Beat a V8 Lotus really bad.
Cool looking car but not to impressive. 350hp out of a twin turbo 3.5Liter V8?
Anyone know how much they weigh?
BTW: My vette would have destroyed the Lotus. 11.3 to 11.5 at 118-120 in the 1/4. Only Dyno's around 400 at the wheels and weighs 3500 lbs with me a 300lb driver.
Cool looking car but not to impressive. 350hp out of a twin turbo 3.5Liter V8?
Anyone know how much they weigh?
BTW: My vette would have destroyed the Lotus. 11.3 to 11.5 at 118-120 in the 1/4. Only Dyno's around 400 at the wheels and weighs 3500 lbs with me a 300lb driver.
Maybe you caught him in the wrong gear, but you never know, The kompressor cars put out more power then the MBUSA site says and pull hard at roll on speeds.
Of course, some drivers don't race, just kind of "keep up" just for fun. Who knows.
Last edited by C280Sportster; Aug 30, 2004 at 12:11 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I have no problem believing that a stock C32 could take the Lotus in the type of race described (30 to 110 MPH). Nor would it have surprised me if the Lotus had beaten the C32. Why do you guys insist on oversimplifying automotive performance (I believe that you are commonly referred to as "Magazine Racers")? While a 14 second car will almost always get stomped by a 12 second car, the outcome of a race between two cars with similar performance is not predictable. Never underestimate the effect of the many variables (like gas quality, maintenance, driver skill, junk-in-the-trunk) which come into play to decide which of two roughly comparable performance cars (like the Lotus and the C32) will win a drag race. Also, Collis may have a C32 that is a little quicker than most, and the Lotus may have been a little slower than most. Remember, some stock C32 guys on this forum have broken into the twelves (with slicks), while others have battled to break into the thirteens. I trust that Collis was correct in his perception that the Lotus was racing, and lost. Otherwise, what are we to believe. . . that the Lotus pushed the accelerator hard enough to only fall a few carlengths back by 110 MPH, but not all the way to the floor? That makes no sense whatsoever.
As far as the Vette numbers go, they sound plausible to me. My 3600 lb. C32 with roughly 330 RWHP ran a 12.8 @ 112 MPH with stock 245 radials, so why couldn't a lighter car with a (presumably) manual tranny, fatter rubber, and alot more HP run a 11.5 @ 120? An objection was made that this is a "Viper Time," but isn't the Viper also about the same weight and HP as Collis' Vette?
I have no problem believing that a stock C32 could take the Lotus in the type of race described (30 to 110 MPH). Nor would it have surprised me if the Lotus had beaten the C32. Why do you guys insist on oversimplifying automotive performance (I believe that you are commonly referred to as "Magazine Racers")? While a 14 second car will almost always get stomped by a 12 second car, the outcome of a race between two cars with similar performance is not predictable. Never underestimate the effect of the many variables (like gas quality, maintenance, driver skill, junk-in-the-trunk) which come into play to decide which of two roughly comparable performance cars (like the Lotus and the C32) will win a drag race. Also, Collis may have a C32 that is a little quicker than most, and the Lotus may have been a little slower than most. Remember, some stock C32 guys on this forum have broken into the twelves (with slicks), while others have battled to break into the thirteens. I trust that Collis was correct in his perception that the Lotus was racing, and lost. Otherwise, what are we to believe. . . that the Lotus pushed the accelerator hard enough to only fall a few carlengths back by 110 MPH, but not all the way to the floor? That makes no sense whatsoever.
As far as the Vette numbers go, they sound plausible to me. My 3600 lb. C32 with roughly 330 RWHP ran a 12.8 @ 112 MPH with stock 245 radials, so why couldn't a lighter car with a (presumably) manual tranny, fatter rubber, and alot more HP run a 11.5 @ 120? An objection was made that this is a "Viper Time," but isn't the Viper also about the same weight and HP as Collis' Vette?
I have a video of my vette running 11.68 at 118 next to my friend who ran a 11.8 at 121 (His car dynoed ~400 also). We have similar setups but he has a 2001 vs. my 98 convertable.
Can someone host it?
BTW: I have only lost 1 time to a viper against 9 different vipers. He drove the hell out of a 2004 Viper and I spun pretty bad in a 1/8 mile race. I ran a 7.8 at 92 to his 7.7 at 94 mph. He actually out 60' footed me 1.86 to a 1.92. My average 60 is 1.78 over my last 30 runs at the track. Vipers are hard to launch and if you do launch them hard they have a problem with break half shafts and u joints.
S4CE: Yea I did get beat from a roll against 2 6 speed cars. 6 speeds have better gearing for roll races! I also destroyed a similar 6 speed supra (430 rwhp) on drag radials by 3 cars from zero to 125 when I was running low 12's at the track and dynoed ~360. (Ask Beau Fensky)



