Acoustic Glass, Driver/Passenger Doors
Idel: 37db
60mph on smooth asphalt: 57db
60mph on rough pavement: 60db
25mph and acceleration at 3k rpm: 45db
These numbers are not bad for an SUV but still not at Lexus ES350 levels.
Just seems odd the random nature of it; whether a car has the acoustic glass or not. In US, it is not on the order sheet online, nor on the DOG, as I sat with my salesman while we spec'd the order from beginning to end, line by line. I pretty much got every option except exterior carbon fiber stuff, heated rear seats/steering wheel and HUD. I have the P3 package and even the designo black interior. So I don't think it's a package issue, at least not in the US with the '43. Go figure.
So, anyway, whether the acoustic glass is a big deal or not, thanks forum members for shining a light on this.
Last edited by Skizz; Mar 1, 2017 at 08:56 PM.
I had my windshield replaced three weeks after taking delivery because of stone chip damage (thanks, I-5 in Washington state!). I neglected to check the original windshield for an "acoustic glass" marking before it was replaced. However, the replacement windshield was ordered through the local M-B dealership's parts department by supplying my car's VIN, which the dealer cross-referenced to get the replacement windshield's part number.
After installation, I could not find any "acoustic glass" marking on the new windshield. Now I don't know whether the original windshield and the replacement windshield are different, or the same.
In the dealership's showroom, I checked the windshield on a GLC, and it did indeed have "acoustic glass" marked on it.
Back to the parts desk - I asked the parts guy to look up the part number for my VIN, and it matched the replacement windshield I got. He assured me that was the proper, and only, replacement part for that VIN. One possible conclusion is that an "acoustic glass" replacement windshield is not available, at least, in Canada. Or maybe - the replacement windshield is "acoustic glass", but lacks the marking.
I asked the parts guy to look up the replacement part number for the GLC in the showroom with the "acoustic glass" windshield (using that car's VIN). The replacement part is the same as the one I got for my car.
Oh, well.
Last edited by BCRCornet; Mar 2, 2017 at 12:23 AM.
I had my windshield replaced three weeks after taking delivery because of stone chip damage (thanks, I-5 in Washington state!). I neglected to check the original windshield for an "acoustic glass" marking before it was replaced. However, the replacement windshield was ordered through the local M-B dealership's parts department by supplying my car's VIN, which the dealer cross-referenced to get the replacement windshield's part number.
After installation, I could not find any "acoustic glass" marking on the new windshield. Now I don't know whether the original windshield and the replacement windshield are different, or the same.
In the dealership's showroom, I checked the windshield on a GLC, and it did indeed have "acoustic glass" marked on it.
Back to the parts desk - I asked the parts guy to look up the part number for my VIN, and it matched the replacement windshield I got. He assured me that was the proper, and only, replacement part for that VIN. One possible conclusion is that an "acoustic glass" replacement windshield is not available, at least, in Canada. Or maybe - the replacement windshield is "acoustic glass", but lacks the marking.
I asked the parts guy to look up the replacement part number for the GLC in the showroom with the "acoustic glass" windshield (using that car's VIN). The replacement part is the same as the one I got for my car.
Oh, well.
(can't get the page to load up... but found the picture in google)
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
My windshield had the weird "twin chips" -- meaning there are 3 places where there are two chips about 3 mm apart, what looks like caused by 1 stone hit.
All things have goods and bads. Even if you got all front windows and windshield replaced with acoustic glass, the car still has fair amount of noise in it. - To me, the insulation in doors is not as good as GLK. Also the run-flat tires are big source.
So if you really want a quiet car, don't pay attention to acoustic glass -- go get the tires replaced with regular tires.
This is the logo on my replacement windshield.
This is the logo on the windshield of the GLC in the dealer's showroom.Maybe only windshields installed at the factory are marked with the "acoustic glass" logo, and replacement windshields lack the logo, but are nevertheless "acoustic glass" anyway?
Attachment 349990 This is the logo on my replacement windshield.
Attachment 349989 This is the logo on the windshield of the GLC in the dealer's showroom.
Maybe only windshields installed at the factory are marked with the "acoustic glass" logo, and replacement windshields lack the logo, but are nevertheless "acoustic glass" anyway?
Supposedly, code 851 includes both acoustic windshield and side windows. The absence of acoustic labeling on some windshields certainly confuses things, but that doesn't necessarily mean these windshields are not acoustic. Of course, we can't be assured that the code requirements are always uniformly applied during assembly. Glass supplies on hand probably dictate to some extent which type of glass gets installed. Considering code 251 is/was a no-cost option in the U.S. -- with no buyer input possible -- I suppose that gives/gave M-B some freedom to keep the assembly lines moving. Strictly my opinion.
Ultimately it is probably not a huge deal. I just find the screwiness and random nature of it irksome, even if it is a supply issue. MB should own it and have factual information on it at the dealer level, IMHO. Generally speaking, the dealer has no idea what this is all about.
Attachment 349990 This is the logo on my replacement windshield.
Attachment 349989 This is the logo on the windshield of the GLC in the dealer's showroom.
Maybe only windshields installed at the factory are marked with the "acoustic glass" logo, and replacement windshields lack the logo, but are nevertheless "acoustic glass" anyway?
Richard


