MY CLK55 AMG vs. M3
#1
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LONG ISLAND, N.Y
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55+2004 G500
MY CLK55 AMG vs. M3
A FRIEND OF MINE GOT A 2002 M3 6-SPEED AND WE WERE COMING HOME TOGETHER (SEPERATE CARS) FROM MANHATTAN ON THE PARKWAY. WE CAME TO A 10MPH ROLE AND NAILED 'EM. I WAS SHIFTING MY 55 MANUALLY AND STARTED THE ROLE IN FIRST GEAR AFTER SOME TIRE SPIN I NAILED SECOND PERFECTLY BEFORE I HIT THE CUTTER AND SPUN AND HOOKED HAD ABOUT A CAR AND A HALF ON HIM TILL ABOUT 80MPH. AFTER THAT IT WAS BYE-BYE M3 ALL THE WAY TO 140MPH I HAD AT LEAST 4-5 CARS ON HIM. HE COULDN'T BELEIEVE IT, HE WAS TALKING SO MUCH B.S BEFORE ABOUT HOW MUCH FASTERTHE M3 IS. AMG RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#3
Originally posted by TimmyC230boy
i bet your friends engine blows up soon.
i bet your friends engine blows up soon.
very soon and I hope there will be a mushroom so that people can see it from far away(a la search lights) and know where to go to see that crapppppp.
Last edited by Fast Eddy; 06-21-2002 at 12:35 AM.
#4
Re: MY CLK55 AMG vs. M3
Originally posted by VALENTINO
A FRIEND OF MINE GOT A 2002 M3 6-SPEED AND WE WERE COMING HOME TOGETHER (SEPERATE CARS) FROM MANHATTAN ON THE PARKWAY. WE CAME TO A 10MPH ROLE AND NAILED 'EM. I WAS SHIFTING MY 55 MANUALLY AND STARTED THE ROLE IN FIRST GEAR AFTER SOME TIRE SPIN I NAILED SECOND PERFECTLY BEFORE I HIT THE CUTTER AND SPUN AND HOOKED HAD ABOUT A CAR AND A HALF ON HIM TILL ABOUT 80MPH. AFTER THAT IT WAS BYE-BYE M3 ALL THE WAY TO 140MPH I HAD AT LEAST 4-5 CARS ON HIM. HE COULDN'T BELEIEVE IT, HE WAS TALKING SO MUCH B.S BEFORE ABOUT HOW MUCH FASTERTHE M3 IS. AMG RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A FRIEND OF MINE GOT A 2002 M3 6-SPEED AND WE WERE COMING HOME TOGETHER (SEPERATE CARS) FROM MANHATTAN ON THE PARKWAY. WE CAME TO A 10MPH ROLE AND NAILED 'EM. I WAS SHIFTING MY 55 MANUALLY AND STARTED THE ROLE IN FIRST GEAR AFTER SOME TIRE SPIN I NAILED SECOND PERFECTLY BEFORE I HIT THE CUTTER AND SPUN AND HOOKED HAD ABOUT A CAR AND A HALF ON HIM TILL ABOUT 80MPH. AFTER THAT IT WAS BYE-BYE M3 ALL THE WAY TO 140MPH I HAD AT LEAST 4-5 CARS ON HIM. HE COULDN'T BELEIEVE IT, HE WAS TALKING SO MUCH B.S BEFORE ABOUT HOW MUCH FASTERTHE M3 IS. AMG RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2000 BMW Z3 2.3 Roadster (hardtop current ly attached)
1) easy kill from a "roll" (look at the power the '55 makes vs. the M3 at low RPM)
2) you didn't nail any gear "perfectly... the computer did... and if his car is as new as it seems.... its hosed.
how the hell do you "hit the cutter?"
ditto the caps-lock thing.
2) you didn't nail any gear "perfectly... the computer did... and if his car is as new as it seems.... its hosed.
how the hell do you "hit the cutter?"
ditto the caps-lock thing.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: LI, New York
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All of them, as much as I can...
Cut Valentino some slack...with that kill, adrenalin's still flow'in, heart's still pump'in, keyboard's still shout'in...KILL KILL KILL M3!
Wait 'till someone kills a M5. it'll be caps & bold!
Wait 'till someone kills a M5. it'll be caps & bold!
#11
I hope your 55 beat the M3 since you paid about $20k more than he did....don't get me wrong I love MB and the 55's but as far as performance goes and the price you have to pay for it, I hate to say it but BMW kills MB on this...just look at the M5 compared to the 55....M5 standard has every option you could ever want, navigation, xenons, suede headliners, close to 400Hp, 18"....etc....
#12
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LONG ISLAND, N.Y
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55+2004 G500
K&N
The AMG air filter box holds two filters, so i pulled the stock AMG filters and replaced them with two K&N filters. To be honest with you I didn't feel any crazy gains but you definetley hear more air being sucked in especially at higher RPM.
#13
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LONG ISLAND, N.Y
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55+2004 G500
Price Diff.
Defenitley true about the price difference can't argue with you there, except for the xenons they do come standerd. The M5 and M3 are both great cars, just because I personelly like Mercedes better doesn't mean much to somebody else. I like M, I love AMG.
#14
Valentino I completely agree with you, I just wish MB could compete with BMW a little more as far as performance goes, I also like M but LOVE AMG, I don't know why, Mercedes just seem to stand out more...sorry if I came out like an ***.......I currently have a CLK500 on order and I am debating about getting the M3 instead so thats why I was so jumpy, my friends argue with me that I am crazy not to get the M3 and that the new CLK looks like a C-class.....we'll have to wait and see what the CLK I ordered looks like for me to make a final decision.........
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: LI, New York
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All of them, as much as I can...
The M3 is a nice car and I think everyone who bought a CLK55AMG pondered the same exact thing before buying. For me, all it took was closing the doors on both cars. Just listen to it and you'll immediately hear and feel the difference in material and assembly quality. I saw too many bare painted metal nooks and crannies in the M3, and the leather on the MB appealed better to my taste. True, the M3 is a tad better performing stock out of the showroom, but after I put 19s and better rubber on, no M3 can touch my CLK55. See, if I were between the age of 25 and 40, I would have just gone to the BMW dealer and drove away with the M3; swept by all the marketing and advertising hype that appeals to that age group. I'm 51 and with age comes a little reason and decision-making maturity that allowed me to make a sound comparison (actually I also looked at the M5 and still opted for the CLK). I'm not saying BMW owners are unreasonable and immature, just that the MBs perhaps tend to appeal to an older market.
#18
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32 AMG
Re: Valentino you dont have INDUCTION
Originally posted by IDOITBST
Valentino you dont have INDUCTION just cuz ur replaced the stock filters..!!!
Valentino you dont have INDUCTION just cuz ur replaced the stock filters..!!!