ML63 engine mounts vs x166 GL550?




I was wondering if there was a technical difference between the two? I would think so as the part numbers are difference and they don’t seem to supersede the w166 engine mounts.
I would think both are liquid filled but do wonder if they is a difference in durability even though they look the same.
ML63 Engine mounts:
a1662407717
a1662407917
X166 GL Engine mounts:
a1662406017
a1662406117
I was wondering if there was a technical difference between the two? I would think so as the part numbers are difference and they don’t seem to supersede the w166 engine mounts.
I would think both are liquid filled but do wonder if they is a difference in durability even though they look the same.
ML63 Engine mounts:
a1662407717
a1662407917
X166 GL Engine mounts:
a1662406017
a1662406117
Main design differences are packaging space in the vehicle, heat/thermal load and engine torque.
Rule of thumb says the 63 is a more severe environment for engine mounts than the 550. Therefore rule of thumb says the 63 mounts should be no less durable than 550 mounts.




Main design differences are packaging space in the vehicle, heat/thermal load and engine torque.
Rule of thumb says the 63 is a more severe environment for engine mounts than the 550. Therefore rule of thumb says the 63 mounts should be no less durable than 550 mounts.




Main design differences are packaging space in the vehicle, heat/thermal load and engine torque.
Rule of thumb says the 63 is a more severe environment for engine mounts than the 550. Therefore rule of thumb says the 63 mounts should be no less durable than 550 mounts.
- do nothing
- replace with available MB parts (63 mounts)
- aftermarket mounts if available
Which option seems best to you?




I am calling them today to get clarification as I have other observations I need to discuss with them for the services performed.
Thanks for your input chassis.




Trending Topics




The Best of Mercedes & AMG




