S-Class (W220) 1999-2006: S 320 CDI, S 320, S430, S 500, S 600

My stock S65 goes 11.59@122...movies/time slips inside.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-27-2009 | 09:16 PM
  #26  
Stephen04E55's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 855
Likes: 41
From: Mechanicsville, VA
'09 CLK550, '21 Camaro ZL1 1LE, '06 C55 AMG, '20 AMG GT53, 09 E63
Its a great comparison of a stock S600 vs S65 to see my S600 stock on drag radials vs this S65. His run of 11.59@122 is just incredible. My best run stock on drag radials is 11.97@114.7 with a 1.75 60'. You can see the hp difference and the potential there. I bet the AMG tune of the S65 is more aggressive but the larger displacement (5.5 vs 6.0) and the 65 series minor exhaust and intercooler circuit upgrades help as well. Good luck with the Kleemann tune and I hope it gives you a great performance increase.
Old 01-28-2009 | 04:16 PM
  #27  
Busa196's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 436
Likes: 18
From: USA
2018 S63, lowered
Originally Posted by Stephen04E55
Its a great comparison of a stock S600 vs S65 to see my S600 stock on drag radials vs this S65. His run of 11.59@122 is just incredible. My best run stock on drag radials is 11.97@114.7 with a 1.75 60'. You can see the hp difference and the potential there. I bet the AMG tune of the S65 is more aggressive but the larger displacement (5.5 vs 6.0) and the 65 series minor exhaust and intercooler circuit upgrades help as well. Good luck with the Kleemann tune and I hope it gives you a great performance increase.

That's good info Stephen, my brother (housclass) and I plan on bolting up my DR's to his 600 and seeing how it does. It'll be interesting to compare the 2 of you .
Old 01-29-2009 | 01:46 AM
  #28  
razb0yn1k23's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
a few AMGs
Damn nice, my s55 looks like **** next to this lmaoo.
Old 01-29-2009 | 07:31 PM
  #29  
over the edge's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
SL65
Originally Posted by Busa196
I ran it in dyno mode.....no ESP at all. That's the only way to get a good burnout and ET, IMO.




I ran the car on Mickey Thompson ET Streets 265/40/18......traction was no problem. As far as "launch technique" is concerned, very simple......I stood on the brake as hard as I could and power braked the car up to about 3k and then let go when I saw green. 3k is the point where the torque of the car overcomes the brakes and you can barely manage to hold it still......I thought I was going to physically "bend" the brake pedal from pushing on it so hard. MB bulids a solid car, no doubt about it
Has anyone run the 305 ET streets on stock 9.5" rims (SL55)? I realize the min width is supposed to be 10.0 but factory rims are usually a bit wider than listed. I doubt there would be any rubbing issue since its only 1cm wider on each side than a stock 285. Hoever I am a bit concerned since the et streets run a bit a larger overall (vs nittos which seem to run small).
Old 04-19-2009 | 11:39 PM
  #30  
Fastgreek's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 439
Likes: 3
From: Macungie, Pa
2005 SL55 2022 GLE350
i gotta get one of these........

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: My stock S65 goes 11.59@122...movies/time slips inside.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 AM.