Auto Tailgate
Can this feature be disabled the wife can't stand it, I have to say she is not too keen on the car at the moment & regrets not buying the facelift Cayenne.I hope her mood changes quickly otherwise it will have been an expensive mistake
Anyone else not like the Auto Tailgate or is she in a minority

BTW: what is the point of the limiter, you have to crouch down to load the boot/I know you can move it manually it is just a pain in the arry.
Last edited by kokanee; Mar 4, 2007 at 02:18 AM.
Auto open/close trunk lid is the new craze in the high end cars. I am impartial to it, nice to have one but not a required item. I just wished the action could be quicker but I guess the damn American lawyers are just too powerful. Same comment for warning screens for navi, damn American lawyers again.
Tell your wife to step on the car and run for a few miles, mine was hooked after a while and stop complaining about the nagging stuff.
Trending Topics
I know that, she knows that but she still decided to buy the ML.I think it was the 8% discount that swayed her judgement against 0% discount from Porsche.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Would you mind elaborating on that point a bit, bearing in mind I should be comparing both cars later this week. Was that a comment about 'quality' or 'functionality' ?
I can see lots of cheap plastic materials & switchgear which you would'nt expect.
Porsche on the other hand in it's top of the line cars provide a more luxurious feel inside the cabin IMO.
Leather dash is one huge improvement over the ML (no leather for UK market), granted this is only standard in the Turbo (Full Leather Interior) but I am comparing CTT v ML63.
The Cayenne does feel like a sports car as close as you can get with a 4x4, & after reading many reviews on the new PDCC option (expensive) it does seem to transform an already excellent car into an unbelieavable car.
The bottom line is, it's all a matter of taste & a CTT in my eyes maybe superb but in your eyes may be no match to the ML.Each to their own.
I'm just hoping she will learn to love the ML as she did her Cayenne
Last edited by sirees01; Mar 4, 2007 at 07:33 AM.
I can see lots of cheap plastic materials & switchgear which you would'nt expect.
Porsche on the other hand in it's top of the line cars provide a more luxurious feel inside the cabin IMO.
Leather dash is one huge improvement over the ML (no leather for UK market), granted this is only standard in the Turbo (Full Leather Interior) but I am comparing CTT v ML63.
The Cayenne does feel like a sports car as close as you can get with a 4x4, & after reading many reviews on the new PDCC option (expensive) it does seem to transform an already excellent car into an unbelieavable car.
The bottom line is, it's all a matter of taste & a CTT in my eyes maybe superb but in your eyes may be no match to the ML.Each to their own.
I'm just hoping she will learn to love the ML as she did her Cayenne

Overall I quite like the layout of the ML, but I still struggle with Merc's single stalk and the stupid multi-function wheel. And where were the ergonomisists when they designed the buttons to adjust suspension and gearbox settings? They are impossible to use without taking your eyes off the road. Really stupid.
Last edited by DoctorD; Mar 4, 2007 at 07:55 AM.
the 63 seats are awesome I have to say, probably best seats we have had.
If I could change some features to the 63 it would probably be better than Cayenne, they would be.
Leather Dash
Alacantra Headlining
Better quality plastics & switchgear
Ability to change digital speedo from KMPH to MPH
Parktronic to start beeping as soon as yellow lights start showing
Chunkier winscreen wipers, they seem fit for a ford fiesta not ML63
Mostly cosmetic as you can see.
However, if they could come up with a PDCC system that Porsche have i'm sure that would be perfect.
The Cayenne also has the Autotailgate option on the new Cayenne, it is virtually identical to the ML i'm not sure if it goes "boing boing" though.



