Camera ineffective at night
This is noticeably worse than single camera systems in the previous gen or any other cars.
You might say that the system is practically useless at night.
Anyone else noticed this?



This is noticeably worse than single camera systems in the previous gen or any other cars.
You might say that the system is practically useless at night.
Anyone else noticed this?
It also seems like backup lights are dim - so without the camera I still see little behind me.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG



I disagree that because it's great in light we can live with poor picture at night. In today's technology, I don't think it has to be either/or. I'm afraid to back out a drive at night. I see nothing - with cameras or mirror or window. I'm wondering if there's a brighter backup bulb that can be switched in?
It seems to me that giving the 360 camera infrared capability wouldn't be a technological feat or very expensive. You can get infrared home security cameras pretty cheap these days. I'm not suggesting that MB go buy some off the shelf Home Depot cameras and tape 'em on the mirrors, but if companies can make IR home security cameras for $20 or so, I don't see why MB can't make some suitable for their application.



The fuel range calculator seems to be pretty inaccurate as well. It varies pretty widely based on pedal use at the moment vs. historical driving pattern.
And for fuel efficiency - the range for the gauge isn't helping me. I'd rather see greater detail in the 10-25 range - don't care when I'm getting 80 miles to the gallon (ie. not moving). The car is so smooth & responsive, I'm eating up way too much gas and need to work on efficient driving.
I'm surprised! You have had x164. Compare only the rear camera quality of your new GL to that of the older, so that is apples to apples comparison and then tell me how you expectations were not greater about the new model compare to x164.
You are a great contributor and long time poster who I came to appreciate since my order was placed for a GL early this year. I've learned a lot from your posts , but I am puzzled why you don't hold mb to a higher standard. There are cars under 20k with better quality rear camera than my 120k+ mb!
Last edited by cyberorth; Nov 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM.
I'm surprised! You have had x164. Compare only the rear camera quality of your new GL to that of the older, so that is apples to apples comparison and then tell me how you expectations were not greater about the new model compare to x164.
You are a great contributor and long time poster who I came to appreciate since my order was placed for a GL early this year. I've learned a lot from your posts , but I am puzzled why you don't hold mb to a higher standard. There are cars under 20k with better quality rear camera than my 120k+ mb!
Well…..I agree the previous "rear view camera" WAS better at night, and frankly, more vivid in contrast in the daytime…..the change seems to be related to moving to the 360 system unless some of the folks out there are talking about the stand alone rearview system as well. The MB 360 cam system has been rated by Car and Driver and other mags as the "best" in clarity and accuracy of vehicle placement in tight situations and I have to agree with those assessments and have found the system to be extremely helpful in that respect. I guess my point is…….I so much appreciate the overhead surround function, that if MB sacrificed night time effectiveness in order to gain the overhead composite function….I'll take it because night maneuvering ( need for system ) is not something i need to do very much. I am more upset that they took away the ability to lock the rear differential in the on/off road package……something i have had to use once or twice over the years and the Land Rover still has but the GL is, overall, a better vehicle….. it's all in what each of us thinks is important. Thank you for your comments!
So, they can either pump up the camera or pump up the backup lights.
So, they can either pump up the camera or pump up the backup lights.

So, they can either pump up the camera or pump up the backup lights.

And I completely agree that the Night Vision is a total waste of money. It doesn't show much more than what you can already see with your headlights. Worse, it wouldn't be very useful even if it allowed for much farther vision than the headlights.
When you're driving, you can't look away from the road and glance down to the IR picture on the nav screen more than occasionally and for a very short time. Therefore, unless you happen to glance at the screen at precisely the right moment, you're not going to see an object via the IR, now matter how far down the road it lets you see. If you have a passenger, you could ask them to stare at the screen, I suppose. But then the fact that the Night Vision does little that your headlights don't already do, that seems like wasted effort. The Night Vision needs to be on a head up display and it needs to show things farther down the road.
I want my money back on that one, for sure. Too bad IR cameras for the 360 view aren't available. That would be very useful, indeed.






