GLE 53 AMG New Owner - Already Having Issues
Everyone has different need when it comes to purchase. Some people just don’t need the power, but they what something more than a regular Mercedes. Sometime a good deal comes up. bottom line it’s just a car, they might just have a budget on transportation. Or they have so much disposal income they don’t really care because they will buy a new car next year or two.
You don’t judge your co-worker or employee by the size of their dick, after all there are a lot more to consider just engine size. I love “real” AMG also, I wish I can go out buy a GT black series. But I have a kid so I rather spend my money slowly then standing at the gas station filling up the 63.




But the 500E and the E500 were both Porsche built. They essentially designed and built the whole car, modifying the 124 chassis to shoehorn the big V8 into the 6cyl space. And modifying the V8 itself. Plus a lot of aero.
(I am still baffled by the frequent M-B nomenclature changes over the years. Still learning.)
But the 500E and the E500 were both Porsche built. They essentially designed and built the whole car, modifying the 124 chassis to shoehorn the big V8 into the 6cyl space. And modifying the V8 itself. Plus a lot of aero.
https://youtu.be/vhvg-mjoPc4
Thanks!
(I am still baffled by the frequent M-B nomenclature changes over the years. Still learning.)




Part of my feelings about the grille is because I participated in the REAL Carrera Panamericana, and while these new grilles may EVOKE a performance image, they aren't the Real Thing either.
But now I drive a car with the rip-off grille, and I'm getting used to it. I don't disparage others with the fake grille, whether I'm fully used to it or not. I like my car.
Everyone has different need when it comes to purchase. Some people just don’t need the power, but they what something more than a regular Mercedes. Sometime a good deal comes up. bottom line it’s just a car, they might just have a budget on transportation. Or they have so much disposal income they don’t really care because they will buy a new car next year or two.
You don’t judge your co-worker or employee by the size of their dick, after all there are a lot more to consider just engine size. I love “real” AMG also, I wish I can go out buy a GT black series. But I have a kid so I rather spend my money slowly then standing at the gas station filling up the 63.
I also do not think it has anything to do with how many kids you have or whether or not you want to be standing at a gas station! That's an odd line of 'reasoning' IMO.
Either way, to update for any one who might be searching for the same issue now or in the future, the dealership just called me, it looks like it is a "known" to Mercedes issue. The front driveshaft needs a special grease put on. Not sure if its a driveshaft or the axle but the service manager called it the driveshaft.
They have the grease on its way, and hopefully this is the fix for it.
I will keep the thread updated as soon as I receive the vehicle back.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Either way, to update for any one who might be searching for the same issue now or in the future, the dealership just called me, it looks like it is a "known" to Mercedes issue. The front driveshaft needs a special grease put on. Not sure if its a driveshaft or the axle but the service manager called it the driveshaft.
They have the grease on its way, and hopefully this is the fix for it.
I will keep the thread updated as soon as I receive the vehicle back.
But hey, I'm only 16 so what do I know?OH WAIT A MINUTE!! I GET IT, YOU WERE JUST ASSUMING! LOL, THE JOKE IS ON ME! I GET IT NOW!!!
Thanx Sir




The interior is primo and can be optioned nicer than the 63S. The 63 has more standard equipment but there are still 20+ options like Carbon Fiber, Drivers Assistance, Massaging seats, HUD, Augmented Video, Soft Close Doors, etc that are optional in either model. You can add a suspension package to the 53 that includes 6 piston brakes & ARC that comes standard in the 63S. The interior and exterior are pretty much the same so there’s nothing added to make it look like an AMG. The badge & exhaust outlets are the only visual difference. Actually my GLE 53 is better equipped than many GLE 63 S models. The entry level 53 allows people the option to have one for a little less money and with features they need since most urban drivers will never need or want some of the 63 S engine power and suspension that come at a huge difference in economy.
The engine is a fantastic in-line 6 with better performance than many older V8’s. Electric turbo boost; larger exhaust turbo & EQ Boost mild hybrid make for a Sporty engine. The torque curve is strong at a wide RPM level.The same drive train is standard in the S Class that is also available with a detuned V8 engine like the GLE 580.
What about the newly announced AMG C63 with a 4 banger? Who’s going to tell Mercedes that it isn’t a true AMG? It’s faster than the car it replaces but not a V8🤢




The "one man, one engine" is a myth - they aren't hand-built any more, except for the placing of camshafts and piston insertion. The rest is by robots. The "one man" only squires the engine along the production line to the next robot. And has a fancy badge that is glued to the engine cover to make buyers think they're special. In fact the AMG "assembly line" reminds me of the one I worked on as a UAW worker in the 60's at the REO/Diamond T factory. (World's toughest truck!)
The design of the AMGs is AMG. The AMG53 is an in-house design, just like the AMG63S. They are both built by robots, in various clean rooms along the production line. They are both significantly more powerful than the non-AMG engines they are based on.
The 53 engine moves ICE engines into the modern era, while the V8 seems to be ignored regarding development - probably because its replacement will likely be a more powerful 4 banger. It's old hat, with it's most modern feature the 500cc cylinder size that is shared with 3, 4, 6, and 8 cylinder Mercedes engines.
The V8 IS more powerful, coarse, rough and noisy, and that's attractive to a certain subset of buyers.
I can't speak for other 53 owners, but in my case, I like the new technology, and I have an affinity for straight sixes. I've been waiting for the 450 it was announced several years ago, and then Wham AMG comes up with the 53.
I loved my XK120, lusted after an XKE, kept trying to buy the neighbor's 300SL Roadster while it appreciated faster than my purchase funds, put 700,000 miles on my FJ45 Land Cruiser, skipped BMW sixes after Bangle made them ugly, and now I drive probably the most advanced straight six that may ever be produced. I don't expect a 53 to appreciate in value like the aforementioned, but it will have a place in history.
So, even though there hasn't been a "true AMG" since 2005, I don't care.
The very nice 53 engine, coupled with (finally) an AMG ARC suspension that sets standards and IMO finally surpasses Porsche's top-line suspenders, makes it a very desirable car.
It's an upgrade from my last year's 450, a Non AMG car which was very nice in its own right.
The "one man, one engine" is a myth - they aren't hand-built any more, except for the placing of camshafts and piston insertion. The rest is by robots. The "one man" only squires the engine along the production line to the next robot. And has a fancy badge that is glued to the engine cover to make buyers think they're special. In fact the AMG "assembly line" reminds me of the one I worked on as a UAW worker in the 60's at the REO/Diamond T factory. (World's toughest truck!)
The design of the AMGs is AMG. The AMG53 is an in-house design, just like the AMG63S. They are both built by robots, in various clean rooms along the production line. They are both significantly more powerful than the non-AMG engines they are based on.
The 53 engine moves ICE engines into the modern era, while the V8 seems to be ignored regarding development - probably because its replacement will likely be a more powerful 4 banger. It's old hat, with it's most modern feature the 500cc cylinder size that is shared with 3, 4, 6, and 8 cylinder Mercedes engines.
The V8 IS more powerful, coarse, rough and noisy, and that's attractive to a certain subset of buyers.
I can't speak for other 53 owners, but in my case, I like the new technology, and I have an affinity for straight sixes. I've been waiting for the 450 it was announced several years ago, and then Wham AMG comes up with the 53.
I loved my XK120, lusted after an XKE, kept trying to buy the neighbor's 300SL Roadster while it appreciated faster than my purchase funds, put 700,000 miles on my FJ45 Land Cruiser, skipped BMW sixes after Bangle made them ugly, and now I drive probably the most advanced straight six that may ever be produced. I don't expect a 53 to appreciate in value like the aforementioned, but it will have a place in history.
So, even though there hasn't been a "true AMG" since 2005, I don't care.
The very nice 53 engine, coupled with (finally) an AMG ARC suspension that sets standards and IMO finally surpasses Porsche's top-line suspenders, makes it a very desirable car.
It's an upgrade from my last year's 450, a Non AMG car which was very nice in its own right.
I am waiting for an ordered 53 which should be in the showroom end of Sept or early Oct. Not sure if it is a 21 or 22 but I would think that they will be similar if not identical. Not sure that they would change the production line from one day to the other with different components. Given the shortage of key components, I would image that no manufacturer including MB would have a stockpile of any component that they "have to use up".
The key issues that I have read about with the V167 is the 48v battery, noise on the driver side mirror, some software related issues, and a thump noise here and there. Not sure what the total number of these that were sold nor the ones affected by these more severe issues. Overall I would think that these are more reliable than not. Am I wishful thinking about this? I really would like to see a reasonable response from fans and not so much fans. No need for the "V167 lemon" crowd to spew their dislike. I would appreciate an honest response from those that were fans but may have been disappointed and why. Thanks in advance.
The "one man, one engine" is a myth - they aren't hand-built any more, except for the placing of camshafts and piston insertion. The rest is by robots. The "one man" only squires the engine along the production line to the next robot. And has a fancy badge that is glued to the engine cover to make buyers think they're special. In fact the AMG "assembly line" reminds me of the one I worked on as a UAW worker in the 60's at the REO/Diamond T factory. (World's toughest truck!)
The design of the AMGs is AMG. The AMG53 is an in-house design, just like the AMG63S. They are both built by robots, in various clean rooms along the production line. They are both significantly more powerful than the non-AMG engines they are based on.
The 53 engine moves ICE engines into the modern era, while the V8 seems to be ignored regarding development - probably because its replacement will likely be a more powerful 4 banger. It's old hat, with it's most modern feature the 500cc cylinder size that is shared with 3, 4, 6, and 8 cylinder Mercedes engines.
The V8 IS more powerful, coarse, rough and noisy, and that's attractive to a certain subset of buyers.
I can't speak for other 53 owners, but in my case, I like the new technology, and I have an affinity for straight sixes. I've been waiting for the 450 it was announced several years ago, and then Wham AMG comes up with the 53.
I loved my XK120, lusted after an XKE, kept trying to buy the neighbor's 300SL Roadster while it appreciated faster than my purchase funds, put 700,000 miles on my FJ45 Land Cruiser, skipped BMW sixes after Bangle made them ugly, and now I drive probably the most advanced straight six that may ever be produced. I don't expect a 53 to appreciate in value like the aforementioned, but it will have a place in history.
So, even though there hasn't been a "true AMG" since 2005, I don't care.
The very nice 53 engine, coupled with (finally) an AMG ARC suspension that sets standards and IMO finally surpasses Porsche's top-line suspenders, makes it a very desirable car.
It's an upgrade from my last year's 450, a Non AMG car which was very nice in its own right.




To start out, I have had more issues than most people on the Forum. Some things people might not even notice …I’m a little bit of a perfectionist. Current car is my 2nd GLE and I might buy a third one soon. I love the car…period. The GLE 450 was very nice with not only great looks, fit & finish, but also a practical SUV. It had good performance, fantastic economy and decent handling. The drive train was first class with no 48 volt battery issues. It was an early build and over the course of 18 months the MBUX control unit failed, the 12 volt AGM battery started losing its charge and I had the key Fobs that needed to have a shake to wake up. All were fixed by the Dealer under warranty by a great service department. The battery & MBUX controller caused other weird happenings until diagnosed.
A lot of early (Feb-June 2019 built) GLE’s were built with missing components and stored on lots all over the US and Germany. Many of these seem to be subject to more than usual issues since so much was hurried, components not tested and too much subsequent assembly done later.
I had a great year financially in 2020 so when the GLE 53 became available I ordered one immediately. Demand for the GLE was high and mine sold the day it hit the lot after CPO prep. The buyer (a year later) has had no issues. Overall I love the 53 even more than my 450 but it came with another set of problems. Once again the drive train is as “good as it gets”. My Pandemic build had fit & finish issues and Orange (not red) seats with stitching flaws. It looks like Mercedes added a second source to build more seats. My car was parked for a month off line while missing components were added. A piece of tape left on the lower windshield referenced changing the front bumper. It also looked like the rocker panels were added later. I’ve been watching recent builds and fit & finish/seats seem back to normal. A few weeks ago my 48 volt joined an increasing bunch built in the 4th Q that failed. My vehicle doesn’t read traffic signs very well and so there are issues with Distronic. I’m told that Mercedes has a traffic sign fix coming soon. The 53 handles like a dream with a good balance of comfort yet very good road manners. I have the AMG Dynamic Plus package that adds brakes and active sway bars (ARC) that are standard on the 63 S. Fuel economy is close to the 450 after you get over the initial urge to enjoy the acceleration and handling. I tow a Polaris RZR back and forth to a second home (650 miles) at the same high speed that I drive without it. It handles the 3,000 lbs but passing and fuel economy suffer at higher speeds of 80+
I am perfectly happy with my 53’s performance but might try the 63 S since my 53 has held it’s value so well. The V8 will have better passing power at speed but might use more fuel. It’s nice to travel 650 miles with only one fuel stop since each stop seems to add 20-30 minutes to an already long day.
I’m not a Mercedes fan boy but I am a big GLE fan…issues be damned. There is a lot of cutting edge technology and like everything tech an issue in waiting, IMO. A good way to eliminate issues might be to cut out some Tech like Driver Assistance and the like.
So far I love it. Its in the shop to get an xpel and graphene treatment before taking it out for longer road trips.
As a test, can you disable the auto start-stop? If this was the cause, it should behave much better. I've heard the car does take some time to adapt to the driver, and there is also a break-in period where you cannot really push the vehicle until something like 1,500km, and under 80mph the whole time. (there is a sticker on the windshield regarding this)
As a test, can you disable the auto start-stop? If this was the cause, it should behave much better. I've heard the car does take some time to adapt to the driver, and there is also a break-in period where you cannot really push the vehicle until something like 1,500km, and under 80mph the whole time. (there is a sticker on the windshield regarding this)




See if you can find driving situations where you can duplicate your complaint, so you can duplicate it. Better yet - so the tech can reliably duplicate it when they get to work on it.
And give it some time.
Good luck.




Like Mikapen said document the events that bother you and write down as much detail as possible. One thing not mentioned is that you might need to establish some credibility. I’ve heard stories about clueless people and observed one at my Dealer last year. After a while a Service writer might get a little biased about those intermittent glitches that might be lack of understanding.
I had one harsh 2-1 downshift a week ago, might never happen again but I made a note of it.
On a day when I hit a lot of red lights, I let off the brake at the same time Start/Stop was shutting down the engine & got a harsh lurch 2 times. After the second one I figured it out. As the car ahead started creeping forward I let off just after stopping. Unusual & after over two years that was a first.
When accelerating, right around 20mph, you hear an audible "thump" and the car jerks.
While coming to a stop, right around 6mph, again you hear a "thump" and the car jerks.
Took the car to my local dealer today who has always been amazing with me, and the service advisor jumped in for a quick drive with me and he also noticed that it wasn't normal. The car only has 400 miles and already having issues, which isn't exactly a good experience.
I wanted see if anyone else had similar problems.
It almost feels like something is engaging and disengaging. I tried to a do a search on the forum, but haven't seen anything like this reported.





