Partially loaded GLC vs. Fully loaded NX
I have had this dilemma for quite a while and thought I would ask on this forum. I have a budget of ~$60k CAD and am looking for a compact SUV, mostly for myself (I am a single in my 20s with no kids).
I have test driven both NX and GLC. I prioritize safety and really hope to add all the safety features. I plan to keep the car for 5-6 years.
In terms of GLC:
Pros:
- Drive: the drive was quite fun. I felt planted and the car cornered very well. It was an engaging ride. I liked the ride better than NX.
- Styling: the styling is more conservative and likely more timeless
- Safety: lots of standard safety features which are important to me.
- Interior: looks very modern and classy.
Cons:
- PRICE: Right now, the one I am looking at is $60k CAD (out the door price) and it does not have memory seats, power adjustable steering column (it's manual lol), and keyless entry. It has a keyless start button, but does not have keyless entry. It also lacks parking sensors (but has rear view camera) and heated steering wheel. In order to add all these, I would have to pay 3k extra. I could pay for it, but I feel like I am falling into the automaker's tactic and I will likely have to wait for the car for a long time.
- ?reliability: MB is not known to be very reliable.. or at least costly to maintain. Having said that, GLC was among top 10 reliable vehicles according to Consumer Report and the predecessor GLK was quite reliable. I am not sure what the long-term reliability would be for this model.
In terms of NX:
Pros:
- Price: with 2018 refresh coming in, I think I have the leverage to lower the price. I saw that some Canadians were able to get fully loaded F-sport for around $55k out-the-door
- Interior space: It's quite comfortable in the back
- Styling: the F-sport model looks quite sporty and liked the "young" feeling, especially with the red seats.
- "Perceived" reliability: People always suggest that Lexus is reliable... despite the fact that the turbo engine has not been proven in terms of long-term reliability, but it is what it is.
Cons:
- Styling: May go out of date in a while.. especially with the aggressive styling
- Relative lack of power: the engine took a while to really keep going... felt a little bit lethargic. There was a disconnect between styling and the power (the car's not as aggressive as it looks)
- Rear visibility: rear visibility was not so great when I test drove twice.
- Multimedia: navigation system is similar to what my parents' 09 RX had... lol.
All in all, while I do enjoy the ride of GLC better, I am mostly concerned about its price and lack of options. I know the above options are not "necessary" for a safe daily ride, but I just feel like a $60k car should have them...
Some people tell me that it's better to get a lowly optioned car with better re-sale value and less concern about break-down in the long-term...
Just wondering what your thoughts might be on this...
Thanks!




We had the same dilemma, not sure of pricing differences between continents.
Purchased GLC wagon and 12 months later a GLC Coupe. We got a loaded GLC.
The NX we drove was nice, bit too narrow in seating, not happy with erratic cruise control, gallops away on decents and under load up hills tended to hunt for a gear in auto. Top of range LED headlights in GLC kill average LED lights in NX. Found adaptive cruise control in NX shut down at 100kph in driving rain with poor visability, seems a 'safety feature', not impressed. Lexus has excellent quality, we owned an RX before buying GLC.
So far 30,000Km in my wagon, diesel, excellent drive, economy. Had one issue, dealer fixed after 2nd visit, but gave me loan car each time. Capped price servicing for first 3 years ok. We like HUD, memory seats, adaptive cruise control, etc. Auto parking works ok.
Hope this helps.
Good luck. At the end of the day both good brands and service.
It appears that only partially loaded GLC without some of the "basic" luxury features (e.g. heated steering wheel, keyless entry) is more expensive than a fully loaded NX...
I'm wondering if GLC is worth the premium even after letting go of the options. Perhaps it has to do with... better engine/chassis?

I like my GLC as the interior was night and day compared with the NX. Plus no upgrade to the stereo available on the NX. Reliability is not as good with Mercedes and resale value is lower. I only buy loaded cars, what's the point of compromising when you intend to keep it for several years.
I did shop both cars before purchasing the GLC. I had a hard time with the color of the interior and the cheap finishes of the NX. The GLC is forcing Lexus to up their game. The GLC was more money but I felt I was getting my money's worth. Even if I do spend more time at the Dealership for repairs.
Good Luck.
Last edited by MITCH1975; May 17, 2017 at 08:22 PM.
I'm curious what kind of replies you may get on the Lexus forums. My personal and extremely biased opinion? -- The GLC.
The only experience I have with Lexus is with an older 2014 IS 350 F Sport. I quickly learned the "F Sport" tag of the name is a joke. The car does look nice and aggressive, but had the same engine as everything else and the steering was, as with many Toyotas... absolute slop.
I honestly think that reliability will be on par between both vehicles. Disclaimer - this is by no means a "professional" opinion.
I love the interior of GLC and my previous Lexus doesn't even compare. It honestly felt like a Toyota not long after my purchase. Is the premium cost to the Lexus worth it? Well in my opinion yes, that's why I'm getting the GLC. But I suppose it comes down to opportunity cost and (if you rank your pros and cons list in order of importance to you) what the best fit for you is in terms of potential sacrifices.
I hope you find the answer you are seeking and make the purchase that is best suited for you.
I keep going back and forth; one day, I would say these are not necessary and I can live without them. Another day, I would torture myself thinking that these are a must on a luxury vehicle lol.
People on the Lexus forum are all recommending NX (any surprises? haha) based on reliability, but I am not sure if this has to do with "perceived" reliability vs. a real one, as Lexus parts seem to cost just as much.
Last edited by confusedd; May 17, 2017 at 05:46 PM.
Trending Topics
I keep going back and forth; one day, I would say these are not necessary and I can live without them. Another day, I would torture myself thinking that these are a must on a luxury vehicle lol.
People on the Lexus forum are all recommending NX (any surprises? haha) based on reliability, but I am not sure if this has to do with "perceived" reliability vs. a real one, as Lexus parts seem to cost just as much.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
My first car was a brand new 2008 C300 Sport (half paid for by myself), and I bought it without options because we needed a new car and were on a budget, so that was the compromise with my dad. Granted, I would have liked nav and heated seats (or a C63 instead :p), but I loved the car a LOT nonetheless and still always enjoyed driving it until I eventually switched up.
Maybe consider a fully loaded C300 4Matic instead? Should be about that price so you won't have the options dilemma.
I guess it comes down to... better driving feel or a couple more options that you aren't sure you will use. Does the vehicle you drive now have all of these options? Can you not live without them? Oh the questions and trade-offs of car buying
Personally I dislike CVT's they make the vehicle feel like it is powered by rubber bands.
I've decided on the GLC, as I can live without those options lol. Maybe I will pay a lot more if it breaks down but I like the vehicle too much lol.






