6.9 Amg

Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
but BTT
http://www.m-100.cc/
But you really want to read this thread:
http://www.mercedesshop.com/shopforu....php3?t=108750
Short answer, stay away from the car.

When AMG was an independant company they could do as they pleased, and often created cars that MB never would have approved of. Now they are controlled by big brother MB and everything has to be approved by MB management creating very nice, but somewhat more conservative cars.
This is like calling a '65 Shelby GT-350 less of a "Shelby" than a '70 Shelby GT-350 (which had major Ford involvement). This is just the opposite of how these cars are viewed.
Anyone care to explain? Or perhaps I'm just misinterpreting what's being said here.
Interestingly, there MUST have been some cooperation between Mercedes-Benz and AMG, long before the C36.
Proof: My W124 CD Repair Manual lists part numbers for the AMG 3.4 liter 6.
Too bad that in todays climate, AMG does not support (meaning spare parts, etc.) the "old school" AMG cars any longer. Without spare parts, many of these classic treasures will be lost.....unable to be faithfully restored 20 or 30 years from now.
Brabus and RennTech are about the closest thing to what AMG once was.

Look at it this way. If I take a 190E and drop a 2.5 engine out of an EVOII into it, does that make it an Evo II? NO! It's a 190E that now goes a hell of a lot faster.
Back to the topic at hand; re-read what I said carefully. Factory 6.9s are NOT AMG CARS because AMG didn't touch them. There's a popular myth that AMG did tune the engines of the 6.3 and 6.9 but I've never seen any hard proof of this. For the 6.3 I believe it to be impossible as AMG was born around the time this car was produced. AMG's first car was indeed a wrecked doctor's car. Now if they had ties to the factory from the beginning, why would they need to buy a wrecked secondhand MB? By the time the 6.9 came out they were definitely a larger, stronger company but still not that closely tied to the factory. If they had been, why would MB go to Porsche for the 500E, even after AMG produced the absolutely amazing Hammer???
As for how pre-merger AMG cars are treated, precisely WHERE did I ever say such cars are NOT AMG cars? I think they're a hell of a lot more AMG than some of the stuff coming out these days with an ///AMG badge on it (hello, G55? ML55?)
Re-read my original post. What I said, precisely, was that the 450 SEL is NOT an AMG car. All 6.9s were NOT tuned by AMG. I'm sure they tuned some of them (and I'd LOVE to find one), but a vanilla 6.9 IS NOT an AMG car and the car in question (unless I'm missing something) most certainly wasn't tuned by AMG.
Yes it's nitpicky as hell, but some of us Mercedes fanatics care deeply about the history of these cars and to ****-ists like me it IS important.
Last edited by kaneman; Dec 23, 2004 at 10:43 PM.







