Tint
1) How much light does the factory tint let in (as a %)?
2) Should I tint my windows or leave them stock? If stock,
2a) What % tint would you recommend on a white wagon?
3) Would you have your front windshield tinted with 80% tint to protect he interior further (mainly the dash)?
4) Anything else I should consider (type of tint, etc)?
BTW, I was quoted $350 for carbon tint all the way around (in 35%). Also, $200 for front windshield... also carbon tint (80%). Does that sound fair? I thought it was high.
Thanks!
The days of crappy purple changing tint are gone. Suntek, lumar, 3m.
All good tints in my opinion. Highest I saw in dc area was $225.
Mine is 50 front and 35 rear. If state law allows 35 is a good percentage that let's you still see decent at night. Pics attached.
Last edited by drsaab; Mar 22, 2014 at 11:09 AM.



The days of crappy purple changing tint are gone. Suntek, lumar, 3m.
All good tints in my opinion. Highest I saw in dc area was $225.
Mine is 50 front and 35 rear. If state law allows 35 is a good percentage that let's you still see decent at night. Pics attached.
Here's a few photos





Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG



I am one of the odd one's that will probably just go with 50% max.
If you do 50% max, then it won't be much different from stock because even factory tinted cars are darker than that. And it won't provide you any privacy nor deter from thieves looking into your car for something to steal. Also, at 50% the heat and glare reduction would be minimal. Go to a tint shop and look at the different tints and decide for yourself what you are comfortable with.
With ceramic, the performance in heat reduction is better, but the price also doubles or triples depending on whether you tint the front windsheild or not. I believe that the front windshield needs to be tinted to maximize the heat reduction.
With ceramic, the performance in heat reduction is better, but the price also doubles or triples depending on whether you tint the front windsheild or not. I believe that the front windshield needs to be tinted to maximize the heat reduction.
The tint does provide a significant reduction in heat and also blocks 99.9% UV so don't have to worry about interior fading/bubbling or getting skin cancer.
Don't also forget night time driving. Darker tint makes it harder to see outside the vehicle in the dark. My previous cars had 30% and 20% tint which I thought was way too dark for driving at night, so I went with 50% this time.



With ceramic, the performance in heat reduction is better, but the price also doubles or triples depending on whether you tint the front windsheild or not. I believe that the front windshield needs to be tinted to maximize the heat reduction.
Does anyone know what the factory tint his? I thought very minimal?
Take a look at this spec sheet for Formula One tint Formula One Spec
The Pinnacle series is their ceramic tint. Difference in heat rejection (2nd column) between 50% and 5% is 49% vs 65%. so there's a 16% difference in heat rejection between the lightest ceramic tint vs darkest.
Compare that to the classic series (dye based) which has a 21% difference in heat rejection going from 50% to 5% and the Comfort series (metallic) which has a whopping 30% difference in heat rejection going from 50% to 5% light transmission.
Even the Air series (ceramic 80% light transmission, nearly clear) blocks 43% heat, while the Classic 5 (dye based, 5% light transmission, nearly black) blocks only 47% heat.
So Ceramic tint does block significantly more heat than traditional dye or metallic tint. and going darker does block more heat, even for ceramic.
Take a look at this spec sheet for Formula One tint Formula One Spec
The Pinnacle series is their ceramic tint. Difference in heat rejection (2nd column) between 50% and 5% is 49% vs 65%. so there's a 16% difference in heat rejection between the lightest ceramic tint vs darkest.
Compare that to the classic series (dye based) which has a 21% difference in heat rejection going from 50% to 5% and the Comfort series (metallic) which has a whopping 30% difference in heat rejection going from 50% to 5% light transmission.
Even the Air series (ceramic 80% light transmission, nearly clear) blocks 43% heat, while the Classic 5 (dye based, 5% light transmission, nearly black) blocks only 47% heat.
So Ceramic tint does block significantly more heat than traditional dye or metallic tint. and going darker does block more heat, even for ceramic.




Also thinking about windshield with near clear Llumar Air 80 for more heat reduction. That is another $80 from same dealer.
Llumar seems to be most prevalent in my area. Nearest Hubert Optick dealer is an hour away. There is a 3M dealer but they wanted $800 for Crystalline. I had Llumar metallic 35 on my last car from 8 years ago. It worked well but would like a little less heat. Never did that windshield on that one and your legs can get pretty hot midday in Florida.
Last edited by thefisch; Apr 3, 2014 at 09:22 PM.




I an thinking about tinting my entire windshield which is not legal in FL. But I won't be the first person with it.






