The future of internal combustion engine cars
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,950
Received 1,637 Likes
on
1,206 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
Since my GLE53 continues to be delayed (1+yr wait now), I had ordered a Volvo XC90 T8 Recharge. It was attractive mainly because of the 7500 IRS credits. Since I'll only get it Nov/Dec, I don't think it's worth it anymore because the credits are gone due to IRA enactment! So, I'm most likely getting an ICE now (hopefully the GLE53)
In 1997, I spent $10,000 on Energy Saving Windows, expecting a Tax Credit. It was removed in November of that year without notice, so I missed it.
In 2000, I did the same (new house) and spent $10,000 on insulation under the Fed Tax Credit Program, but it was eliminated in Nov of that year without warning. Missed that, too.
In 2010, I got a $10,000 tax credit for my BlueTec ML. I actually got it, but wasn't expecting to!
Now Diesels are Horrible, and VW / M-B came under the gun for violating EPA "rules." How the pendulum swings.
I lost my Special-ordered-already-built-shipped-to-Maryland '15 GLE Diesel, which just disappeared.
Do you suppose all the drawbacks of EV's will put them on the Horrible list soon?
Why do the Feds think they can incentivize unproven products? Popularity and votes, not science.
Another FWIW.
VW didn't break any EPA guidelines, because EPA never published any. Still haven't. I used to work closely with the EPA, and I'm aware that they violated the 2010 US Supreme Court ruling to enact rules. The case was brought by Bosch et. al. (OEMs and OEM manufacturers) because there was no guidance, and they needed direction to develop new technologies. Sounds reasonable, but not for EPA. They need to be "On the Fence" because their funding depends on being on board with whatever Administration signs the checks.
In 2015, Bosch et.al. sued and won again at the Supreme Court, who issued a stronger judgement against the EPA. They still have not acted.
Further, the EPA received the entire VW (and all others') software coding, which was specifically approved by EPA.
Then a College does testing and finds that there are "Defeat Devices" which were expressly approved to facilitate "fast warm-ups." They were, in fact, Defeat Devices, but not to defeat the EPA (non) guidelines, but to facilitate earlier "spirit of the law" - quicker warm-up.
Now that the S*** has hit the fan, the EPA is very quiet about their violation of two specific Supreme Court rulings. Nobody wants to sue their Regulators
So the industries are left to guess, spend Billions, waiting for the next Popular Trend. EV or ICE.
The following users liked this post:
edpare (01-30-2023)
#27
Super Member
All is not lost…introducing synthetic fuel made from CO2, water, and wind power…it’s CO2 neutral if you care about such things.
Last edited by TexAg91; 08-21-2022 at 05:26 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Ron.s (08-20-2022)
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,377
Received 1,032 Likes
on
700 Posts
2024 GMC Canyon Denali..... 2018 Audi SQ5
[QUOTE=TexAg91;8619834]All is not lost…introducing synthetic fuel made from CO2, water, and wind power…it’s CO2 neutral of you care about such things.
I saw a recent article too…but it’s almost $45 a gallon now. Obviously by scaling production that number will come down.
Here’s some additional info:
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a3...eutral-e-fuel/
I saw a recent article too…but it’s almost $45 a gallon now. Obviously by scaling production that number will come down.
Here’s some additional info:
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a3...eutral-e-fuel/
#29
Super Member
[QUOTE=Ron.s;8619835]
Yes, small quantities being produced to prove out the concept, price is not a concern. The raw ingredients are cheap— CO2 from the air, water, and power from wind or solar…or the grid. If there is money to be made, the capital will come to build the required infrastructure. I see this being funded with private capital…not taxes.
All is not lost…introducing synthetic fuel made from CO2, water, and wind power…it’s CO2 neutral of you care about such things.
I saw a recent article too…but it’s almost $45 a gallon now. Obviously by scaling production that number will come down.
Here’s some additional info:
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a3...eutral-e-fuel/
I saw a recent article too…but it’s almost $45 a gallon now. Obviously by scaling production that number will come down.
Here’s some additional info:
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a3...eutral-e-fuel/
Last edited by TexAg91; 08-21-2022 at 01:29 PM.
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,950
Received 1,637 Likes
on
1,206 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
F1 is using a percentage of synfuels now, and increasing annually.
Goal is to lead the way.
Goal is to lead the way.
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,377
Received 1,032 Likes
on
700 Posts
2024 GMC Canyon Denali..... 2018 Audi SQ5
[QUOTE=TexAg91;8619864]
Yes, small quantities being produced to prove out the concept, price is not a concern. The raw ingredients are cheap— CO2 from the air, water, and power from wind or solar…or the grid. If their is money to be made, the capital will come to build the required infrastructure. Is see this being funded with private capital…not taxes.
The hype is “Carbon Neural and Sustainable”, I have yet to see anything about economic feasibility. You could be right but it’s also possible that it will be a lot more expensive than petroleum based and the EV equivalent. The current production of 34,000 gallons (all to Porsche) leaves open the question of feasibility at high volumes. Porsche has sorta admitted that they need more by saying they will run it “if available”. The cost of land, Facilities, equipment and added Wind Farms//Grid energy, profit margin, etc. aren’t free. IMO, feasibility remains an open question. Porsche has put up $75 million so maybe it will work out. The raw material is free, hopefully this will give us another option even if it gets blended with Petroleum based fuel. It looks to be at least a 4 step process.
Here’s the explanation of the process for anyone not following the subject:“Produced using electricity generated by wind power, eFuels are impressively sustainable. Through electrolysis, water is broken down into its components (hydrogen and oxygen). The hydrogen is then processed with CO2 (extracted from the air) in order to produce e-methanol.
In the final step, referred to as the methanol-to-gasoline synthesis, it is turned into synthetic raw gasoline. This is then processed into a standard-compliant fuel that can be used in all gasoline engines.
From 2022, the plant (located in southern Chile) is expected to produce 34,000 gallons of synthetic fuel per year. Initially, the automaker will purchase this in full, using the eFuel in its motorsport activities. In the future, however, the brand will use synthetic fuel in its own combustion-engined models which, thankfully, includes classic cars.”
Yes, small quantities being produced to prove out the concept, price is not a concern. The raw ingredients are cheap— CO2 from the air, water, and power from wind or solar…or the grid. If their is money to be made, the capital will come to build the required infrastructure. Is see this being funded with private capital…not taxes.
Here’s the explanation of the process for anyone not following the subject:“Produced using electricity generated by wind power, eFuels are impressively sustainable. Through electrolysis, water is broken down into its components (hydrogen and oxygen). The hydrogen is then processed with CO2 (extracted from the air) in order to produce e-methanol.
In the final step, referred to as the methanol-to-gasoline synthesis, it is turned into synthetic raw gasoline. This is then processed into a standard-compliant fuel that can be used in all gasoline engines.
From 2022, the plant (located in southern Chile) is expected to produce 34,000 gallons of synthetic fuel per year. Initially, the automaker will purchase this in full, using the eFuel in its motorsport activities. In the future, however, the brand will use synthetic fuel in its own combustion-engined models which, thankfully, includes classic cars.”
#32
Super Member
[QUOTE=Ron.s;8620102]
The hype is “Carbon Neural and Sustainable”, I have yet to see anything about economic feasibility. You could be right but it’s also possible that it will be a lot more expensive than petroleum based and the EV equivalent. The current production of 34,000 gallons (all to Porsche) leaves open the question of feasibility at high volumes. Porsche has sorta admitted that they need more by saying they will run it “if available”. The cost of land, Facilities, equipment and added Wind Farms//Grid energy, profit margin, etc. aren’t free. IMO, feasibility remains an open question. Porsche has put up $75 million so maybe it will work out. The raw material is free, hopefully this will give us another option even if it gets blended with Petroleum based fuel. It looks to be at least a 4 step process.
Here’s the explanation of the process for anyone not following the subject:“Produced using electricity generated by wind power, eFuels are impressively sustainable. Through electrolysis, water is broken down into its components (hydrogen and oxygen). The hydrogen is then processed with CO2 (extracted from the air) in order to produce e-methanol.
In the final step, referred to as the methanol-to-gasoline synthesis, it is turned into synthetic raw gasoline. This is then processed into a standard-compliant fuel that can be used in all gasoline engines.
From 2022, the plant (located in southern Chile) is expected to produce 34,000 gallons of synthetic fuel per year. Initially, the automaker will purchase this in full, using the eFuel in its motorsport activities. In the future, however, the brand will use synthetic fuel in its own combustion-engined models which, thankfully, includes classic cars.”
On the surface...once the infrastructure is in place and the capital expense recuperated, how could it not be cheaper than gasoline from petroleum? The raw materials are abundant and cheap, and I would think the infrastructure sustainment costs would be a push. If you don't want to build a dedicated windmil or solar farm, use grid energy...it's being "greened" up each year.
The hype is “Carbon Neural and Sustainable”, I have yet to see anything about economic feasibility. You could be right but it’s also possible that it will be a lot more expensive than petroleum based and the EV equivalent. The current production of 34,000 gallons (all to Porsche) leaves open the question of feasibility at high volumes. Porsche has sorta admitted that they need more by saying they will run it “if available”. The cost of land, Facilities, equipment and added Wind Farms//Grid energy, profit margin, etc. aren’t free. IMO, feasibility remains an open question. Porsche has put up $75 million so maybe it will work out. The raw material is free, hopefully this will give us another option even if it gets blended with Petroleum based fuel. It looks to be at least a 4 step process.
Here’s the explanation of the process for anyone not following the subject:“Produced using electricity generated by wind power, eFuels are impressively sustainable. Through electrolysis, water is broken down into its components (hydrogen and oxygen). The hydrogen is then processed with CO2 (extracted from the air) in order to produce e-methanol.
In the final step, referred to as the methanol-to-gasoline synthesis, it is turned into synthetic raw gasoline. This is then processed into a standard-compliant fuel that can be used in all gasoline engines.
From 2022, the plant (located in southern Chile) is expected to produce 34,000 gallons of synthetic fuel per year. Initially, the automaker will purchase this in full, using the eFuel in its motorsport activities. In the future, however, the brand will use synthetic fuel in its own combustion-engined models which, thankfully, includes classic cars.”
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,950
Received 1,637 Likes
on
1,206 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
If you stop and think about it, oil is essentially "captured carbon."
The following users liked this post:
Brocktoon (08-21-2022)
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,377
Received 1,032 Likes
on
700 Posts
2024 GMC Canyon Denali..... 2018 Audi SQ5
[QUOTE=TexAg91;8620123]
On the surface...once the infrastructure is in place and the capital expense recuperated, how could it not be cheaper than gasoline from petroleum? The raw materials are abundant and cheap, and I would think the infrastructure sustainment costs would be a push. If you don't want to build a dedicated windmil or solar farm, use grid energy...it's being "greened" up each year.
Capital expenses are amortized over the useful life of plant and equipment so that could be 30-40 years for the plant and and 10-15 for equipment. During that time there is maintenance expense and equipment gets upgraded or repaired. You will also have increasing variable costs from labor, power, transportation, middlemen (distributors/gas stations) and taxes to pay plus there is going to be a profit margin added. The actual cost of crude oil is small compared to the cost of refined gas at the pump. Will these new “refinery type processes” be less expensive than refining crude? The steps of converting the ethanol to gasoline and then to useable fuel are unknown’s…seems complicated? Will Governments subsidize this product like they did with Ethanol? Will the Save the planet movement be happy with them using water and Oxygen in high volumes? Water has become a scarce resource in many places. We have cheap gas in the US because of our refinery’s and economy of scale vs European Countries that gave higher transportation costs. We use about 135 billion gallons of gasoline annually so there might need to be local, high volume production in the US. Gasoline prices and EV costs will also increase in the future. Just the transition process of transportation and distribution could take a decade or more. Will the Political situation waver enough to even give this technology a chance?
There are too many unknowns at this time, IMO. I hope it becomes a viable alternative because the EV future is being mandated without enough concern over consequences.
On the surface...once the infrastructure is in place and the capital expense recuperated, how could it not be cheaper than gasoline from petroleum? The raw materials are abundant and cheap, and I would think the infrastructure sustainment costs would be a push. If you don't want to build a dedicated windmil or solar farm, use grid energy...it's being "greened" up each year.
There are too many unknowns at this time, IMO. I hope it becomes a viable alternative because the EV future is being mandated without enough concern over consequences.
#35
Super Member
Well it is an interesting tech that has potential, will be interesting to watch to see if it pans out.
#36
Member
![Question](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon5.gif)
Imagine a major hurricane threatening South Florida and everyone is evacuating on their EV's, and they get stuck trying to get to the charging stations. The same holds true for Blizzards and forest fires.
#37
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
This would be an interesting innovative avenue when it comes to EVs.
#38
Member
Consumers decide what they want to buy not government or manufacturers. IMHO, Going down the single source path of electric for everything is a huge mistake even if, which is not possible yet, it was possible. Imagine what can be done using what governments did with Covid if electricity is the main source for everything you do, need, etc…
#39
Member
you mean like they line up at gas stations when there’s any sort of emergency?
#41
Super Member
That’s actually a good point, although if you’re stuck on the freeway barely moving your battery really doesn’t drain too much, but yes if you run out it’s not like you can take a gas can and fill it back up in an emergency.
This would be an interesting innovative avenue when it comes to EVs.
This would be an interesting innovative avenue when it comes to EVs.
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
lol.
I was thinking more along the lines of a portable, rechargeable suitcase-size battery (2 or 3 KWH) that had enough power for 15 or so miles (at 2 WH/Mile). If we assume 12 lbs per KWH, that battery would weigh up to 40 lbs. Heavy but still manageable. Would people buy such a device and keep it in their garage for an emergency? Maybe. I should patent one.
Actually, someone already has. https://www.zipcharge.global
I was thinking more along the lines of a portable, rechargeable suitcase-size battery (2 or 3 KWH) that had enough power for 15 or so miles (at 2 WH/Mile). If we assume 12 lbs per KWH, that battery would weigh up to 40 lbs. Heavy but still manageable. Would people buy such a device and keep it in their garage for an emergency? Maybe. I should patent one.
Actually, someone already has. https://www.zipcharge.global
#44
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,950
Received 1,637 Likes
on
1,206 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
And now an Aussie bank won't make auto loans for ICE cars. I know Australia is pretty Woke, so I'm not surprised.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...ctric-vehicles
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...ctric-vehicles
The following users liked this post:
Ron.s (08-22-2022)
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Well it’s easy for that Australian bank to say activism is behind their decision, but if anything they’re probably thinking the same thing that I am (and the reason why I created this thread to begin with): will the value of internal combustion engines cars start to tank soon? If that happens, the collateral on these loans would be worth a lot less, greatly increasing their exposure to losses on these loans.
If I was a bank, I, too, would start to question the risks of giving loans for these types of cars.
If I was a bank, I, too, would start to question the risks of giving loans for these types of cars.
#46
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,377
Received 1,032 Likes
on
700 Posts
2024 GMC Canyon Denali..... 2018 Audi SQ5
Well it’s easy for that Australian bank to say activism is behind their decision, but if anything they’re probably thinking the same thing that I am (and the reason why I created this thread to begin with): will the value of internal combustion engines cars start to tank soon? If that happens, the collateral on these loans would be worth a lot less, greatly increasing their exposure to losses on these loans.
If I was a bank, I, too, would start to question the risks of giving loans for these types of cars.
If I was a bank, I, too, would start to question the risks of giving loans for these types of cars.
IMO, there’s a better chance that used ICE vehicles will hold value for at least 10-15 years as the mandates for EV’s move forward. There are almost 300 million cars in the US alone so it will take decades to make the transition to EV even if they were 100% in demand by the public.
The following users liked this post:
mikapen (08-22-2022)
#47
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Every asset a bank loans to depreciates. Right now, however, there is some level of certainty when it comes to predicting the value of that asset over time. This allows a bank to accurately weigh the risk versus collateral and make the loan. This transitory period presents a lot of uncertainty.
Again, I’m saying this is going to happen overnight, but it’s certainly coming in my opinion. But yes, that article brings up another point, maybe the more immediate risk and fallout sits on loans for more expensive cars simply because the buyers for these cars can more easily afford to make the transition.
Again, I’m saying this is going to happen overnight, but it’s certainly coming in my opinion. But yes, that article brings up another point, maybe the more immediate risk and fallout sits on loans for more expensive cars simply because the buyers for these cars can more easily afford to make the transition.
#48
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,377
Received 1,032 Likes
on
700 Posts
2024 GMC Canyon Denali..... 2018 Audi SQ5
Every asset a bank loans to depreciates. Right now, however, there is some level of certainty when it comes to predicting the value of that asset over time. This allows a bank to accurately weigh the risk versus collateral and make the loan. This transitory period presents a lot of uncertainty.
Again, I’m saying this is going to happen overnight, but it’s certainly coming in my opinion. But yes, that article brings up another point, maybe the more immediate risk and fallout sits on loans for more expensive cars simply because the buyers for these cars can more easily afford to make the transition.
Again, I’m saying this is going to happen overnight, but it’s certainly coming in my opinion. But yes, that article brings up another point, maybe the more immediate risk and fallout sits on loans for more expensive cars simply because the buyers for these cars can more easily afford to make the transition.
The simple fact is that there will be little change in the percentage of ICE vs EV vehicles by 2025. The huge numbers of existing ICE vs new EV production mean the percentage can’t be switched anytime soon.
The following users liked this post:
mikapen (08-22-2022)
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,950
Received 1,637 Likes
on
1,206 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
[QUOTE=Ron.s;8620102]
The hype is “Carbon Neural and Sustainable”, I have yet to see anything about economic feasibility. You could be right but it’s also possible that it will be a lot more expensive than petroleum based and the EV equivalent. The current production of 34,000 gallons (all to Porsche) leaves open the question of feasibility at high volumes. Porsche has sorta admitted that they need more by saying they will run it “if available”. The cost of land, Facilities, equipment and added Wind Farms//Grid energy, profit margin, etc. aren’t free. IMO, feasibility remains an open question. Porsche has put up $75 million so maybe it will work out. The raw material is free, hopefully this will give us another option even if it gets blended with Petroleum based fuel. It looks to be at least a 4 step process.
Here’s the explanation of the process for anyone not following the subject:“Produced using electricity generated by wind power, eFuels are impressively sustainable. Through electrolysis, water is broken down into its components (hydrogen and oxygen). The hydrogen is then processed with CO2 (extracted from the air) in order to produce e-methanol.
In the final step, referred to as the methanol-to-gasoline synthesis, it is turned into synthetic raw gasoline. This is then processed into a standard-compliant fuel that can be used in all gasoline engines.
From 2022, the plant (located in southern Chile) is expected to produce 34,000 gallons of synthetic fuel per year. Initially, the automaker will purchase this in full, using the eFuel in its motorsport activities. In the future, however, the brand will use synthetic fuel in its own combustion-engined models which, thankfully, includes classic cars.”
That plant is an Exxon Mobile / Siemens endeavor, with VAG leading and BMW also participating. The Proof of Concept will only generate about 800 gallons, and Exxon's current footprint is very small - they think it's scalable. Picture in this article - https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/2021...ile-25683.html
I expect XOM to be a leader, if not THE leader, in green fuels. I think they have invested, or committed to invest, $10 Billion near term, despite the Fed's punishing them for keeping us Energy Independent.
Here's Exxon's announcement https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/New...ace-conditions
Regarding the racing program, Mercedes was worked with Petronas for lubes and fuels, but their Synfuel business has been focused on civilian use in Malaysia. Ferrari is with Shell. Etc.
Mercedes announced in 2020, that they would abandon all SynFuels because it was not a "viable option," as others have said above, and that they would be focusing on battery cars. https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/i...-viable-option
Mercedes also said they were quitting their world-leading Hydrogen Fuel Cell project, which they had been working on since 1992, with H2 fleets operating since 2003. Old article: https://group.mercedes-benz.com/inno...omobility.html
Some big bets being made here.
The hype is “Carbon Neural and Sustainable”, I have yet to see anything about economic feasibility. You could be right but it’s also possible that it will be a lot more expensive than petroleum based and the EV equivalent. The current production of 34,000 gallons (all to Porsche) leaves open the question of feasibility at high volumes. Porsche has sorta admitted that they need more by saying they will run it “if available”. The cost of land, Facilities, equipment and added Wind Farms//Grid energy, profit margin, etc. aren’t free. IMO, feasibility remains an open question. Porsche has put up $75 million so maybe it will work out. The raw material is free, hopefully this will give us another option even if it gets blended with Petroleum based fuel. It looks to be at least a 4 step process.
Here’s the explanation of the process for anyone not following the subject:“Produced using electricity generated by wind power, eFuels are impressively sustainable. Through electrolysis, water is broken down into its components (hydrogen and oxygen). The hydrogen is then processed with CO2 (extracted from the air) in order to produce e-methanol.
In the final step, referred to as the methanol-to-gasoline synthesis, it is turned into synthetic raw gasoline. This is then processed into a standard-compliant fuel that can be used in all gasoline engines.
From 2022, the plant (located in southern Chile) is expected to produce 34,000 gallons of synthetic fuel per year. Initially, the automaker will purchase this in full, using the eFuel in its motorsport activities. In the future, however, the brand will use synthetic fuel in its own combustion-engined models which, thankfully, includes classic cars.”
I expect XOM to be a leader, if not THE leader, in green fuels. I think they have invested, or committed to invest, $10 Billion near term, despite the Fed's punishing them for keeping us Energy Independent.
Here's Exxon's announcement https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/New...ace-conditions
Regarding the racing program, Mercedes was worked with Petronas for lubes and fuels, but their Synfuel business has been focused on civilian use in Malaysia. Ferrari is with Shell. Etc.
Mercedes announced in 2020, that they would abandon all SynFuels because it was not a "viable option," as others have said above, and that they would be focusing on battery cars. https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/i...-viable-option
Mercedes also said they were quitting their world-leading Hydrogen Fuel Cell project, which they had been working on since 1992, with H2 fleets operating since 2003. Old article: https://group.mercedes-benz.com/inno...omobility.html
Some big bets being made here.
Last edited by mikapen; 08-22-2022 at 06:34 PM.