E350 4matic Wagon buying advice needed
The rear cargo area folds flat enough (for us). With ease I was able to transport a large desk as well as a chest of drawers three states away.
It's Palladium silver with grey leather and the standard 17" rims. My E430 4Matic had low profile wheels standard. I absolutely hated the harsh ride and all the flat tires. I'm a life long Mercedes Benz driver and this is one of the best I've ever owned!
Go to MBUSA's CPO site and find one certified pre-owned with 17" wheels.
The 3rd row folds flat, the 2nd row folds almost flat.
I've moved lots of stuff with the wagon including baby cribs, dressers, sofas etc.
The interior space is the same or slightly larger than the R class and ML/GLE class.
Even with a full load, I can get 31mpg on long highway trips if I keep my speeds below about 70mph. at 75mph, I get 28 to 29 mpg. Pretty impressive for a large, heavy, 4WD vehicle.
One thing I do not like (and this is not the just the E class) is the extremely low front fender lip that many modern vehicles have. I know this is to improve looks and aero dynamics to improve efficiency but it also makes them very prone to damage from parking bump stops and even occasionally just turning onto streets that have dips in them for drainage. I've seen so many E classes (and other types of vehicles) with badly scratched/damaged lower front fender lips.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Last edited by E430_4MATIC; Oct 28, 2016 at 07:04 AM.
I purchased a CPO 2014 E350 wagon with 36k miles in SoCal for $37k two weeks ago. Local CA car, white with chestnut brown leather, sport package, well optioned. Impressed with the quality so far. Interior is top notch.
I searched the entire western US for the color combo and options I wanted. Flew down to LA to pick it up. Drove it back home 400 miles without a hiccup.
I was looking for the CPO warranty, one owner Carfax and a CA car.
At first, took some adjusting to 9 year difference in model but now after 18 months and 12,000 miles I love it. Just had B3 service. Seats fold flat enough for anything we have needed and 2nd car was a 2010 GLK which believe it or not we traded in for a new Subaru Outback. Not crazy about all the new small MB SUV's they seem cheap and tinny and plasticky and we couldn't get a good enough deal IMO. For what we were going to have to pay for a CPO with much higher miles than we were comfortable with he decided to get the Outback as his dad and brother-zone-law in Seattle are recent buyers. We don't love it like our GLK but can't beat the price and what you get for the money. If they still made comparable small SUV we'd have gotten one as we have driven MB's for 30 years.
Sorry for diverting from the wagon. I have 17 tires and ride is smooth. I agree about the low front and wish there was front camera or alert as I have hooked mine a few times or else park too far back and then have to get back in car and pull forward.
Mine is white with black leather and details in signature although I need to update mileage. I have grown comfortable in the car and love driving it. It is a beautiful and elegant vehicle that I plan to keep long-term as we do with all our cars. Highly recommend.
Last edited by balthus; Oct 31, 2016 at 09:07 AM. Reason: Typo
The W210 is, IMHO, a better wagon if you like comfort. The compliance of the car is amazing. Very quiet, smoother than butter and like your Sienna if it's center of gravity was much lower, the tie rod ends weren't made of cannoli noodles and it were a half ton lighter. Interior wise, 4 people and 2 dogs would not have a preference of either vehicle. For kids the Mercedes Wagon actually works a little better because of the novelty of the rear facing seats. Their noise goes in the other direction, which is nice.
The interior on the W210 is of softer materials and has held up extremely well on our 2002 example with 29,000 miles. The W212 is somewhere along a line between the W210 and a current high end Mazda. I also like that the older wagon can be had with 2wd.
The new car is a lot sportier. The new engine is a significant improvement over the older car's V6. IMHO the older engine, although award winning in its day was severely compromised by being a cut down 90 degree V6. The new engine is a proper 60 degree V6 is a more even firing order, tons more responsive and about 25% more efficient.The old engine does fine, has plenty of power, but the new engine (since 2012) is a worthwhile improvement. Also, the new 722.9 transmission might be a little more finiky than the older transmission, but it improved as much as the engine.
The technology in the newer cars (2012 and up) is light years ahead of my 2002.
IMHO (and my newer car was Mercedes CPO) the CPO thing isn't worth the money. If you can get it for the market price of other cars, go for it. However, not worth an extra $4,000 like some people are paying. These cars are very straightforward to work on ... nothing to be afraid of and dealers somehow get paid silly money to work on them.
As for your Sienna ... drove the newer XLE for 200 miles. Got a couple of MPG worse than the wagons and did not enjoy the thing at all. The handling is terrible, it looks awful and the interior of my kids' Power Wheels is made of the same stuff. I've always thought Toyota's tag line should be "cars for people who really hate cars."
In contrast, every time I sit in the old W210 I can not help saying, "I love this thing." The 2013 is better looking (IMHO) goes faster and handles like a late 80's 944. Not quite in love, but I like it a lot.
Although the ride is on the firm side, it's never uncomfortable.
I suggest looking at left over 2016 inventory. You will be surprised at the discount a dealer may offer to take them off their lot. Without much negotiation I was able to get more than 10k off msrp.
Good luck with the hunt!
Here are some pics.
Yesterday I picked up a grandfather clock one state away and today we drive 3 states away to pick up a rescue beagle.
Our S212 is pure joy! I always feel a connection other S212 drivers when I see them on the road.
Last edited by E430_4MATIC; Nov 2, 2016 at 05:01 AM.







