AppleFan1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateFeb 2014
- LocationIowa
- Posts:1,938
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2025 EQS580
-
Likes:889
-
Liked:396 Times in 271 Posts
In race for efficient EVs, Mercedes taps F1 team to keep up with Tesla
How do I turn this into a link? It’s a very interesting article from CNBC.
How do I turn this into a link? It’s a very interesting article from CNBC.
MBNUT1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateOct 2002
- LocationCincinnati
- Posts:4,976
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2010 E350 4Matic
-
Likes:4,825
-
Liked:1,345 Times in 964 Posts
https://www.reuters.com/business/aut...la-2023-05-02/
Interview with Mercedes F1 principal Toto Wolff on Mercedes EV program here
Interview starts at 2:23
Interview with Mercedes F1 principal Toto Wolff on Mercedes EV program here
Interview starts at 2:23
AppleFan1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateFeb 2014
- LocationIowa
- Posts:1,938
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2025 EQS580
-
Likes:889
-
Liked:396 Times in 271 Posts
Quote:
Interview with Mercedes F1 principal Toto Wolff on Mercedes EV program here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRiZ0thrN5A
Interview starts at 2:23
Thank you so much. Can you explain to me how you did this? Is it because this is from another source? I couldn’t get a link through CNBC. Originally Posted by MBNUT1
https://www.reuters.com/business/aut...la-2023-05-02/Interview with Mercedes F1 principal Toto Wolff on Mercedes EV program here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRiZ0thrN5A
Interview starts at 2:23
MBNUT1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateOct 2002
- LocationCincinnati
- Posts:4,976
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2010 E350 4Matic
-
Likes:4,825
-
Liked:1,345 Times in 964 Posts
I just googled your sentence and copied and pasted the link
That article bodes the question, why wasn’t Mercedes going for all this high efficiency from the beginning of the EQ concept? It also discusses a more aerodynamic design in future models. I thought the EQ was as aerodynamic as possible or will future cars all look like F1 racers? 😊
Also from last week, MotoMan meets up with Christoph Starzynski, formerly the Head of Development for @MercedesBenz EQ electric vehicles, he is now the Head of all Mercedes Benz passenger car development:
Quote:
F1's aerodynamic priorities are different. They want maximum downforce, so their Cd values are typically much higher than our cars.Originally Posted by Utopia Texas
That article bodes the question, why wasn’t Mercedes going for all this high efficiency from the beginning of the EQ concept? It also discusses a more aerodynamic design in future models. I thought the EQ was as aerodynamic as possible or will future cars all look like F1 racers? 😊
Probably one area that the F1 tech not too applicable to EQ cars.
Junior Member
Can MB just produce EVs that work first, then get in the race for catching up to Tesla?
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
ExploreAppleFan1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateFeb 2014
- LocationIowa
- Posts:1,938
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2025 EQS580
-
Likes:889
-
Liked:396 Times in 271 Posts
Quote:
I’m sure you will have plenty of people that will buy your “lemon.” All you need to do is tow it to the dealer and they will fix it. “Patience ***, patience said the master to the donkey.” Originally Posted by vhooloo
Can MB just produce EVs that work first, then get in the race for catching up to Tesla?
Quote:
Catching up to Tesla? What is there to "catch up"?Originally Posted by vhooloo
Can MB just produce EVs that work first, then get in the race for catching up to Tesla?
Quote:
Efficiency! MB is way behind Tesla and lucid. Originally Posted by nosnoop
Catching up to Tesla? What is there to "catch up"?
Quote:
It's easy to achieve efficiency like Tesla ignoring refinement, noise, luxury, vibration and comfort.Originally Posted by Tjdehya
Efficiency! MB is way behind Tesla and lucid.
Achieving noise isolation and refinement takes a lot of weight, there is no way around physics. In addition, I mean Tesla didn't even bother to put in decent equipment like an instrument panel, HUD, proper rain sensor, ultrasonic sensors, radar, front camera (and the list goes on...) for their Model 3/Y
With increased weight from higher level of luxury, equipment and refinement, you will inevitably reduce efficiency.
Just like I don't buy ICE car based on best fuel consumption, most EV buyers won't consider efficiency as deal breakers as long as it is decent; range is much more important.
Quote:
Guess what… the better the efficiency the better the range… go figure!Originally Posted by nosnoop
range is much more important.
Junior Member
Quote:
MB should focus on quality first, then quantity. Right now it seems they have neither quality nor quantity....Originally Posted by AppleFan1
I’m sure you will have plenty of people that will buy your “lemon.” All you need to do is tow it to the dealer and they will fix it. “Patience ***, patience said the master to the donkey.”
Quote:
Only for the same size battery.Originally Posted by Tjdehya
Guess what… the better the efficiency the better the range… go figure!
I won't care about "best" efficiency if it is done at the expense of refinement and luxury.
If they have to use a larger battery to make up for the decrease in efficiency, so be it.
That's why I will not consider any of the current Teslas, even if they can achieve world record "efficiency".
Senior Member
guess2098
Senior Member
close
- Join DateNov 2022
- Posts:318
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2022 Taycan GTS, 2023 EQS580 SUV, 2023 EQS580 sedan
-
Likes:215
-
Liked:83 Times in 65 Posts
lots of Tesla drivers said their consumption is great but convert to range is not the same number. for example, 5mi/kwh with 100kwh battery should gives total of 500 mi range. my friend shows me his model 3p on app is 5.1mi/kwh but there is no way he can drive over 300mi from 100% to 0%. he said his battery size is somewhat 75kwh
MBNUT1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateOct 2002
- LocationCincinnati
- Posts:4,976
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2010 E350 4Matic
-
Likes:4,825
-
Liked:1,345 Times in 964 Posts
I want both efficiency and refinement. While I agree that refinement requires some weight, all weight does not translate into refinement. Mercedes should be both refined and efficient and should be priced accordingly.
MBNUT1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateOct 2002
- LocationCincinnati
- Posts:4,976
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2010 E350 4Matic
-
Likes:4,825
-
Liked:1,345 Times in 964 Posts
Quote:
It all depends on the speed he drives. to achieve that mi/kph and then trying to get that range. Originally Posted by guess2098
lots of Tesla drivers said their consumption is great but convert to range is not the same number. for example, 5mi/kwh with 100kwh battery should gives total of 500 mi range. my friend shows me his model 3p on app is 5.1mi/kwh but there is no way he can drive over 300mi from 100% to 0%. he said his battery size is somewhat 75kwh
Senior Member
guess2098
Senior Member
close
- Join DateNov 2022
- Posts:318
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2022 Taycan GTS, 2023 EQS580 SUV, 2023 EQS580 sedan
-
Likes:215
-
Liked:83 Times in 65 Posts
this is his average for 4 years ~50k miles. not just one time going downhill. I think for such large driving data the calculation should be match his driving style.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBNUT1
It all depends on the speed he drives. to achieve that mi/kph and then trying to get that range.
MBNUT1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateOct 2002
- LocationCincinnati
- Posts:4,976
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2010 E350 4Matic
-
Likes:4,825
-
Liked:1,345 Times in 964 Posts
Yes sounds suspicious to me. 5.1 is a really good number. Unless he has been puttering around town the whole time in some warm but not hot climate I'm calling BS.
Senior Member
guess2098
Senior Member
close
- Join DateNov 2022
- Posts:318
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2022 Taycan GTS, 2023 EQS580 SUV, 2023 EQS580 sedan
-
Likes:215
-
Liked:83 Times in 65 Posts
exactly, that is why I think the real world efficiency for Tesla is not that impressive. they might be the no 1 but that is with small wheel and reduced weight.
just compare model x vs EQS SUV, the efficiency between two cars is not that much of different.
just compare model x vs EQS SUV, the efficiency between two cars is not that much of different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBNUT1
Yes sounds suspicious to me. 5.1 is a really good number. Unless he has been puttering around town the whole time in some warm but not hot climate I'm calling BS.
AppleFan1
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateFeb 2014
- LocationIowa
- Posts:1,938
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2025 EQS580
-
Likes:889
-
Liked:396 Times in 271 Posts
Quote:
You’ve made your point on many threads here. You hate the EQS. Enough of your childish behavior. Buy a Tesla and let us enjoy our EQS’s. Thank you. Originally Posted by vhooloo
MB should focus on quality first, then quantity. Right now it seems they have neither quality nor quantity....








