R350 vs R500
What is the difference between R350(2007) and R500(2007)? I know that R500 has V8 but what else is different? And how is R500(2007) when compared to new R350(2010 and above)?
Thanks.
I opted for a new R class (09) because I wanted a 7 seat model. These were not avaialble until 2008 and starting that year, there were no R500 models for US anymore.
I opted for a new R class (09) because I wanted a 7 seat model. These were not avaialble until 2008 and starting that year, there were no R500 models for US anymore.
I don't think there were any options on the R500 that couldn't be had on an R350 though.
Standard equipments on R500 (but not R350)
18" wheels
13.8" front brake rotors
Silver painted grille, chrome trimmed door handle, chrome body side and window trims
Dual Chrome exhaust tips
Tele Aids
Power adjustable steering wheels
Heated Front seats
Burl Wood (darker)
Full leather seats,
premium lighting
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Seriously though I also drove an R-500 and while more powerful, my R350 provides all the zip anyone should need - it loves doing 140K on the highway and seems to be geared to do that speed. Only options I miss on mine would be xenons, and possibly the leather seat option, but in 2006 leather was standard on the front two seats.
The R350 is the new-design M272 engine (4 valves/cylinder, one spark plug/cylinder).
The new M273 V8 (383 hp) is now being installed in R-class but not sold in USA.
For most 2012 models, the V6 and V8s will be all-new designs.
My ML350 drives fine, I have no complains with it. When I start driving it I immediately notice however the difference in raw power between the two. I imagine the same would be said if I had a R350 since it is heavier than the ML. Do I consider my ML350 slow or sluggish? Not at all, however the V8 DOES have more power, and it is the extra 50 HP and torque make all the difference in the world, even at low speeds.
With that said, the conversation should be whether or not the V8 is worth it to the casual driver or not. My answer is, IT DEPENDS. The previous poster said that he test drove both and found little or no difference between the two. Clearly in that case the R350 makes much more financial sense, since he is not a spirited driver as most people aren't. (I am sorry but with a claim that an C300 could easily keep up with a R129 you are telling me that you don't push the throttle at all). In my case, when I first test drove the R350 I immediately rejected it, because it felt like the motor was trying too hard to do too much. Yes, I do have a lead foot, and yes, I expect a lot from a motor, so I opted for the V8. Also, the difference in mpg is small in my view so it is a non issue (or should be a non issue for most folks).
I know by saying this I raised eyebrows so here is what I mean: I drive each car about 10,000 miles per year (my wife uses them too), so let's say the annual average mpg for the V8 is 14mpg (I drive much more in the city) and for the V6 annual average is 17mpg (not 100% sure about these figures but should be close, the difference between the two however is right). If you do simple math you see that I need 714.28 gallons for the V8 and 588.23 gallons for the V6. Multiply each by $3 (cost of premium fuel per gallon) you get annual totals: $2,143(V8) $1,765(V6) so the difference is $378 per year. IMHO $378 per year is well worth the extra expense to have a car with great performance. It's like $30 per month... It costs more to watch HBO on cable for crying out loud. Considering that folks spend many thousands for aftermarket wheels and extra accessories (my favorite is when folks buy the V6 and then they immediately post questions about increasing HP) to still be stuck with the slower motor $378 per year is way cheap!
That's my 2 cents!
Last edited by aggst1; Sep 25, 2010 at 04:29 PM.
I've a backup camera and xenons on my 2007 R350 which are, quite literally, brilliant. Sometimes could do with the power of the 500 but the 350 adequate.










