Why MB isn't top of my list anymore...




So frustrating. There are many things about the car that impress me, like brake pads that last a 100k miles! Or how smooth and powerful the i6 engine is. I can live with the clunky transmission when slowing down. But these little paper cut things where they clearly have cut corners, just start to add up here and there and taint the opinion of MB quality. I know they don't make them like they used to pre-Chrysler, but come on MB. How is the synthetic leather in our 11 year old VW flawless, yet MB Tex has split open on both of our MB cars over the years? I've never once had a door switch break loose from the door before in any vehicle ever. The paint on the stalks is wearing off, the headliner is basically just sitting the pillar pieces, etc. It's these little things that makes you ask......
The Best or Nothing at all?
Last edited by nc211; Oct 17, 2025 at 05:59 PM.




Wait until you experience the new/current S-class gen (W223). That’s where those quality concerns become unacceptable and a complete disappointment at that point. Plastics everywhere around the seat. Rattles and creaks. Mbenz needs to go back to the drawing board. At least the GLS has always been like that (marginally acceptable quality), but the S-class went from great to marginally-trashy interior quality.




When this is over a decade old, and still looks like this with absolutely no issues whatsoever, it begs the question of why and how. I took this photo a few weeks ago, my son’s 2014 VW. A vehicle that cost less than a 1/3 new when compared to a MB. Wiped it down with a damp cloth and cleaned the windows. The seat isn’t even deformed on the bolster. Ours, on its 3rd MBTex seat cover in 5 years, doesn’t look nearly as good,
Stupid stuff like removing data capability from the center console or removing multichannel FLAC capability and hiding it in the upgraded audio is really annoying!




Last edited by S_W222; Oct 18, 2025 at 12:13 PM.
Trending Topics
When German cars hit a certain mileage point, they grenade and crumble into dust. As designed and intended by the manufacturers.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




There is so much about this GLS that was just slapped together with cheap plastic, it's really disappointing. Like the housing for the exterior cabin filter (up against the firewall on the passenger side). it's just such flimsy plastics. Same with the windshield cowl along the bottom. It literally just lifts off the glass. It's not failed, so I can't say it's a fault, but does make one wonder if they went that cheap on certain items, what's to come with the bigger ticket stuff. We're rounding 90k miles and no fluid leaks, nothing mechanical to complain about, and what I am complaining about is really superficial in the bigger picture arena. But for $100k....damn... We all know the lovely MB windshield wipers...
I think my German exposure is going to stay with VW / Audi going forward. At least for new cars. Not ruling out an older MB SL or something like that one day as a toy. But never buying a new MB again.
Neighbor has a 2022 GLA for his daughter. 2.0t engine, maybe 30k miles? It's very nice. Recently spent 2 weeks at the dealership for an oil change, of which the check engine light came on, and they "found something on one of the cylinders". Haven't a clue what it was, car is back home, but....
My F-150’s interior door handle broke off. They switched from a regular pull lever to a squeeze paddle handle on the 2015 generation because so many handles broke off.
The Ford’s rear center cupholder also broke completely off. I am not rough with my vehicles.
The Ford’s exterior door keypad also broke its mounting clips.
The Ford lugnuts rust on the inside of the 2 layers, swelling until the original hex socket no longer fits and you can’t change a tire on the side of the road.
The best selling vehicle in the country has problems with cheap plastics, it’s an industry-wide issue.
Last edited by Missourian; Oct 19, 2025 at 06:51 PM.




My F-150’s interior door handle broke off. They switched from a regular pull lever to a squeeze paddle handle on the 2015 generation because so many handles broke off.
The Ford’s rear center cupholder also broke completely off. I am not rough with my vehicles.
The Ford’s exterior door keypad also broke its mounting clips.
The Ford lugnuts rust on the inside of the 2 layers, swelling until the original hex socket no longer fits and you can’t change a tire on the side of the road.
The best selling vehicle in the country has problems with cheap plastics, it’s an industry-wide issue.








In non-AMG models, it's priced differently, but still extensive leather.
Mine still smells like leather after 4 1/2 years and 48,000 miles.
It's also a bit more comfy than standard leather. The feel is what sold me on the option.




The pictures are from the rear passenger door. The dog has never ridden in the middle row (bench, not captain chairs). It's just our daughter's spot. No, no real "hits" to the switches, but a few door slams over the years by accident. I've also had other repair the motorized window shade that has jumped off of it's guide pin on that door as well many times. It just falls out of the guide pin if the door is closed too hard. It's an easy, but very annoying fix. But again, this is a family car, advertised as a rugged SUV, so long as you don't slam the doors or have the blow-up beach ball in the second row....
I know I'm whining, and in reality it's all pretty trivial. But it's the easy things here that shouldn't be a problem for a manufacture like Mercedes Benz. I mean, the MBTex splitting on a 2020, after god only knows how many complaints about the exact same thing on the E series sedans from a decade prior? That's just damn stubborn crap from MB refusing to learn from their mistakes....or an engineered revenue maker... Either way, only car to ever suffer from these types of annoyances in my life, are my two Mercedes Benz vehicles. I know all cars have their little quirks and annoyances. None are perfect....




Mercedes only makes one rugged truck-like vehicle and that is for the parts outside of the vehicle and under the vehicle and the drivetrain. The interior is luxury and would never stand up to the ruggedness that the actual mechanical vehicle can. The typical Mercedes driver is not jumping into their seat wearing car hearts with a knife in the back pocket, they are normally wearing nice clothing and or business attire. Many of us can remember in the “olden days” that a parent would never let a child or a dog or a drink into the back of a Mercedes, especially anything with an S in the name.
if you want a rugged truck, you’re going to have to look towards a different brand. Mercedes tried the truck thing, which arrived as a failure ultimately. And I’ll add, the jumping feature (which has been removed) is for the oil barons that get stuck in the sand, not the US drivers that want to jump around in the middle of an intersection… or use their summer 22 inch tires in the snow. Those oil barons could also leave their truck in the middle of the desert and set it on fire and go buy a new one later that day so they’re not exactly looking at the durability of this car.
I guess some people are easily swayed by marketing especially when the reality we can all see around us is that materials are evolving to be cheap and throw away.
Mercedes only makes one rugged truck-like vehicle and that is for the parts outside of the vehicle and under the vehicle and the drivetrain. The interior is luxury and would never stand up to the ruggedness that the actual mechanical vehicle can. The typical Mercedes driver is not jumping into their seat wearing car hearts with a knife in the back pocket, they are normally wearing nice clothing and or business attire. Many of us can remember in the “olden days” that a parent would never let a child or a dog or a drink into the back of a Mercedes, especially anything with an S in the name.
if you want a rugged truck, you’re going to have to look towards a different brand. Mercedes tried the truck thing, which arrived as a failure ultimately. And I’ll add, the jumping feature (which has been removed) is for the oil barons that get stuck in the sand, not the US drivers that want to jump around in the middle of an intersection… or use their summer 22 inch tires in the snow. Those oil barons could also leave their truck in the middle of the desert and set it on fire and go buy a new one later that day so they’re not exactly looking at the durability of this car.
I guess some people are easily swayed by marketing especially when the reality we can all see around us is that materials are evolving to be cheap and throw away.







And driving on challenging off-road trails like Engineer Pass near Ouray CO, embarrassing Jeep clubs by "playing through" as they strategize their next obstacle, which is somewhat easy for a MB SUV.
And towing a 27' RV.
With my W164, W166, and now V167.
In short, I use the "Utility" aspect of my SUV consistently.
I've never had parts fall off. My most egregious flaw was the spark plug wiring harness (replaced under warranty), but I attribute that to Germany's requirements for fully recyclable components, which, although admirable, can decrease service life. It's a German thing - and EU to a certain extent.
My W223 in comparison absolutely is assembled with screws and bolts and not just clips like that.
I would not want to go back to the 222 from the 223, overall the 223 is a better car.
Last edited by SW20S; Oct 21, 2025 at 02:36 PM.




if you want a rugged truck, you’re going to have to look towards a different brand. Mercedes tried the truck thing, which arrived as a failure ultimately. And I’ll add, the jumping feature (which has been removed) is for the oil barons that get stuck in the sand, not the US drivers that want to jump around in the middle of an intersection… or use their summer 22 inch tires in the snow. Those oil barons could also leave their truck in the middle of the desert and set it on fire and go buy a new one later that day so they’re not exactly looking at the durability of this car.
I guess some people are easily swayed by marketing especially when the reality we can all see around us is that materials are evolving to be cheap and throw away.
Our GLS is basically a family anti-minivan minivan. It's a Costco Cruiser, school runner, road trip to NC hauler. The most "off roading" it has ever seen was a wet field parking lot for a HS cross-country race. It doesn't even see the sand when we're back in NC on the coast. Additionally, it barely sees 2,500 RPM on a routine basis, it just glides around from suburban spot to suburban spot, lives in the garage of a gated golf community and is pampered more than I am. As long as it continues to operate as well at it has over the last 5 years / 90k miles, we'll certainly see a decade and 150k-200k+ out of it.
But.... I won't be discounting other SUV's that cost less because they're not a Mercedes Benz the next time around. Yes, it's a very good car, perhaps the best rear seating room of any on the market and can cruise with the best of them. But the cheap plastics behind the laminate, are disappointing to say the least for (1) the brand itself, and (2) for the price point of admissions. Especially in today's dollars. Ours (2020) was $88k 5 years ago. Would be over $100k today.
They just need to spend a little less on EV investment, and invest a little more in refinement of the finishing touches, especially on the vehicles that are likely selling the most (SUV's). Not that they're any worse than anyone else, but certainly not miles ahead of anyone else either. In fact, I would argue they're falling behind the other German manufactures in that regard, despite having the nicest interior designs. No argument our GLS is perhaps the most beautiful vehicle we've ever owned (midnight blue / beige / open pore walnut / 21's). Just sucks when something repeatedly breaks because of cheap plastics hidden in the background.
Last edited by nc211; Oct 21, 2025 at 05:03 PM.
And driving on challenging off-road trails like Engineer Pass near Ouray CO, embarrassing Jeep clubs by "playing through" as they strategize their next obstacle, which is somewhat easy for a MB SUV.
And towing a 27' RV.
With my W164, W166, and now V167.
In short, I use the "Utility" aspect of my SUV consistently.
I've never had parts fall off. My most egregious flaw was the spark plug wiring harness (replaced under warranty), but I attribute that to Germany's requirements for fully recyclable components, which, although admirable, can decrease service life. It's a German thing - and EU to a certain extent.




I would not want to go back to the 222 from the 223, overall the 223 is a better car.
In the end it is about the balance between accepting a car’s imperfections and appreciating it, while also acknowledging its inferior quality. I’m doing the same for my GLS. I love it for how it is, but I know it should be better. I’m fine with that because it’s a family car. However, I wouldn’t accept that for my daily or luxury ride. The same way, I loved Tesla S, but I wish they’d offer premium cabin options and less road noise. And it’s interesting that Tesla has less plastic touch surfaces in the Model S than the W223, even though the Model S is more inferior to the S-class all around. But at least they covered those areas with vinyl materials emulating leather. I’d prefer vinyl material around the seats instead of plastic trim all day long.
Last edited by S_W222; Oct 21, 2025 at 11:58 PM.







