EQS Videos
The following 3 users liked this post by c4004matic:
#178
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Yours to Discover
Posts: 13,922
Received 2,655 Likes
on
2,258 Posts
PFL205.064 with M276.823 (Oil pump solenoid defeated)
Not sure if this was shared here yet but I am posting it here incase someone is interested in this video on a "somewhat" different take/review of the EQS.
Last edited by W205C43PFL; 01-12-2022 at 08:39 PM. Reason: Rephrase sentence
#179
MBWorld Fanatic!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVL9GZLhb1s
Not sure if this was shared here yet but I am posting it here incase someone is interested in this video on a "somewhat" different take/review of the EQS.
Not sure if this was shared here yet but I am posting it here incase someone is interested in this video on a "somewhat" different take/review of the EQS.
#180
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,300
Received 1,025 Likes
on
743 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
Some of the comments these dudes are making are idiotic. For example, they have not clue why it doesn't have the soft closing doors. I've watched many video reviews of the EQS580 and not one has stated that it doesn't drive with confidence. I think these guys are full of you know what for the most part.
#182
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Yours to Discover
Posts: 13,922
Received 2,655 Likes
on
2,258 Posts
PFL205.064 with M276.823 (Oil pump solenoid defeated)
For those who complained about braking confidence, it seems that the 53 model addressed it beautifully.
Last edited by W205C43PFL; 01-12-2022 at 09:57 PM.
#183
MBWorld Fanatic!
The eqs handles better than the S. That has been proven multiple times on the track. And noone has ever accused the S of anything but great handling... for its size. Yes its big and soft but it handles like a destroyer not an aircraft carrier. Furthermore Im sick of hearing the brake BS, given it brakes shorter than an s class too! In fact it is dynamically superior to the S class in every single criterion faster, better handling and better braking, Cant fool the numbers. Finally yes the rear is more cramped than an S class, so what? How many people carry NBA players in the rear seat on a regular basis? The average height for men is 70 inches and for women its 65. Anyone 6 ft or shorter has ample headroom. In the front, thats increased to 6'2".
Finally if you want to compare rear luxury, get a pinnacle model which has the fancier rear, DUH.
Finally if you want to compare rear luxury, get a pinnacle model which has the fancier rear, DUH.
The following users liked this post:
AppleFan1 (01-13-2022)
#184
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Yours to Discover
Posts: 13,922
Received 2,655 Likes
on
2,258 Posts
PFL205.064 with M276.823 (Oil pump solenoid defeated)
The eqs handles better than the S. That has been proven multiple times on the track. And noone has ever accused the S of anything but great handling... for its size. Yes its big and soft but it handles like a destroyer not an aircraft carrier. Furthermore Im sick of hearing the brake BS, given it brakes shorter than an s class too! In fact it is dynamically superior to the S class in every single criterion faster, better handling and better braking, Cant fool the numbers. Finally yes the rear is more cramped than an S class, so what? How many people carry NBA players in the rear seat on a regular basis? The average height for men is 70 inches and for women its 65. Anyone 6 ft or shorter has ample headroom. In the front, thats increased to 6'2".
Finally if you want to compare rear luxury, get a pinnacle model which has the fancier rear, DUH.
Finally if you want to compare rear luxury, get a pinnacle model which has the fancier rear, DUH.
Yes, it isn't fair to compare the luxury of a regular S-Class and the EQS without the Executive Rear Seating Package offered on the Executive Line for the S and Pinnacle trim for the EQS.
The following users liked this post:
MBNUT1 (01-13-2022)
#187
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 6,383
Received 297 Likes
on
249 Posts
223.168 & 213.012 & 906.633 & 214.005
Here is an excellent review from someone that's knowledgeable. It's also much more current than the video I posted above.
https://youtu.be/TuZ2MEU68I0
https://youtu.be/TuZ2MEU68I0
#188
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,300
Received 1,025 Likes
on
743 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
I think (just my opinion) they are complaining about the brakes in terms of the feel of it (so mainly the brake pedals and vehicle's overall response when the brake pedal is depressed and depending on the amount applied), not the actual performance of it as the performance itself is not bad like you said. That being said, it was all solved on the 53 model and I don't think anyone needs to complain anymore. All in all, brake feel is all personal preference to be honest (in my opinion).
Yes, it isn't fair to compare the luxury of a regular S-Class and the EQS without the Executive Rear Seating Package offered on the Executive Line for the S and Pinnacle trim for the EQS.
Yes, it isn't fair to compare the luxury of a regular S-Class and the EQS without the Executive Rear Seating Package offered on the Executive Line for the S and Pinnacle trim for the EQS.
#189
MBWorld Fanatic!
At some point he mentions the EQS has no heat pump. Is that a mistake or are the US-market EQS cars differently equipped from those for Europe? I could understand this for California or Florida but there are areas and time of year that the heat pump would be needed in the US too.
The following users liked this post:
kp117 (01-14-2022)
#190
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Yours to Discover
Posts: 13,922
Received 2,655 Likes
on
2,258 Posts
PFL205.064 with M276.823 (Oil pump solenoid defeated)
Sharing a random video (posting in the EQS section because a huge chunk talked about the EQS's Hyperscreen and MBUX despite the thumbnail is a W223)
Last edited by W205C43PFL; 04-07-2022 at 10:47 PM.