Major Repair for 2020 GLE350
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
2020 GLE 350 w/ AMG Exterior V167
Major Repair for 2020 GLE350
Where to start?
Hello, I'm new to the forum and actually joined to provide a heads up to anyone who owns a 2020 GLE350.
Long story short, the line that feeds washer fluid to the rear wiper started leaking. We noticed a blue stain on the headliner on the drivers side just above the rear seat. It was dropped off at the dealer last Friday. They still have it. Not because the parts were not available, but because the ENTIRE interior of the vehicle had to be removed. All seats, carpet, interior body panels, head-liner, and center console. Everything, the service writer advised, but the dash. Even the brake booster and part of the brake system under the hood had to be disassembled in order to run the new line to the rear wiper. WOW! What an engineering feat. To replace a washer hose, the entire interior and brake system needs to be removed. I expressed my concerns to service department and they agreed that it was an engineering disaster to design it that way.
My service writer also stated that he hopes ours was a fluke, and that they don't see any more of these issues, due to the immense undertaking it requires to repair.
I contacted MBUSA Customer Service to express my concerns that our brand new $65k MB SUV with 6k miles on it had to be, in a sense, disassembled to repair a washer hose. My concern was met with attitude and brush off. The CS rep went as far as to advise me to take up my concerns with the service department. The CS Rep asked "what do you want us to do about it? It's getting repaired". She further stated that there was nothing she could do about how the vehicle was designed, which I understand, however a little compassion for an upset customer would've been sufficient. Apparently she doesn't appreciated spending what we spent on such a "marvel of engineering" only to have it torn apart by a MB mechanic at a dealership.
Our concern is that the vehicle won't be assembled as it would be at the factory. Our concern is that our vehicle interior was assembled by a mechanic and not factory technicians. Maybe our concerns are misplaced, but having the entire interior removed and replaced on a vehicle barely 6 months old is greatly alarming to us.
Hello, I'm new to the forum and actually joined to provide a heads up to anyone who owns a 2020 GLE350.
Long story short, the line that feeds washer fluid to the rear wiper started leaking. We noticed a blue stain on the headliner on the drivers side just above the rear seat. It was dropped off at the dealer last Friday. They still have it. Not because the parts were not available, but because the ENTIRE interior of the vehicle had to be removed. All seats, carpet, interior body panels, head-liner, and center console. Everything, the service writer advised, but the dash. Even the brake booster and part of the brake system under the hood had to be disassembled in order to run the new line to the rear wiper. WOW! What an engineering feat. To replace a washer hose, the entire interior and brake system needs to be removed. I expressed my concerns to service department and they agreed that it was an engineering disaster to design it that way.
My service writer also stated that he hopes ours was a fluke, and that they don't see any more of these issues, due to the immense undertaking it requires to repair.
I contacted MBUSA Customer Service to express my concerns that our brand new $65k MB SUV with 6k miles on it had to be, in a sense, disassembled to repair a washer hose. My concern was met with attitude and brush off. The CS rep went as far as to advise me to take up my concerns with the service department. The CS Rep asked "what do you want us to do about it? It's getting repaired". She further stated that there was nothing she could do about how the vehicle was designed, which I understand, however a little compassion for an upset customer would've been sufficient. Apparently she doesn't appreciated spending what we spent on such a "marvel of engineering" only to have it torn apart by a MB mechanic at a dealership.
Our concern is that the vehicle won't be assembled as it would be at the factory. Our concern is that our vehicle interior was assembled by a mechanic and not factory technicians. Maybe our concerns are misplaced, but having the entire interior removed and replaced on a vehicle barely 6 months old is greatly alarming to us.
The following users liked this post:
Lanzz (10-04-2019)
#2
I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news for your situation, but I lived through a similar experience years ago, and there is virtually no way it will look like a new vehicle when they are finished with the repair. Better prepare yourself for when you retrieve your vehicle. I had a 1996 S320 SWB, and when the car was a week old, I started seeing dark marks appearing all over the parchment leather seat surfaces on all of the seats, front and rear. Long story short, a technician at the factory in Germany used the wrong marker to label the underside of the leather, which was routinely done to specify the seat location in the car prior to installation. My local dealer had to replace all of the leather, and not only did it not look anything like a factory job (loose all over), they broke the rear view mirror and scratched the door sills and all of that had to be replaced. I couldn't live with the car in that condition, and MB corporate offered zero sympathy. I sold the car and bought a 1998 SL 500. I didn't take a significant loss because it was a leftover at the end of the model year and the dealer dropped the price significantly. The buyer never even noticed, but I'm a perfectionist and he wasn't.
The following users liked this post:
jsa1983 (10-04-2019)
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
2020 GLE 350 w/ AMG Exterior V167
Update...
I went by the dealer today and saw the carnage first hand. The service writer advised that after several calls to Mercedes it was determined that a repair to the hose vs replacement would have been a better option. Mercedes advised since no such repair parts were available, the tear down and replacement hose was the only option. He said repairing the hose and splicing in a new peice would've taken an hour and would have meant only dropping down the rear of the headliner.
Furthermore, I informed the service writer that I should've been contacted and informed ahead of the tear down. Something as involved as removing the entire interior should've warranted informing the owner. Not after the fact.
Still no follow up from MB USA as I requested. Our first Mercedes experience is not going well.
I went by the dealer today and saw the carnage first hand. The service writer advised that after several calls to Mercedes it was determined that a repair to the hose vs replacement would have been a better option. Mercedes advised since no such repair parts were available, the tear down and replacement hose was the only option. He said repairing the hose and splicing in a new peice would've taken an hour and would have meant only dropping down the rear of the headliner.
Furthermore, I informed the service writer that I should've been contacted and informed ahead of the tear down. Something as involved as removing the entire interior should've warranted informing the owner. Not after the fact.
Still no follow up from MB USA as I requested. Our first Mercedes experience is not going well.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 6,607
Received 1,186 Likes
on
853 Posts
2020 GLE 450; 2023 BMW M2 Coupe
Update...
I went by the dealer today and saw the carnage first hand. The service writer advised that after several calls to Mercedes it was determined that a repair to the hose vs replacement would have been a better option. Mercedes advised since no such repair parts were available, the tear down and replacement hose was the only option. He said repairing the hose and splicing in a new peice would've taken an hour and would have meant only dropping down the rear of the headliner.
Furthermore, I informed the service writer that I should've been contacted and informed ahead of the tear down. Something as involved as removing the entire interior should've warranted informing the owner. Not after the fact.
Still no follow up from MB USA as I requested. Our first Mercedes experience is not going well.
I went by the dealer today and saw the carnage first hand. The service writer advised that after several calls to Mercedes it was determined that a repair to the hose vs replacement would have been a better option. Mercedes advised since no such repair parts were available, the tear down and replacement hose was the only option. He said repairing the hose and splicing in a new peice would've taken an hour and would have meant only dropping down the rear of the headliner.
Furthermore, I informed the service writer that I should've been contacted and informed ahead of the tear down. Something as involved as removing the entire interior should've warranted informing the owner. Not after the fact.
Still no follow up from MB USA as I requested. Our first Mercedes experience is not going well.
#7
Sorry but that's absolutely ridiculous for a car that's just come out. That thing will never be put together as tight as it was from the factory and there's gonna be more rattles in the end.
The following 4 users liked this post by tinman831:
Trending Topics
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
I am not familiar with that specific repair on your GLE - and I understand that in this case to get the repair "done right" required interior tear down - and as a MB Owner of course it's shocking to look at the "carnage" as you put it. It's hard enough for me to look at any Mercedes in interior or engine tear down - even though it's not my MB.
The work done as dictated by Mercedes US is what needs to be done in their opinion to get the "job done right" - and you're right to assume this was a fluke deal with that rear washer hose since I have not heard this happening on this forum (I could have missed something) from W164's on up..
The interiors when assembled at Vance are done with primarily labor/airtool - unlike body panels which are done by "Kuka's" - and interiors aren't engines either - with proper tech shop time your interior can be reinstalled 100% to factory spec - this isn't rocket science - it's a question of tech labor time.
If you want to go for Lemon Law - best to keep records of the down time - and records when you get it back - and get attorney's opinion/assistance - "Lemon Law Replacement" is NOT something any manufacturer does willingly - and in this case your issues is not a safety issue ..
The work done as dictated by Mercedes US is what needs to be done in their opinion to get the "job done right" - and you're right to assume this was a fluke deal with that rear washer hose since I have not heard this happening on this forum (I could have missed something) from W164's on up..
The interiors when assembled at Vance are done with primarily labor/airtool - unlike body panels which are done by "Kuka's" - and interiors aren't engines either - with proper tech shop time your interior can be reinstalled 100% to factory spec - this isn't rocket science - it's a question of tech labor time.
If you want to go for Lemon Law - best to keep records of the down time - and records when you get it back - and get attorney's opinion/assistance - "Lemon Law Replacement" is NOT something any manufacturer does willingly - and in this case your issues is not a safety issue ..
The following users liked this post:
jsa1983 (10-05-2019)
#12
Out Of Control!!
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: unbegrenzt
Posts: 13,467
Received 3,989 Likes
on
3,136 Posts
2017 GLE350 4MATIC
The photos show a typical headliner removal procedure. Many vehicles, including Toyota, would be similar. Lots of trim pieces need to be removed to remove the headliner, which is normally one contiguous component. The seats remain installed in the photo, when will they be removed?
Inconvenient, but not unusual.
Inconvenient, but not unusual.
The following users liked this post:
jsa1983 (10-06-2019)
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
2020 GLE 350 w/ AMG Exterior V167
The photos show a typical headliner removal procedure. Many vehicles, including Toyota, would be similar. Lots of trim pieces need to be removed to remove the headliner, which is normally one contiguous component. The seats remain installed in the photo, when will they be removed?
Inconvenient, but not unusual.
Inconvenient, but not unusual.
We have been promised the vehicle would be ready on Tuesday. A 12 day repair for a rubber washer hose. The service writer advised that a repair of the hose would have taken an hour. Apparently, MB has a repair kit forthcoming. So there may be others out there. The repair kit, per MB is not ready for release yet.
#14
MBWorld God!
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/EvoM/fcotmicon.gif)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: on my way
Posts: 30,682
Received 3,416 Likes
on
2,855 Posts
2012 CLS63
6K miles? That's hardly a new car. But this story still sux to read and I hope it gets properly sorted out!
Edit: I just saw your pictures and if this was me I'd be so fawking pissed off I wouldn't be able to see straight!!!
Edit: I just saw your pictures and if this was me I'd be so fawking pissed off I wouldn't be able to see straight!!!
Last edited by hyperion667; 10-06-2019 at 07:34 AM.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
At the end of the day it is bad design and MB should be ashamed.
For someone to say it is a "typical headliner removal" is unbelievable, wonder how they would feel if it was their car and in my opinion 6000 miles is a new car.
For someone to say it is a "typical headliner removal" is unbelievable, wonder how they would feel if it was their car and in my opinion 6000 miles is a new car.
#16
Out Of Control!!
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: unbegrenzt
Posts: 13,467
Received 3,989 Likes
on
3,136 Posts
2017 GLE350 4MATIC
The service associate is being empathetic, as he/she should be doing.
Neither the headliner removal procedure, nor the routing of the rear washer tube, are unusual. 20 year old Toyota SUVs have the same headliner removal procedure and rear washer tube routing.
This is a very inconvenient situation, for sure.
Did you mention if the service associate gave you a definitive root cause of the washer fluid leak? It could have been a pinched or cut washer fluid hose. Such a thing can happen during the assembly process, uncommonly and unfortunately. It can also happen when the component supplier ships to M-B a damaged fluid hose or headliner+fluid hose assembly.
The decision by M-B to field repair by splicing a hose section, vs installing a new hose, can be called into question. A new replacement part is always the better option. A field repair can fail in unexpected ways.
From reading this section of the site, it seems the V167 is having new platform teething pains.
Neither the headliner removal procedure, nor the routing of the rear washer tube, are unusual. 20 year old Toyota SUVs have the same headliner removal procedure and rear washer tube routing.
This is a very inconvenient situation, for sure.
Did you mention if the service associate gave you a definitive root cause of the washer fluid leak? It could have been a pinched or cut washer fluid hose. Such a thing can happen during the assembly process, uncommonly and unfortunately. It can also happen when the component supplier ships to M-B a damaged fluid hose or headliner+fluid hose assembly.
The decision by M-B to field repair by splicing a hose section, vs installing a new hose, can be called into question. A new replacement part is always the better option. A field repair can fail in unexpected ways.
From reading this section of the site, it seems the V167 is having new platform teething pains.
Last edited by chassis; 10-06-2019 at 11:13 AM.
The following users liked this post:
conditionone (01-21-2022)
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 6,607
Received 1,186 Likes
on
853 Posts
2020 GLE 450; 2023 BMW M2 Coupe
Is the hose actually rubber, or is it plastic? I would expect the latter, though I would think rubber might be more resistant to damage.
Last edited by GregW / Oregon; 10-06-2019 at 01:03 PM.
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
2020 GLE 350 w/ AMG Exterior V167
The service associate is being empathetic, as he/she should be doing.
Neither the headliner removal procedure, nor the routing of the rear washer tube, are unusual. 20 year old Toyota SUVs have the same headliner removal procedure and rear washer tube routing.
This is a very inconvenient situation, for sure.
Did you mention if the service associate gave you a definitive root cause of the washer fluid leak? It could have been a pinched or cut washer fluid hose. Such a thing can happen during the assembly process, uncommonly and unfortunately. It can also happen when the component supplier ships to M-B a damaged fluid hose or headliner+fluid hose assembly.
The decision by M-B to field repair by splicing a hose section, vs installing a new hose, can be called into question. A new replacement part is always the better option. A field repair can fail in unexpected ways.
From reading this section of the site, it seems the V167 is having new platform teething pains.
Neither the headliner removal procedure, nor the routing of the rear washer tube, are unusual. 20 year old Toyota SUVs have the same headliner removal procedure and rear washer tube routing.
This is a very inconvenient situation, for sure.
Did you mention if the service associate gave you a definitive root cause of the washer fluid leak? It could have been a pinched or cut washer fluid hose. Such a thing can happen during the assembly process, uncommonly and unfortunately. It can also happen when the component supplier ships to M-B a damaged fluid hose or headliner+fluid hose assembly.
The decision by M-B to field repair by splicing a hose section, vs installing a new hose, can be called into question. A new replacement part is always the better option. A field repair can fail in unexpected ways.
From reading this section of the site, it seems the V167 is having new platform teething pains.
It's not a simple headliner removal. I would not have an issue with the headliner removal. It's the removal of the entire interior PLUS portions of the braking system that are the issue.
Last edited by RamAir50; 10-06-2019 at 01:14 PM.
#19
MBWorld God!
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/EvoM/fcotmicon.gif)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: on my way
Posts: 30,682
Received 3,416 Likes
on
2,855 Posts
2012 CLS63
I'm not sure you are grasping the whole situation I have described. This is not a typical headliner removal. And I'm certain it's not quite the same as a 20 year old Toyota headliner removal. You are trivializing the situation. And quite frankly, your statement that it's hardly a new car is insulting. 6k miles on a 6 month old vehicle is indeed a new car.
It's not a simple headliner removal. I would not have an issue with the headliner removal. It's the removal of the entire interior PLUS portions of the braking system that are the issue.
It's not a simple headliner removal. I would not have an issue with the headliner removal. It's the removal of the entire interior PLUS portions of the braking system that are the issue.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
2020 GLE 350 w/ AMG Exterior V167
Wait what?? I don't think Chassis even said anything about it not being a new car.......I did. It has 6k miles on it. Do you think a car at a dealer with 6k miles would be considered new? How can you be offended by the fact that it isn't new!? While I do completely understand your anger and frustration with the car and it's current state of affairs; I can't understand the sentiment of offence.
And in my opinion, a car purchased in April of this year (6 months ago) is indeed still a new car. Maybe not by Kelly Blue Book standards but to the one making the payments on it, it most certainly is.
Last edited by RamAir50; 10-06-2019 at 01:18 PM.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 6,607
Received 1,186 Likes
on
853 Posts
2020 GLE 450; 2023 BMW M2 Coupe
My apologies to chassis, I have corrected my post. This whole situation has me quite steamed.
And in my opinion, a car purchased in April of this year (6 months ago) is indeed still a new car. Maybe not by Kelly Blue Book standards but to the one making the payments on it, it most certainly is.
And in my opinion, a car purchased in April of this year (6 months ago) is indeed still a new car. Maybe not by Kelly Blue Book standards but to the one making the payments on it, it most certainly is.
#22
Out Of Control!!
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: unbegrenzt
Posts: 13,467
Received 3,989 Likes
on
3,136 Posts
2017 GLE350 4MATIC
No apologies necessary.
It's a low mileage, nearly new, car with a warranty repair that is time intensive to correct. Very annoying and inconvenient.
The work to rectify the defect is typical, and not unusual, for vehicles of this type in the modern era. Again, very annoying and inconvenient.
It's a low mileage, nearly new, car with a warranty repair that is time intensive to correct. Very annoying and inconvenient.
The work to rectify the defect is typical, and not unusual, for vehicles of this type in the modern era. Again, very annoying and inconvenient.
#23
MBWorld God!
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/EvoM/fcotmicon.gif)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: on my way
Posts: 30,682
Received 3,416 Likes
on
2,855 Posts
2012 CLS63
My apologies to chassis, I have corrected my post. This whole situation has me quite steamed.
And in my opinion, a car purchased in April of this year (6 months ago) is indeed still a new car. Maybe not by Kelly Blue Book standards but to the one making the payments on it, it most certainly is.
And in my opinion, a car purchased in April of this year (6 months ago) is indeed still a new car. Maybe not by Kelly Blue Book standards but to the one making the payments on it, it most certainly is.
#24
Member
Another reason why I lease. No matter what happens there is light at the end of the tunnel even if it's 30 months away. Sorry you had to endure this mess.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 446
Received 134 Likes
on
76 Posts
2020 GLE450 4Matic AMG-Line
I view lease payments as a subscription service for transportation with the ability to travel when and where I want. I just have to add in maintenance fees as well.