Battery recall for '22-'23 - Class action?




Within 2 years from manufacturing MB is coming with this recall that alters significantly the most important performance specifications that were considered in purchasing this vehicle.
What are the opinions of other owners about this?
Are there any law profession owners that can weigh in and advise whether a legal action can force MB to buy back or to offer some compensation considering this gross misrepresentation?
This software update will not impact the charging time when using AC charging (i.e., home wallbox or public AC charging stations), nor will it impact your vehicle's acceleration, rated power output, or energy consumption. The software update will gradually reduce the vehicle's driving range as the vehicle mileage accumulates over time (e.g., the possible driving range reduction is calculated as 5% from approximately 31,000 mi, 8% from approximately 62,000 mi, and 11% from approximately 100,000 mi). Moreover, the software update might impact the charging time when using DC fast charging stations (1).
(1) For example: If the vehicle were to charge at a 100 kW DC fast charging station from 10-80% SOC, the charging time may increase by 10 to 15 minutes, depending on the vehicle's mileage and battery condition. Please note that, as stated in your owner's manual, a variety of factors might also affect the range and charging.
Last edited by cadetdrivr; May 29, 2025 at 05:34 PM.




Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
But the car is starting to feel sluggish in reverse, just like it did before the rear motor failed. Maybe if I have another rear motor failure and it is in the shop another 3 weeks, Mercedes will finally agree to buy it back.
I did find out that when these highly-depreciated EVs come back on lease, MB will auction them to recover whatever they can.




Software update was not performed. Service invoice stated "Update not performed. Customer will return when software is more stable."
And the A/C noise was documented in a tech bulletin where it indicated that debris could get into blower motor. So had to disassemble blower motor housing, clean out and install two gaskets to prevent leaves and other debris from getting into fan housing.
But after reading that some of you have successfully had the update installed, very weird to hear "...when software more stable." Service Advisor had nothing to say other than that the software was not stable.
Yet another adventure in EQB300 land, as I've indicated... the worst car I've ever had. Oh, and lease is $14-15K under water so no point in getting out of lease early and rolling that much negative equity into another lease.




Software update was not performed. Service invoice stated "Update not performed. Customer will return when software is more stable."
And the A/C noise was documented in a tech bulletin where it indicated that debris could get into blower motor. So had to disassemble blower motor housing, clean out and install two gaskets to prevent leaves and other debris from getting into fan housing.
But after reading that some of you have successfully had the update installed, very weird to hear "...when software more stable." Service Advisor had nothing to say other than that the software was not stable.
Yet another adventure in EQB300 land, as I've indicated... the worst car I've ever had. Oh, and lease is $14-15K under water so no point in getting out of lease early and rolling that much negative equity into another lease.
Charging from 50% hit 65kwh. It's about right I think. I usually only get 100 kWh when it's around 20%.
Maybe MB realizes that this fix is inappropriate and is looking for another solution?













