Why The 2014 Facelift Ruined The W212 (Opinion)
in 2009, I was thrilled by the new looks the E class was given upon its reveal. It had sharp styling for both the Luxury line & the Sport line. Another thing that I loved about the 2010-2013 W212 was how it was different from both the C & S class, with the double headlights and taillights that extended into the trunk.
Then comes the 2014 facelift. The Sport line to me looks like its trying to be something it really isn't, and that's a sports car.
Overall, the sport's changes I can deal with, the luxury however suffered the worst in my opinion, That strange looking grill with an oversized chrome outline tells me that when this look was under development it was rushed out.
The rear of the 2014 luxury is plain and boring to me. Its biggest offense is that it has no rear exhaust tips, something the 2010 had standard here in the U.S.
Another problem is the new headlights. They look very generic without the Full LED package
Well, thats my thoughts. I wonder what other opinions people have on this.
Last edited by jaworks3d; Dec 6, 2015 at 10:46 AM.
if MB is doing the same sausage different length tactic, I might as well go for the best one,
given how the W213 would look, my next car will be a S class.
in 2009, I was thrilled by the new looks the E class was given upon its reveal. It had sharp styling for both the Luxury line & the Sport line. Another thing that I loved about the 2010-2013 W212 was how it was different from both the C & S class, with the double headlights and taillights that extended into the trunk.
Then comes the 2014 facelift. The Sport line to me looks like its trying to be something it really isn't, and that's a sports car.
Overall, the sport's changes I can deal with, the luxury however suffered the worst in my opinion, That strange looking grill with an oversized chrome outline tells me that when this look was under development it was rushed out.
The rear of the 2014 luxury is plain and boring to me. Its biggest offense is that it has no rear exhaust tips, something the 2010 had standard here in the U.S.
Another problem is the new headlights. They look very generic without the Full LED package
Well, thats my thoughts. I wonder what other opinions people have on this.
Your driving an old mans car dude
in 2009, I was thrilled by the new looks the E class was given upon its reveal. It had sharp styling for both the Luxury line & the Sport line. Another thing that I loved about the 2010-2013 W212 was how it was different from both the C & S class, with the double headlights and taillights that extended into the trunk.
Then comes the 2014 facelift. The Sport line to me looks like its trying to be something it really isn't, and that's a sports car.
Overall, the sport's changes I can deal with, the luxury however suffered the worst in my opinion, That strange looking grill with an oversized chrome outline tells me that when this look was under development it was rushed out.
The rear of the 2014 luxury is plain and boring to me. Its biggest offense is that it has no rear exhaust tips, something the 2010 had standard here in the U.S.
Another problem is the new headlights. They look very generic without the Full LED package
Well, thats my thoughts. I wonder what other opinions people have on this.
It is very easy for me, at least, to recognize from a block away an oncoming 2014+ E Class with LED package. To me that's a sign of a very distinctive front end, even more so than its predecessor. Where I live, the vast majority (over 95%) of 2014+ E Class are equipped with the full LED light package. I gather that this might not be the case in the US market.
These LED lights not only look fantastic, they function very well. At night, the turning function of the lights is especially effective in very dark situations. The front and rear LED turn signals and brake lights are notable for being so very bright and visible. They are a definite improvement over the pre-2014 lights.
Having previously owned a 2013 E350BT with bi-zenons, I can assure you that the 2015 LEDs offer a significant upgrade in overall lighting effectiveness.
Last edited by DerekACS; Dec 6, 2015 at 04:31 AM.




Biggest complaint I have is the huge, non-functional, cheap plastic, dirt catching, fake intakes on lower ends of front end. Totally destroys the look of the car.
I think it was a mistake for MB to remove the "E" class distinctive quad headlight set-up. Now MB's look the same from CLA to "S" to AMG.
Trending Topics
Last edited by jaworks3d; Dec 6, 2015 at 10:44 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I dig my 2011 550 due to the angular lines, hockey stick DRL's and the edgy profile. I think the facelift models have a more refined design and have smoothed much of the edginess of the original design. That said, I really dig the 17 redesign and will be sitting tight until the new AMG models come out. IMO the biggest disappointment in the facelift was the loss of the V8. Huge mistake IMO and I won't own another MB without a V8 so forced to the AMG models or the S class model if I still want 4 doors with practical room.
It is very easy for me, at least, to recognize from a block away an oncoming 2014+ E Class with LED package. To me that's a sign of a very distinctive front end, even more so than its predecessor. Where I live, the vast majority (over 95%) of 2014+ E Class are equipped with the full LED light package. I gather that this might not be the case in the US market.
These LED lights not only look fantastic, they function very well. At night, the turning function of the lights is especially effective in very dark situations. The front and rear LED turn signals and brake lights are notable for being so very bright and visible. They are a definite improvement over the pre-2014 lights.
Having previously owned a 2013 E350BT with bi-zenons, I can assure you that the 2015 LEDs offer a significant upgrade in overall lighting effectiveness.
I really like the quad headlamp look on many other cars than just Mercedes. Like my XJR, it's a unique design that's fading away unfortunately. but of course, styles come and go.
Last edited by jaworks3d; Dec 6, 2015 at 11:08 AM.




It is very easy for me, at least, to recognize from a block away an oncoming 2014+ E Class with LED package. To me that's a sign of a very distinctive front end, even more so than its predecessor. Where I live, the vast majority (over 95%) of 2014+ E Class are equipped with the full LED light package. I gather that this might not be the case in the US market.
These LED lights not only look fantastic, they function very well. At night, the turning function of the lights is especially effective in very dark situations. The front and rear LED turn signals and brake lights are notable for being so very bright and visible. They are a definite improvement over the pre-2014 lights.
Having previously owned a 2013 E350BT with bi-zenons, I can assure you that the 2015 LEDs offer a signifycant upgrade in overall lighting effectiveness.
The new E-class will probably look much like the S and C class now do. The new C-class looks so similar to the new S-class it is difficult to separate them from the distance. I bet the E-class will have exactly the same look so MB is going to the same direction as BMW, i.e. the cars look the same outside but are just different in size.
What comes to the lighting I doubt the new LED's are so significantly brighter than the lights in the Bi-xenon package...
The front end of the current E-class looks stupid. It is like a space ship with those "ion engine" intakes at the low corners. The glassy look is gone. I hope thy have a new front for the new E-class.
I really like the quad headlamp look on many other cars than just Mercedes. Like my XJR, it's a unique design that's fading away unfortunately. but of course, styles come and go.
Biggest complaint I have is the huge, non-functional, cheap plastic, dirt catching, fake intakes on lower ends of front end. Totally destroys the look of the car.
I think it was a mistake for MB to remove the "E" class distinctive quad headlight set-up. Now MB's look the same from CLA to "S" to AMG.
On the facelift interior, I really like...
* Turn signal stalk and cruise are reversed with turn signal on top
* The horizontal row of silver buttons for the ventilated / heated front seats, rear head-rests, rear windshield sunscreen, etc.
* No more silly analog clock in the dash gauge cluster taking up precious real estate (and I won't even go into detail on how annoying I find the minute hand's movement, argh). It's been moved to the top of the center stack.
Whatever floats your boat.
I do agree (and am upset) that the upcoming E class W213 will lose its unique styling.
Other than that, I don't dislike the new design either.
FWIW.




Yup, Great auto all around. Solid, fairly roomy inside, will go forever with proper maintenance. Have always wanted one to play with.... get a mint 6 cylinder with low miles which is very doable here in Florida and turn it in a sleeper

maybe when i retire and actually have time....
Mike




which kinda sucked because i started with a 50k budget and finding 2012/2013 e550 cabs with low mileage for under 50k was very doable...
Once we settled on 2014+ it blew the budget and there are a lot less of these models to pick from used.... in the end I bought new to get the colors/options etc that we wanted...
so much for my budget!!!

But wow what a auto, we just love it, comfortable, stylish and a great exhaust rumble, not too loud, not too quiet....
Mike




Resale value on every vehicle goes down as soon as you drive it off the lot. Model changes do affect resale value, but probably not that much. Sometimes, the value may be increased if people do not like the "new" version.

The Pre-FL is a much classier look. I like the hood star and the 4 headlights. I like the deeper creases in the hood. It can look a bit dated these days.
The post-FL is sportier. I really liked it when it first came out, but now I find it a a bit bland, even on my 63. Now that the W205 C looks so similar it is harder to discriminate the two. The E hood is now nearly flat, (I like how C63 hoods had/has bulges and think all AMG hoods should have these). The grille star is a better way to integrate distronic, and definitely looks better on coupes and sporty models. I think the E is just better suited for a more stately look with a traditional grille and hood-star.
For some reason I don't like the post-FL luxury E styling. It is a distant third behind the post-FL sport and Pre-FL body.
Perfect example: when I bought my XJR my friends laughed at it and called it an "old man" car, today its been transformed into a 520 horsepower, 610 lb. ft. torque raging feline with many exterior and interior upgrades. Just shows how small to moderate changes can make a big difference on how a car is first interpreted.


