Runner up in AOL best SUV of the year
12-23-2011, 08:30 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 Blk/Blk ML350 4Matic
Runner up in AOL best SUV of the year
Click to page 9 in the link below for the ML:
http://autos.aol.com/photos/2011-car...6pLid%3D122700
I don't get the love affair with the Evoque and its hideous styling. That thing must have a blind spot from hell.
http://autos.aol.com/photos/2011-car...6pLid%3D122700
I don't get the love affair with the Evoque and its hideous styling. That thing must have a blind spot from hell.
12-23-2011, 09:43 PM
#2
Actually, the Evoque was my choice before I started looking at the ML - I believed the price of the ML350 was more than I wanted to spend.
Then I sat in the ML350....if you could have sex with a car....I had a one night stand with the ML
Then I sat in the ML350....if you could have sex with a car....I had a one night stand with the ML
12-23-2011, 10:56 PM
#3
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2012 C250 Coupe
Most people will agree the Evoque does NOT have hideous styling, but it is a POS, as are all Land Rovers. I had a Freelander (predecessor to the LR3) which turned me so strongly against the brand, I replaced it with a ::cough:: Toyota.
12-23-2011, 11:10 PM
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 Blk/Blk ML350 4Matic
The skinny rear quarter windows seem over the top to me as in some designer's attempt of form way over function. How is it possible to even look out those things? The rest of the truck does not look too bad, but the rear looks like it was squashed or something.
12-23-2011, 11:24 PM
#5
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2012 C250 Coupe
I noticed two things during my C-Coupe test drive [as compared to aforementioned Toyota]:
- significantly less headroom
- moderately reduced side/rear visibility
So...while I hear you about form over function, I am not canceling my order. ;-)
- significantly less headroom
- moderately reduced side/rear visibility
So...while I hear you about form over function, I am not canceling my order. ;-)
12-23-2011, 11:41 PM
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 Blk/Blk ML350 4Matic
Evoque to me = kind of funny looking as in funny ha ha
12-24-2011, 12:08 AM
#7
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2012 C250 Coupe
Damn right the Coupe is TIGHT AS HELL. :-) Now, what about the Acura ZDX?
Do you think it's uglier than the Evoque?
After having another look, I might co-sign on the Land Rover looking downright stupid from the rear.
Do you think it's uglier than the Evoque?
After having another look, I might co-sign on the Land Rover looking downright stupid from the rear.
Trending Topics
12-24-2011, 02:16 AM
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 Blk/Blk ML350 4Matic
12-24-2011, 02:17 AM
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 Blk/Blk ML350 4Matic
Ha ha, the interior is a grand slam.
12-24-2011, 02:20 AM
#10
Super Member
I really like te evoque. Not for me, since it doesn't fulfill what we need but being and Audi guy I really like its styling. Didn't think about visibility, but it probably is really bad.
