Evidence of odometer tampering?




I now have a Xentry system and just ran a diagnostic on the car. In particular, I connected to the instrument cluster and ignition lock modules and, sure enough, they disagree on the mileage! The instrument cluster reports a mileage of 23782.36 miles (which is what shows on the display) and the ignition lock reports a mileage of 44531.75 miles. A related test of the instrument cluster shows odometer reading as 38274km, which is consistent with the shown miles, but it also shows an item "Internal data on travel distance" = "IMPLAUSIBLE". This is probably the fault reported by the Foxwell. I take that to mean that all the modules holding mileage don't agree.
I've heard that you can buy a module that plugs into the OBD port that causes mileage to stop accumulating. Just plug it in, drive to your hearts content and remember to unplug it before going in for service or inspection. Nasty stuff. So, this may be what a prior owner did, though it apparently only worked on the odometer and not on other modules in the car.
We're not talking about an extreme deviation here and so there was no clue from wear and tear that the car may have 20K more miles on it than shown on the odometer. But mileage is a big factor for Mercedes vehicles and another 20K would have probably reduced the price at least $5K in my estimation.
My question is whether this is actual evidence of tampering? Anyone have experience on how I should proceed?
Thanks
Have you local mercedes dealer confirm your doubts and then take it up with the BMW dealer. The Mercedes dealer can run a VMI report and may be service history on the car. Did you run the CF on it, that can help with the mileage too
Good Luck




The Xentry software I used to retrieve the data is the very same used by MB dealers, so I'm confident of the data. I'm just not sure if there's other plausible explanations for the discrepancy. One would be replacement of the instrument cluster or the module associated with it. I have the abbreviated VMI that a local MB dealer gave me and it has no evidence that the instrument cluster or module were replaced. Even so, if MB replaced the cluster/module they would have set the correct odometer value on the new cluster, which I know they can do.
I think I need an expert opinion on whether the evidence I have in hand from Xentry is sufficient. I'll have to consult my local MB dealer for guidance.
Thanks for the input.




Hindsight is always 20-20 and in retrospect I probably shouldn't have bought this car since there are some red flags in the CF report. The first is that the original owner kept the car less than one year. The original selling dealer either bought the car back or perhaps the original owner just traded it in? Anyway, that's not my main concern right now.
The car is actually in pretty good shape. I resolved a lot of the diagnostic faults I found by just replacing the batteries, which was overdue.
Can anyone identify the likely culprit for the mileage rollback? It would have to be either owner 2 or owner 3.
file:///C:/Users/ysunf/Downloads/2018S560FaultCodeReportForLeftHeadLamp.pdf
Copy, paste in the tool bar and it would spit it out?
May be you might have ran this report, did you?
Last edited by Faast; Mar 24, 2024 at 11:40 AM.
Trending Topics




He didn't have any more info on hidden travel distance data within the computers, but he did bring up that the tires could be a clue. The VMI and Carfax records show that the tires were changed around 9/22 at about 18K miles. This is just before the 3rd owner bought the car. Based on tire date codes we established that the very same tires are very likely still on the car. The tread remaining on the tires right now indicates about 6K miles of wear. This is plausible if the car currently has about 23K miles on it, per the odometer. It would not be possible for those tires to have 26K miles on them. So, a 43K mileage would have required the 3rd owner to get tires. There's no record of that and it's also likely if they did the date codes on the tires would be at least a year later than what's on the car.
I'm relieved. I didn't want to go through the whole process of dealing with odo tampering. And I also didn't want the car to end up having 43K miles on it! So overall I'm satisfied.
Don't know what the deal is with the Ignition Lock module showing 43K miles, but it appears that's not always hard evidence of tampering.
Thanks to @ygmn and @Faast for your input.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




file:///C:/Users/ysunf/Downloads/2018S560FaultCodeReportForLeftHeadLamp.pdf
Copy, paste in the tool bar and it would spit it out?
May be you might have ran this report, did you?
Thanks.







