article..can you believe this!..is mb being targeted?
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Poplar Grove, IL
07' GL 320 CDI, Iridium Silver, Fully Loaded
article..can you believe this!..is mb being targeted?
both the mb gl320 cdi/ r class diesel rated as "MEANEST CARS" ? ...giving 20/25mpg?...as compared to a heap of other cars giving much less..[lexus lx, hummer, mdx, escalade, x5, q7..etc]
link: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/06/gre...est/index.html
thoughts?
link: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/06/gre...est/index.html
thoughts?
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 29
From: Sydney, Australia
190D 2.5 (x2), 190E 2.6, W202 C240,W202 C43 (C55), W210 E55, W212 E250CDI
Hmmmmmm..............compairing tiny hybrid powered cars to large diesel powered cars is a bit unrealistic.
The MB diesels are some of the cleanest diesel powered vehicles out there. the CO2 emmisions are also some of the lowest for the engine size and power.
Large cars use more fuel to shift their weight, nothing new there
Large cars that have efficient engines and move their weight better than others shouldn't be poorly compaired to small caars that struggle to move their own weight. They should only compair to vehilces in a similar catagory.
The MB diesels are some of the cleanest diesel powered vehicles out there. the CO2 emmisions are also some of the lowest for the engine size and power.
Large cars use more fuel to shift their weight, nothing new there
Large cars that have efficient engines and move their weight better than others shouldn't be poorly compaired to small caars that struggle to move their own weight. They should only compair to vehilces in a similar catagory.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: MA
13 SL550, 14 E63 Wagon, 15 S550, 11 M3, 08 F430 Spider, 12 ML350
both the mb gl320 cdi/ r class diesel rated as "MEANEST CARS" ? ...giving 20/25mpg?...as compared to a heap of other cars giving much less..[lexus lx, hummer, mdx, escalade, x5, q7..etc]
link: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/06/gre...est/index.html
thoughts?
link: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/06/gre...est/index.html
thoughts?
I'll take mean.
What these comparisons always fail to bring out is the so called "dust to dust" analysis where just about all the hybrid vehicles actually use many more energy "units" during their life span. From very expensive R&D, development and design, expensive materials and components, short life span, higher initial "real" (before manufacturer subsidies) cost, inefficient economies of scale, to low resale values etc, all factored in a GL320 is a whole lot better for the planet right now. These "green" vehicles are just a short term answer to the "now in thing" to satisfy the EPA's tunnel vision. High efficiency and clean diesels are what's coming along with more sophisticated DOD gas engines.
Sorry, this subject always gets me going.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
1967 Morris Cooper "S", 1983 911SC, 1997 Toyota Tacoma, 1999 HD FXSTB, 1998 C43
My understanding is the new testing cycle for MPG for 2008 vehicles will be a little more realistic and will show a decrease 'across the board' for ALL vehicles.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 9
From: Las Vegas, NV
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
#6
I'll take mean.
What these comparisons always fail to bring out is the so called "dust to dust" analysis where just about all the hybrid vehicles actually use many more energy "units" during their life span. From very expensive R&D, development and design, expensive materials and components, short life span, higher initial "real" (before manufacturer subsidies) cost, inefficient economies of scale, to low resale values etc, all factored in a GL320 is a whole lot better for the planet right now. These "green" vehicles are just a short term answer to the "now in thing" to satisfy the EPA's tunnel vision. High efficiency and clean diesels are what's coming along with more sophisticated DOD gas engines.
Sorry, this subject always gets me going.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Olney,MD
Wife - E300; GL320 - Sand Biege; Me - F150
I saw this article a couple of weeks ago and thought it was total BS. I couldn't understand why the GL 450 wasn't included in the list because they talk about total manufacturing process, mileage, emissions, etc. on the environment being the criteria for making the list. Since only the engine/emission is different but the milage is much better, I figured that the GL 450 would be on the list too.
So my conclusion was that this tree-hugging group doesn't like diesel engines and selected their criteria to skewed the results against diesels.
So my conclusion was that this tree-hugging group doesn't like diesel engines and selected their criteria to skewed the results against diesels.
#9
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Spicewood, TX
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
I saw this article a couple of weeks ago and thought it was total BS. I couldn't understand why the GL 450 wasn't included in the list because they talk about total manufacturing process, mileage, emissions, etc. on the environment being the criteria for making the list. Since only the engine/emission is different but the milage is much better, I figured that the GL 450 would be on the list too.
So my conclusion was that this tree-hugging group doesn't like diesel engines and selected their criteria to skewed the results against diesels.
So my conclusion was that this tree-hugging group doesn't like diesel engines and selected their criteria to skewed the results against diesels.
#10
Almost always these types of articles/lists are going to be biased. There was a recent 50 Worst Cars of All Time list and it looked like it was extremely biased and was written by a tree hugger. Which is another interesting point, why does it always seem like it's the three huggers that write these automotive related lists?
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 1
From: Scottsdale, AZ
2004 RX330, 2008 Scion xB, 2001 Honda Insight Hybrid, 2010 Toyot Prius v ATP
both the mb gl320 cdi/ r class diesel rated as "MEANEST CARS" ? ...giving 20/25mpg?...as compared to a heap of other cars giving much less..[lexus lx, hummer, mdx, escalade, x5, q7..etc]
link: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/06/gre...est/index.html
thoughts?
link: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/06/gre...est/index.html
thoughts?
#13
Excellent post. Note that the hybrid fad is gradually ending- no Honda Accord hybrid as of 2008 and I feel others will follow suit. By the way, you don't here these guys discussing the energy expenditure, cost and environmental impact of properly disposing the batteries at the end of the vehicle's cycle. I agree that Diesel for now is the better choice. Intrestingly, synthetic diesel produced from natural gas already exists and virtually eliminates previous concerns regarding NOx and sulfur emissions. Presently used in Indonesia.
#14
Honda chopped the accord hybrid because people were expecting civic hybrid like mileage where it was actually designed for better performance with pretty good gas mileage. I considered one but the combination of the high price (for an accord) and lack any good lease or finance rates I would have leased a BMW 3 series instead. The current accord was looking dated too, especially on the inside.
#15
Honda chopped the accord hybrid because people were expecting civic hybrid like mileage where it was actually designed for better performance with pretty good gas mileage. I considered one but the combination of the high price (for an accord) and lack any good lease or finance rates I would have leased a BMW 3 series instead. The current accord was looking dated too, especially on the inside.
No doubt as car enthusiasts and reasonable people we can see through the agendas at work here but it always suprises me how many people believe this BS. As an aside, if memory serves I think MB did a cross country comparo (real world driving) with the ML diesel vs the lexus hybrid. Guess which vehicle fared better?
#17
Actually I was referring to the pending release of the completely revised Accord. I am certain that along with the EPA revisions regarding gas mileage computations that the concept of hybrids enhancing performance while saving fuel will be negated especially when the additional cost is factored.
No doubt as car enthusiasts and reasonable people we can see through the agendas at work here but it always suprises me how many people believe this BS. As an aside, if memory serves I think MB did a cross country comparo (real world driving) with the ML diesel vs the lexus hybrid. Guess which vehicle fared better?
No doubt as car enthusiasts and reasonable people we can see through the agendas at work here but it always suprises me how many people believe this BS. As an aside, if memory serves I think MB did a cross country comparo (real world driving) with the ML diesel vs the lexus hybrid. Guess which vehicle fared better?
#18
I don't think any of us are against capturing wasted energy if the technology is sensible. As it would be unpopular presently, no one has really dained to compute manufacturing costs (energy), upkeep (energy), disposal (energy), and environmental impact of these components. I think you'll be suprised (disappointed?) at the revised EPA stats when implemented. Like most of the member impressions here, the benefits of hybrids are overblown at the expense of other technologies which are equally effective if not superior. This benefits no one except the manufacturers and those with a particular environmental agenda. We all know these vehicles are heavily subsidized by the manufacturers and saw this pattern of behavior during the 70s and 80s gas shortages. Given the ongoing hype, "enviro Chic" impression, and relatively early life cycle of these vehicles I don't think we can say too much about their resale value. Let's see in 2-3 years time.
#20
20 to 25 mpg for an SUV (or a sedan) should be applauded, but most media looks at the mileage numbers of the micro compacts and that becomes the basis for comparision. No thought is given to the hauling capacity or the passengers-per-mile ratio. There's no in-depth reporting. It's strictly a knee-jerk reaction. Unfortuneately, too many people take what CNN says as gospel, and they know it. Yellow journalism is alive and well in the 21st century.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 6
From: Central Pa.
2013 GL450 (traded for 2015 Escalade), 2012 Corvette, 2014 Ford Fusion, Previous: 2007 GL450, 2011
The article, or perhaps the research model, or whatever is very poor! I own a Prius and my GL 450 and love both of them for what they are and do.....you can't make one into the other....... end of story!
#22
Almost a Member!
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
2008 GL320: 2005 C55 (sold): 2005 ML500 (sold): 2001 ML 430 (sold)
Saw this Press Release today on Autoweek, it's from the 2007 Frankfurt Auto Show:
Mercedes-Benz plans to roll out a wide range of diesel- and hybrid-powertrain models over the next three years to cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, and plans to put a B-class wagon powered by a fuel cell into production in 2010.
Mercedes-Benz plans to have Bluetec diesel-hybrid models in its lineup, beginning in 2010, as it seeks to produce and sell the world’s cleanest sedans.
The German automaker laid out its “Road to the Future” today at the IAA in Frankfurt.
Among its plans:
A diesel engine for the United States in 2008 that will meet emissions regulations in all 50 states. The engine will be offered in the R-class wagon, and ML- and GL-class SUVs.
A hybrid version of the ML-class SUV in 2009. The powertrain mates at 4.6-liter V-6 engine with the Two Mode rear-drive hybrid system that DaimlerChrysler has developed in conjunction with BMW and General Motors.
A hybrid version of the S-class sedan will also be introduced in 2009. This S 400 hybrid will mate a V-6 gasoline engine with an integrated starter-generator. The starter-generator provides stop-start function, and can power the car on only electricity for short distances. It also adds an electric boost to the gasoline engine under heavy loads.
Mercedes says the hybrid powertrain is rated at 299 hp, can accelerate the large sedan from 0 to 100 kph (62 mph) in 7.3 seconds, yet burns only 7.9 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (20.9 miles per gallon).
A fuel cell version of the B-class small wagon will go into limited production in 2010. Mercedes said the car will be powered by a new generation of its fuel cell stack that is smaller, yet puts out more power.
Versions of the E-class and S-class sedans powered by Bluetec diesel hybrid powertrains are due in 2010. The powertrains will include a four-cylinder diesel engine and seven-speed automatic transmission. The E-class hybrid will burn 5.1 liters (1.3 gallons) of fuel per 100 kilometers, or about 47.6 miles per gallon.
A version of the C class with the Bluetec diesel hybrid is due after 2010, Mercedes said.
-end-
Mercedes-Benz plans to roll out a wide range of diesel- and hybrid-powertrain models over the next three years to cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, and plans to put a B-class wagon powered by a fuel cell into production in 2010.
Mercedes-Benz plans to have Bluetec diesel-hybrid models in its lineup, beginning in 2010, as it seeks to produce and sell the world’s cleanest sedans.
The German automaker laid out its “Road to the Future” today at the IAA in Frankfurt.
Among its plans:
A diesel engine for the United States in 2008 that will meet emissions regulations in all 50 states. The engine will be offered in the R-class wagon, and ML- and GL-class SUVs.
A hybrid version of the ML-class SUV in 2009. The powertrain mates at 4.6-liter V-6 engine with the Two Mode rear-drive hybrid system that DaimlerChrysler has developed in conjunction with BMW and General Motors.
A hybrid version of the S-class sedan will also be introduced in 2009. This S 400 hybrid will mate a V-6 gasoline engine with an integrated starter-generator. The starter-generator provides stop-start function, and can power the car on only electricity for short distances. It also adds an electric boost to the gasoline engine under heavy loads.
Mercedes says the hybrid powertrain is rated at 299 hp, can accelerate the large sedan from 0 to 100 kph (62 mph) in 7.3 seconds, yet burns only 7.9 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (20.9 miles per gallon).
A fuel cell version of the B-class small wagon will go into limited production in 2010. Mercedes said the car will be powered by a new generation of its fuel cell stack that is smaller, yet puts out more power.
Versions of the E-class and S-class sedans powered by Bluetec diesel hybrid powertrains are due in 2010. The powertrains will include a four-cylinder diesel engine and seven-speed automatic transmission. The E-class hybrid will burn 5.1 liters (1.3 gallons) of fuel per 100 kilometers, or about 47.6 miles per gallon.
A version of the C class with the Bluetec diesel hybrid is due after 2010, Mercedes said.
-end-
#23
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: South of the Mason Dixon, North of the Gulf
2007 GL 320 CDI, 2008 M5
#24
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: South of the Mason Dixon, North of the Gulf
2007 GL 320 CDI, 2008 M5
Saw this Press Release today on Autoweek, it's from the 2007 Frankfurt Auto Show: MB will introduce versions of the E-class and S-class sedans powered by Bluetec diesel hybrid powertrains are due in 2010. The powertrains will include a four-cylinder diesel engine and seven-speed automatic transmission.
On the other hand, is the engine bay of the current S or GL big enough to accomodate the V6 or V8 diesel and an electric motor? I seem to remember that MB did a show car with the V8 diesel from the GL 420 mated to a electric motor to make an interesting hybrid. Wasn't that when we got the first glimpse of the styling on the GL 550?
#25
Saw this Press Release today on Autoweek, it's from the 2007 Frankfurt Auto Show:
Mercedes-Benz plans to roll out a wide range of diesel- and hybrid-powertrain models over the next three years to cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, and plans to put a B-class wagon powered by a fuel cell into production in 2010.
Mercedes-Benz plans to have Bluetec diesel-hybrid models in its lineup, beginning in 2010, as it seeks to produce and sell the world’s cleanest sedans.
The German automaker laid out its “Road to the Future” today at the IAA in Frankfurt.
Among its plans:
A diesel engine for the United States in 2008 that will meet emissions regulations in all 50 states. The engine will be offered in the R-class wagon, and ML- and GL-class SUVs.
A hybrid version of the ML-class SUV in 2009. The powertrain mates at 4.6-liter V-6 engine with the Two Mode rear-drive hybrid system that DaimlerChrysler has developed in conjunction with BMW and General Motors.
A hybrid version of the S-class sedan will also be introduced in 2009. This S 400 hybrid will mate a V-6 gasoline engine with an integrated starter-generator. The starter-generator provides stop-start function, and can power the car on only electricity for short distances. It also adds an electric boost to the gasoline engine under heavy loads.
Mercedes says the hybrid powertrain is rated at 299 hp, can accelerate the large sedan from 0 to 100 kph (62 mph) in 7.3 seconds, yet burns only 7.9 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (20.9 miles per gallon).
A fuel cell version of the B-class small wagon will go into limited production in 2010. Mercedes said the car will be powered by a new generation of its fuel cell stack that is smaller, yet puts out more power.
Versions of the E-class and S-class sedans powered by Bluetec diesel hybrid powertrains are due in 2010. The powertrains will include a four-cylinder diesel engine and seven-speed automatic transmission. The E-class hybrid will burn 5.1 liters (1.3 gallons) of fuel per 100 kilometers, or about 47.6 miles per gallon.
A version of the C class with the Bluetec diesel hybrid is due after 2010, Mercedes said.
-end-
Mercedes-Benz plans to roll out a wide range of diesel- and hybrid-powertrain models over the next three years to cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, and plans to put a B-class wagon powered by a fuel cell into production in 2010.
Mercedes-Benz plans to have Bluetec diesel-hybrid models in its lineup, beginning in 2010, as it seeks to produce and sell the world’s cleanest sedans.
The German automaker laid out its “Road to the Future” today at the IAA in Frankfurt.
Among its plans:
A diesel engine for the United States in 2008 that will meet emissions regulations in all 50 states. The engine will be offered in the R-class wagon, and ML- and GL-class SUVs.
A hybrid version of the ML-class SUV in 2009. The powertrain mates at 4.6-liter V-6 engine with the Two Mode rear-drive hybrid system that DaimlerChrysler has developed in conjunction with BMW and General Motors.
A hybrid version of the S-class sedan will also be introduced in 2009. This S 400 hybrid will mate a V-6 gasoline engine with an integrated starter-generator. The starter-generator provides stop-start function, and can power the car on only electricity for short distances. It also adds an electric boost to the gasoline engine under heavy loads.
Mercedes says the hybrid powertrain is rated at 299 hp, can accelerate the large sedan from 0 to 100 kph (62 mph) in 7.3 seconds, yet burns only 7.9 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (20.9 miles per gallon).
A fuel cell version of the B-class small wagon will go into limited production in 2010. Mercedes said the car will be powered by a new generation of its fuel cell stack that is smaller, yet puts out more power.
Versions of the E-class and S-class sedans powered by Bluetec diesel hybrid powertrains are due in 2010. The powertrains will include a four-cylinder diesel engine and seven-speed automatic transmission. The E-class hybrid will burn 5.1 liters (1.3 gallons) of fuel per 100 kilometers, or about 47.6 miles per gallon.
A version of the C class with the Bluetec diesel hybrid is due after 2010, Mercedes said.
-end-