint vs darkest.
Compare that to the classic series (dye based) which has a 21% difference in heat rejection going from 50% to 5% and the Comfort series (metallic) which has a whopping 30% difference in heat rejection going from 50% to 5% light transmission.

Even the Air series (ceramic 80% light transmission, nearly clear) blocks 43% heat, while the Classic 5 (dye based, 5% light transmission, nearly black) blocks only 47% heat.

So Ceramic tint does block significantly more heat than traditional dye or metallic tint. and going darker does block more heat, even for ceramic.
Thanks for the thorough response! Do you happen to have the specs for Suntek film?
Old 03-24-2014, 06:59 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Originally Posted by shashivr4
Thanks for the thorough response! Do you happen to have the specs for Suntek film?
Here you go

http://www.suntekfilms.com/files/Sun...-specsheet.pdf
Old 03-24-2014, 07:34 PM
  #19  
Member
Thread Starter
 
shashivr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
Originally Posted by thenew3
Thanks! BTW, how do you like the 5% on your sunroof?
Old 03-24-2014, 07:39 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Originally Posted by shashivr4
Thanks! BTW, how do you like the 5% on your sunroof?
It's nice, lets in just enough light during the day, and very little heat.
Old 04-03-2014, 09:14 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thefisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 3,106
Received 384 Likes on 314 Posts
2011 E550 P2 4M Sedan
Looking at getting Llumar CTX 30 ceramic tint all the way around. MB dealer wants $300 for all windows. Found the shop they use and can get it for $250 direct. Llumar ATR metallic is less expensive ($100 less) but I am interested to try the ceramic for the greater heat reduction about 10% more in relative solar energy reduction according to stats.

Also thinking about windshield with near clear Llumar Air 80 for more heat reduction. That is another $80 from same dealer.

Llumar seems to be most prevalent in my area. Nearest Hubert Optick dealer is an hour away. There is a 3M dealer but they wanted $800 for Crystalline. I had Llumar metallic 35 on my last car from 8 years ago. It worked well but would like a little less heat. Never did that windshield on that one and your legs can get pretty hot midday in Florida.

Last edited by thefisch; 04-03-2014 at 09:22 PM.
Old 04-03-2014, 09:58 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
stale-bread's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2010 E550
I'm looking to tint my front winshield due to feeling the heat on my arms and chest in the summer months. Sides and rear tint are already done. From this post I'm assuming I should go with ceramic. I'm unsure how many inches it can go from the top of the windscreen in Massachusetts. Heat reduction is the goal. Thoughts?
Old 04-03-2014, 10:24 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thefisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 3,106
Received 384 Likes on 314 Posts
2011 E550 P2 4M Sedan
if you google tint laws you can find charts that show each state. If front tint is legal in Mass it may only be the first 5-6 inches. local tint shops will know how far it can go and how dark is legal.

I an thinking about tinting my entire windshield which is not legal in FL. But I won't be the first person with it.
Old 04-06-2014, 05:59 AM
  #24  
Member
 
lightfytr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2011 E350 Sport
Originally Posted by stale-bread
I'm looking to tint my front winshield due to feeling the heat on my arms and chest in the summer months. Sides and rear tint are already done. From this post I'm assuming I should go with ceramic. I'm unsure how many inches it can go from the top of the windscreen in Massachusetts. Heat reduction is the goal. Thoughts?
Windshield was the best decision for me. I went with Suntek 50%, Its great, I have Llumar 35% on the rest of the car. The difference is night and day, the heat on your hands/arms/body is gone. Also, it feels like I have a sun guard on the windshield when I come back in my car after being in my office all day. I thought it might be too dark and I was hesitant, but when driving I dont even notice it, you can see the difference if you put the side windows down but I dont feel like my safety is compromised at all.
Old 04-06-2014, 08:50 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thefisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 3,106
Received 384 Likes on 314 Posts
2011 E550 P2 4M Sedan
Originally Posted by lightfytr
Windshield was the best decision for me. I went with Suntek 50%, Its great, I have Llumar 35% on the rest of the car. The difference is night and day, the heat on your hands/arms/body is gone. Also, it feels like I have a sun guard on the windshield when I come back in my car after being in my office all day. I thought it might be too dark and I was hesitant, but when driving I dont even notice it, you can see the difference if you put the side windows down but I dont feel like my safety is compromised at all.
Just curious based on your experience. Is the suntek or llumar tint you have metallic or ceramic? Do you see any rainbow effect when driving depending on the angle of light?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Tint



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.